Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Dent-to-Stiffener Evaluation Concept for Thin-Walled Steel Cylinders

Open Access
|Oct 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Cylinder geometry properties and dent shape
Cylinder geometry properties and dent shape

Figure 2.

(a) First eigen buckling mode shape in the isometric view of the model A given in Combescure and Gusic [27]. (b) First eigen buckling mode shape in the isometric view of model 53 given in Windernburg and Trilling [28]
(a) First eigen buckling mode shape in the isometric view of the model A given in Combescure and Gusic [27]. (b) First eigen buckling mode shape in the isometric view of model 53 given in Windernburg and Trilling [28]

Figure 3.

Boundary condition
Boundary condition

Figure 4.

Perfect Model (M37), a) Total deformation b) Maximum principal strains c) Von Mises stress d) Waveform
Perfect Model (M37), a) Total deformation b) Maximum principal strains c) Von Mises stress d) Waveform

Figure 5.

Perfect model (M37) results
Perfect model (M37) results

Figure 6.

0°-angle dent group results
0°-angle dent group results

Figure 7.

45°-angle dent group results
45°-angle dent group results

Figure 8.

90°– angle dent group results
90°– angle dent group results

Figure 9.

<-< and <-> dent shape group results
<-< and <-> dent shape group results

Figure 10.

Comparison of critical buckling pressure values according to theory and codes
Comparison of critical buckling pressure values according to theory and codes

Figure 11.

Effect of dent shape on buckling performance compared to the perfect model
Effect of dent shape on buckling performance compared to the perfect model

Comparison with buckling pressure of the cylindrical shell given in Combescure and Gusic [27] and Rathinam and Prabu [13]

Cylindrical shellR (mm)L (mm)t (mm)Young's modulus (GPa)Poisson's ratio (γ)FE eigen buckling pressure (MPa)
Combescure and GusicRathinam and PrabuFrom present analysis
A50200.152000.30.29360.29270.2985

Material Properties [12]

MaterialYield stresses (MPa)Tangent Modulus (MPa)Young's modulus (MPa)Poisson's ratio
Cylinder sheet198.81450210 0000.29

Comparison with buckling pressure of the cylindrical shell given in Windernburg and Trilling [28] and Rathinam and Prabu [13]

Cylindrical shellR (mm)L (mm)t (mm)Young's modulus (GPa)Poisson's ratio (γ)FE eigen buckling pressure (MPa)
Windernburg and TrillingRathinamn and PrabuFrom present analysis
53203.2406.40.81930.30.096 (8)0.108 (8)0.111 (8)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acee-2023-0032 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 43 - 54
Submitted on: Sep 20, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2023
Published on: Oct 20, 2023
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Oğuzhan Akarsu, Barış Bayrak, Mahmut Kiliç, Mahyar Maali, Abdulkadir Cüneyt Aydin, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.