Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Post Occupancy Evaluation of the Library Building: Diyarbakir Prof. Dr. Fuat Sezgin Provincial Public Library Cover

Post Occupancy Evaluation of the Library Building: Diyarbakir Prof. Dr. Fuat Sezgin Provincial Public Library

Open Access
|Jan 2025

References

  1. Ersoy, O. (1983). Halk Kütüphaneleri (Public Libraries), Bull. Turkish Librariansh, 32(1), 37–72.
  2. IFLA (2010). IFLA Public Library Service Guidelines, 2nd ed., 7(1). Hague: IFLA.
  3. Çapar, B. (1987). Halk Kütüphanesi Hizmetinin Yaygınlaştırılması ve Planlamasi (Public Library Service Expansion and Planning), Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 1 (2), 55–61.
  4. Aabo, S., Audunson, R. and Varheim, A. (2010). How do public libraries function as meeting places?, Libr. Inf. Sci. Res., 32(1), 16-26, doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.008.
  5. Bekar, I. (2021) Evaluation of Library Interior Spaces Within the Context of Universal Design Principles: Karadeniz Technical University Faik Ahmet Barutcu Library, J. Archit. Sci. Appl. Res. Artic., 6(1), 178–194.
  6. Cengiz, E., Külcü, Ö., & Yilmaz, B. (2019). Türkiye’deki Halk Kütüphanelerinin Derme Geliştirme Politikalari Açisindan Değerlendirilmesi (Evaluation of Public Libraries in Turkey in terms of Collection Development Policies). Bilgi Dünyası, 20(1), 1–24.
  7. Campell, H.C. (1983) Halk Kütüphanesi Sistem ve Hizmetlerinin Geliştirilmesi (Improvement of Public Library Systems and Services) Ankara: T.C. Kütüphaneler ve Yayimlar Genel Müdürlüğü.
  8. Latimer, K., & Niegaard, H. (2007). IFLA library building guidelines: developments & reflections. Walter de Gruyter–KG Saur.
  9. Preiser, W., & Vischer, J. (Eds.). (2006). Assessing building performance. Routledge.
  10. Westbrook, L. (1993). User needs: a synthesis and analysis of current theories for the practitioner. RQ, 541–549., [Online]. Available: http ://www.jstor.org/stable/25829371.
  11. Çağlayan, P. (2011) User Satisfaction Related to Public Library Services, Bilgi Dünyası, 12(2), 379–398, doi: 10.15612/bd.2011.204.
  12. Emsen, H., & Örmecioğlu, H. (2020). A Statistical Study on the Impact of Spatial Design on the User of University Libraries: The Case of Akdeniz University Central Library. Turkish Librarianship, 34(2).
  13. Liu, A. M. M. (1999). Residential satisfaction in housing estates: a Hong Kong perspective. Automation in construction, 8(4), 511–524.
  14. Preiser, W. F. (2016). Built environment evaluation: conceptual basis, benefits and uses. In Directions in Person-Environment Research and Practice (Routledge Revivals) (pp. 73–98). Routledge.
  15. Özkan, D. G. (2011). Kentsel açık mekânlarda kul-lanım sonrasi değerlendirme: Trabzon sahil bandı ömeği [Post occupancy evaluation in urban open spaces: A case study of Trabzon coast line) (Master of Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon)].
  16. Mustafa, F. A. (2017). Performance assessment of buildings via post-occupancy evaluation: A case study of the building of the architecture and software engineering departments in Salahaddin University-Erbil, Iraq. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(3), 412–429.
  17. Ahmed, W., & Hassanain, M. A. (2020). Post-occupancy evaluation of a university shopping mall facility. Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment, 13(2), 5–15.
  18. Leckie, G. J., & Hopkins, J. (2002). The public place of central libraries: Findings from Toronto and Vancouver. The Library Quarterly, 72(3), 326–372.
  19. Li, L. H., Wu, F., & Su, B. (2018). Impacts of library space on learning satisfaction-An empirical study of university library design in Guangzhou, China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(6), 724–737.
