Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Figure 11.
Comparison with buckling pressure of the cylindrical shell given in Combescure and Gusic [27] and Rathinam and Prabu [13]
| Cylindrical shell | R (mm) | L (mm) | t (mm) | Young's modulus (GPa) | Poisson's ratio (γ) | FE eigen buckling pressure (MPa) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combescure and Gusic | Rathinam and Prabu | From present analysis | ||||||
| A | 50 | 20 | 0.15 | 200 | 0.3 | 0.2936 | 0.2927 | 0.2985 |
Material Properties [12]
| Material | Yield stresses (MPa) | Tangent Modulus (MPa) | Young's modulus (MPa) | Poisson's ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cylinder sheet | 198.8 | 1450 | 210 000 | 0.29 |
Comparison with buckling pressure of the cylindrical shell given in Windernburg and Trilling [28] and Rathinam and Prabu [13]
| Cylindrical shell | R (mm) | L (mm) | t (mm) | Young's modulus (GPa) | Poisson's ratio (γ) | FE eigen buckling pressure (MPa) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Windernburg and Trilling | Rathinamn and Prabu | From present analysis | ||||||
| 53 | 203.2 | 406.4 | 0.8 | 193 | 0.3 | 0.096 (8) | 0.108 (8) | 0.111 (8) |