Exploring Key Quality Indicators (KQIS) in Green Office Buildings Through Pareto Analysis
References
- Wuni, I. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Osei-Kyei, R. (2019). Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018. Energy and Buildings, 190, 69–85.
- Alencastro, J., Fuertes, A., & de Wilde, P. (2018). The relationship between quality defects and the thermal performance of buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 883–894.
- Altomonte, S., Saadouni, S., & Schiavon, S. (2016). Occupant Satisfaction in LEED and BREEAM-Certified Office Buildings. UC Berkeley: Center for the Built Environment. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/77j647gr
- Altomonte, S., & Schiavon, S. (2013). Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. Building and Environment, 68, 66–76.
- Baird, G., Leaman, A., & Thompson, J. (2012). A comparison of the performance of sustainable buildings with conventional buildings from the point of view of the users. Architectural Science Review, 55(2), 135–144.
- Lee, J. Y., Wargocki, P., Chan, Y. H., Chen, L., & Tham, K. W. (2019). Indoor environmental quality, occupant satisfaction, and acute building related health symptoms in Green Mark certified compared with non certified office buildings. Indoor air, 29(1), 112–129.
- Pastore, L., & Andersen, M. (2019). Building energy certification versus user satisfaction with the indoor environment: Findings from a multi-site post-occupancy evaluation (POE) in Switzerland. Building and Environment, 150, 60–74.
- Zalejska-Jonsson, A. (2014). Parameters contributing to occupants’ satisfaction: Green and conventional residential buildings, Facilities, 32(7/8), 411–437.
- Deuble, M. P., & de Dear, R. J. (2012). Green occupants for green buildings: the missing link? Building and Environment, 56, 21–27.
- Newsham, G. R., Birt, B. J., Arsenault, C., Thompson, A. J., Veitch, J. A., Mancini, S., Galasiu A. D., Gover, B. N., Macdonald, L. A. & Burns, G. J. (2013). Do ‘green buildings have better indoor environments? New evidence. Building Research & Information, 41(4), 415–434.
- Bordass, B., Leaman, A., & Ruyssevelt, P. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 5: conclusions and implications. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 144–157.
- Gossauer, E. and Wagner, A., (2008). Occupant satisfaction at workplace – a field study in office buildings, in F. Nicol (ed), Proceeding of Conference: Air Conditioning and the Low Carbon Cooling Challenge, Cumberland Lodge, Winsor, UK, July 2008, London, Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings.
- Frontczak, M., Schiavon, S., Goins, J., Arens, E., Zhang, H., & Wargocki, P. (2012). Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor air, 22(2), 119–131.
- Hamida, M. B., & Hassanain, M. A. (2020). Post occupancy evaluation of adaptively reused buildings: case study of an office building in Saudi Arabia. Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment (ACEE), 13(1), 29–40.
- Celadyn, M. (2016). Daylighting in sustainable interior design of offices. Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment (ACEE), 9(4), 5–12.
- Brown, Z., Cole, R.J., Robinson, J. and Dowlatabadi, H. (2010). Evaluating user experience in green buildings in relation to workplace culture and context, Facilities, 28(3/4), 225–238.
- Lee, Y. S. (2011). Comparisons of indoor air quality and thermal comfort quality between certification levels of LEED-certified buildings in USA. Indoor and Built Environment, 20(5), 564–576.
- Gou, Z., Lau, S. S. Y., & Zhang, Z. (2012a). A comparison of indoor environmental satisfaction between two green buildings and a conventional building in China. Journal of Green Building, 7(2), 89–104.
- Altomonte, S., Schiavon, S., Kent, M. G., & Brager, G. (2019). Indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction in green-certified buildings. Building Research & Information, 47(3), 255–274.
- Clements, J. S. (2018). Two case studies of acoustical design in new construction using sustainable criteria: The living building challenge and WELL building design at The Georgia Institute of Technology. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(3), 1661–1661.
- Licina, D., & Langer, S. (2021). Indoor air quality investigation before and after relocation to WELL-certified office buildings. Building and Environment, 204, 108182.
- Licina, D., & Yildirim, S. (2021). Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and self-reported productivity before and after relocation into WELL-certified office buildings. Building and Environment, 204, 108183.
- Ildiri, N., Bazille, H., Lou, Y., Hinkelman, K., Gray, W. A., & Zuo, W. (2022). Impact of WELL certification on occupant satisfaction and perceived health, well-being, and productivity: A multi-office pre-versus post-occupancy evaluation. Building and Environment, 224, 109539.
- Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2018). Innovation, low energy buildings and intermediaries in Europe: systematic case study review. Energy Efficiency, 11(1), 31–51.
- Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.
- Craft, R.C. and Leake, C. (2002). The Pareto principle in organizational decision making, Management Decision, 40(8), 729–733.
