References
- Francová, A., Chrastný, V., Vítková, M., Šillerová, H., Komárek M. (2020). Health risk assessment of metal(loid)s in soil and particulate matter from industrialized regions: A multidisciplinary approach. Environmental Pollution, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114057.
- Świelik R., Trojanowska M. (2022). Review Chemical Fractionation in Environmental Studies of Potentially Toxic Particulate-Bound Elements in Urban Air, Toxics; 10(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10030124
- Paplińska-Goryca M., Misiukiewicz-Stępień P., Proboszcz M., Nejman-Gryz P., Górska K., Zajusz-Zubek E., Krenke R. (2021). Interactions of nasal epithelium with macrophages and dendritic cells variously alter urban PM-induced inflammation in healthy, asthma and COPD. Scientific Reports, (art. no. 13259). 11, 1–21. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92626-w.
- Mainka A., Zajusz-Zubek E. (2015). Indoor air quality in urban and rural preschools in Upper Silesia, Poland: particulate matter and carbon dioxide, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 7697–7711.
- Lopuszanska-Dawid M., Kołodziej H., Lipowicz A., Szklarska A., Kopiczko A., Bielicki T. (2020). Social class-specific secular trends in height among 19-year old Polish men: 6th national surveys from 1965 till 2010, Economics and Human Biology, 37, 100832. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31924589/.
- PN-EN 14212:2013-02/AC:2014-06E Ambient air quality – Standard method for the measurement of the concentration of sulphur dioxide by ultraviolet fluorescence.
- PN-EN 14211:2013-02 Ambient air quality - Standard method for the measurement of the concentration of nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen monoxide by chemiluminescence.
- PN-EN 12341:2014-07 Ambient air - Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM10 or PM2,5 mass concentration of suspended particulate matter.
- Afshari, A., Mojahed M., Yusuff R. (2010). Simple Additive Weighting approach to personnel selection problem. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 1(5), 511–515.
- Alinezhad, A., Sarrafha, K., Amini, A. (2014). Sensitivity analysis of SAW technique: the impact of changing the decision making matrix elements on the final ranking of alternatives. Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 5(1), 82–94.
- Chen, T.Y. (2012). Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: discussions on score functions and weight constraints. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(2), 1848–1861.
- Churchman, C.W., Ackoff, R.L. (1954). An approximate measure of value. Journal of Operations Research Society of America, 2(1), 172–187.
- Deni, W., Sudana, O., Sasmita, A. (2013). Analysis and implementation fuzzy multi-attribute decision making SAW method for selection of high achieving students in faculty level. International Journal of Computer Science, 10(1), 674–680.
- Goodridge, W. S. (2016). Sensitivity analysis using Simple Additive Weighting method. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 8(5), 27–33.
- Huang, Y.S., Chang, W.C., Li, W.H., Lin, Z.L. (2013). Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(2), 462–469.
- Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and application. Springer, United States.
- Janssen, R. (1996). Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Kulwer Academic Publishers, Holland.
- Kobryń, A. (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji w gospodarowaniu przestrzenią. Difin, Polska.
- Koffka, K., Goodridge, W. (2015). Fault tolerant multi-criteria multi-path routing in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 7(6), 55–63.
- Kumar, M., Jayaswal, P., Kushwah K. (2013). Exploring fuzzy SAW method for maintenance strategy selection problem of material handling equipment. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 600–605.
- Memariani, A., Amini, A., Alinezhad, A. (2009). Sensitivity analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW): the results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4, 13–18.
- Mokhtari, E., Khamehchian, M., Montazer, G., Nikudel, M. (2016). Landfill site selection using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and artificial neural network method; a case study from Lorestan province, Iran. International Journal of Geography and Geology, 5(10), 209–223.
- Putra, D. W. T., Punggara A. A. (2018). Comparison analysis of simple additive Weighting (SAW) and weigthed product (WP) in decision support systems. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. [on line] 215(1), 1003. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/705b/2d3c3ba9e882f113f53c83ec185f7aef6425.pdf?_ga=2.165226936.624443085.1618500084-257788093.1618500084 [Accessed 25 Jan. 2021].
- Simanaviciene, R., Ustinovichius, L. (2010). Sensitivity analysis for multiple criteria decision making methods: TOPSIS and SAW. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(6), 7743–7744.
- Tahyudin, I., Rosyidi, R., Ahmar, A. S., Haviluddin, H. (2018). Comparison of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) with the Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2.2), 87–89.
- Trzaskalik, T. (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Przegląd metod i zastosowań. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, 74, 239–263.
- Trzaskalik, T. (red.), (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Metody i zastosowania. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Polska.
- https://www.traseo.pl/mapy-turystyczne/mapa/74/gliwice-i-okolice-polska-galileos
- Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 11 grudnia 2020 r. w sprawie dokonywania oceny poziomów substancji w powietrzu (Dz.U. z 2020 r., poz. 2279).