  20. Baltaci, A. (2018). Nitel araştirmalarda örnekleme yöntemleri ve örnek hacmi sorunsali üzerine kavram-sal bir inceleme. (A Conceptual Review of Sampling Methods and Sample Size Problems in Qualitative Research). Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 231–274.
  21. Yener, Ö., & Abdulkadir, G. (2007). Sosyal ve eğitim bilimleri araştirmalarinda evren-örneklem sorunu. (Population-Sampling Issue on Social and Educational Research Studies) Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazim Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (15), 394–422.
  22. Balci, A. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştirma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. (Research methods, techniques and principles in social sciences) Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 001–398.
  23. Kotrlik, J. W. K. J. W., & Higgins, C. C. H. C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43.
  24. Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of economics, commerce and management, 2(11), 1–22.
  25. Dominowski, R. L. (1980). Research methods (pp. pVIII+-390). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  26. Hassanain, M. A., Mathar, H., & Aker, A. (2016). Post-occupancy evaluation of a university student cafeteria. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(1), 67–77.
  27. H. Demir, ‘Demir, H. (2019). Türkiyedeki teknopark binalarinin kullanim sonrasi değerlendirmesi: Kullanici odakli bir yaklaşimla bina performans anal-izleri. (Determination of user preferences and evaluation criteria in Turkey technoparks) Master of Thesis, Dicle University)
  28. Demir Kayan, H. (2022). Türkiye Teknopart Mimarisi (Technopart Architecture in Turkey,), 1st ed. Ankara: Nobel Yayinevi.
  29. Yücel, G. (2016). Libraries and accessibility: Istanbul public libraries case. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 4 (2), 81–95.
  30. Irvall, B., & Nielsen, G. S. (2005). Access to Libraries for Persons with Disabilities: Checklist. IFLA Professional Reports, No. 89. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. PO Box 95312, 2509 CH, The Hague, Netherlands.
  31. Richard Kennedy Architects (2022). Asante Public Library.
  32. Cheng, W., Wu, J., Moen, W., & Hong, L. (2021). Assessing the spatial accessibility and spatial equity of public libraries’ physical locations. Library & Information Science Research, 43(2), 101089.
  33. International Energy Agency. (2021). Buildings: A Source of Enormous Untapped Efficiency Potential.
  34. UNEP (2020). Guidelines on Green Houses of Worship, Jul. 2020. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/guideline s-green-houses-worship.
  35. Architects Staff, (2022). AIA/ALA Name 2022 Library Building Award Winners. https://www.architectmagazine.com/awards/aia-awards/aia-ala-name-2022-library-building-award-winners_o.
  36. Gupta, N., & Tiwari, G. N. (2016). Review of passive heating/cooling systems of buildings. Energy Science & Engineering, 4(5), 305–333.
  37. Çilingiroğlu, S. (2010). İç Hava Kalitesi (Indoor Air Quality), Tesisat Mühendisliği, 115, 23-42, [Online]. Available: http://www1.mmo.org.tr/resimler/dosya_ekler/7f2a4e a3bedd425_ek.pdf.
  38. Ataç, F. (2013). Daylighting and artificial lighting criteria in libraries : Middle East Technical University central library reading study halls, Atilim University.
  39. Adcock, E. P., Varlamoff, M. T., & Kremp, V (1999). IFLA principles for the care and handling of library material.
  40. Bertot, J. C., McClure, C. R., Jaeger, P. T., & Ryan, J. (2006). Public libraries and the Internet 2006: Study results and findings. Information Institute, Tallahassee, FL.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acee-2024-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 19
Submitted on: Feb 17, 2022
Accepted on: Feb 13, 2024
Published on: Jan 9, 2025
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Hale DEMİR KAYAN, Ruşen ERGÜN, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.