- Karuppusami, G. and Gandhinathan, R. (2006). Pareto analysis of critical success factors of total quality management: A literature review and analysis, The TQM Magazine, 18(4), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780610671048
- Geng, Y., Lin, B., & Zhu, Y. (2020). Comparative study on indoor environmental quality of green office buildings with different levels of energy use intensity. Building and Environment, 168, 106482.
- Kim, H. G., & Kim, S. S. (2020). Occupants’ Awareness of and Satisfaction with Green Building Technologies in a Certified Office Building. Sustainability, 12(5), 2109.
- Khoshbakht, M., Gou, Z., Xie, X., He, B., & Darko, A. (2018). Green building occupant satisfaction: Evidence from the Australian higher education sector. Sustainability, 10(8), 2890.
- Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Lin, B., Hong, J., & Zhu, Y. (2018). Occupant satisfaction in Three-Star-certified office buildings based on comparative study using LEED and BREEAM. Building and Environment, 132, 1–10.
- Sant’Anna, D. O., Dos Santos, P. H., Vianna, N. S., & Romero, M. A. (2018). Indoor environmental quality perception and users’ satisfaction of conventional and green buildings in Brazil. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43, 95–110.
- Altomonte, S., Saadouni, S., Kent, M. G., & Schiavon, S. (2017). Satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in BREEAM and non-BREEAM certified office buildings. Architectural Science Review, 60(4), 343–355.
- Fieldson, R., & Sodagar, B. (2017). Understanding user satisfaction evaluation in low occupancy sustainable workplaces. Sustainability, 9(10), 1720.
- Lin, B., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Pei, Z., & Davies, M. (2016). Measured energy use and indoor environment quality in green office buildings in China. Energy and Buildings, 129, 9–18.
- Sediso, B. G., & Lee, M. S. (2016). Indoor environmental quality in Korean green building certification criteria – certified office buildings - occupant satisfaction and performance. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 22(5), 606–618.
- Pei, Z., Lin, B., Liu, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2015). Comparative study on the indoor environment quality of green office buildings in China with a long-term field measurement and investigation. Building and Environment, 84, 80–88.
- Gou, Z., Prasad, D., & Lau, S. S. Y. (2014). Impacts of green certifications, ventilation and office types on occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality. Architectural Science Review, 57(3), 196–206.
- Liang, H. H., Chen, C. P., Hwang, R. L., Shih, W. M., Lo, S. C., & Liao, H. Y. (2014). Satisfaction of occupants toward indoor environment quality of certified green office buildings in Taiwan. Building and Environment, 72, 232–242.
- Schiavon, S., & Altomonte, S. (2014). Influence of factors unrelated to environmental quality on occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. Building and Environment, 77, 148–159.
- Agha-Hossein, M. M., El-Jouzi, S., Elmualim, A. A., Ellis, J., & Williams, M. (2013). Post-occupancy studies of an office environment: energy performance and occupants’ satisfaction. Building and Environment, 69, 121–130.
- Gou, Z., Prasad, D., & Lau, S. S. Y. (2013). Are green buildings more satisfactory and comfortable? Habitat International, 39, 156–161.
- Gou, Z., & Lau, S. S. Y. (2013). Post occupancy evaluation of the thermal environment in a green building. Facilities.
- Hirning, M. B., Isoardi, G. L., Coyne, S., Hansen, V. G., & Cowling, I. (2013). Post occupancy evaluations relating to discomfort glare: A study of green buildings in Brisbane. Building and Environment, 59, 349–357.
- Menadue, V., Soebarto, V., & Williamson, T. (2013). The effect of internal environmental quality on occupant satisfaction in commercial office buildings. HVAC&R Research, 19(8), 1051–1062.
- Gou, Z., Lau, S. S. Y., & Chen, F. (2012b). Subjective and objective evaluation of the thermal environment in a three-star green office building in China. Indoor and Built Environment, 21(3), 412–422.
- Gou, Z., Lau, S. S. Y., & Shen, J. (2012c). Indoor environmental satisfaction in two LEED offices and its implications in green interior design. Indoor and Built Environment, 21(4), 503–514.
- Armitage, L., Murugan, A., & Kato, H. (2011). Green offices in Australia: a user perception survey. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13(3), 169–180.
- Monfared, I. G., & Sharples, S. (2011). Occupants’ perceptions and expectations of a green office building: a longitudinal case study. Architectural Science Review, 54(4), 344–355.
- Lee, Y. S., & Guerin, D. A. (2010). Indoor environmental quality differences between office types in LEED-certified buildings in the US. Building and Environment, 45(5), 1104–1112.
- Hodgson, M. (2008). Acoustical evaluation of six “green” office buildings. Journal of Green Building, 3(4), 108–118.
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 27
Submitted on: Nov 17, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 20, 2023
Published on: Jul 20, 2023
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Fahriye Hilal Halicioglu, Hande Betul Demirkapi, Kubra Gurel, Nurdan Kasul, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.