Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Navigating the Labyrinth of Intertextuality in the Media: A Qualitative Analysis of Reader Responses Cover

Navigating the Labyrinth of Intertextuality in the Media: A Qualitative Analysis of Reader Responses

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Allen, Graham. Intertextuality. Routledge, 2022.
  2. Brent, Lucia, et al. “The Rhetoric of Google Lens: A Postsymbolic Look at Locative Media.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 40, no. 1, 2021, pp. 75-89. Taylor and Francis online, https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2020.1841452.
  3. Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications, 2016.
  4. Doichyk, Oksana, et al. “Intertextual Satire in Media Discourse. Conceptual Blends.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 24, no. 1, 2026, pp. 99-133. John Benjamins e-Platform, https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00183.doi.
  5. Dumitrica, Delia, and Georgia Gaden Jones. “Developing the ‘Control Imaginary’: Time Magazine’s Symbolic Construction of Digital Technologies.” International Journal of Communication, vol. 14, 2020, pp. 2519-2542.
  6. Eco, Umberto. “Intertextual Irony and Levels of Reading.” On Literature, translated by M. McLaughlin, Harcourt, 2004, pp. 212–235.
  7. Edo, Miquel. “Intertextuality in Nineteenth-century Italian Librettos: To Translate or Not to Translate?” Opera in Translation: Unity and Diversity, edited by Adriana Şerban and Kelly Kar Yue Chan, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2020, pp. 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.153.15edo.
  8. Fairclough, Norman. Media Discourse. Oxford UP, 1995.
  9. Genette, Gerard. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge UP, 1997.
  10. Levko, Oleksandr. “Precedent Units as a Means of Manipulation in Ukrainian Religious Media Discourse: Psycholinguistic Approach.” Psycholinguistics, vol. 28, no. 2, 2020, pp. 99-127. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-28-2-99-127.
  11. Moore, Rebecca. “Drinking the Kool-Aid: The Cultural Transformation of a Tragedy.” Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, vol. 7, no. 2, 2003, pp. 92-100. University of California Press, https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2003.7.2.92.
  12. Moroz, Oksana. “All That Glitter is Not Gold: Examining Challenges of Internationalized Digital Education.” Internationalisation of Higher Education: Policy and Practice, vol. 9, no. 3, 2022, pp. 23-33.
  13. Orr, Mary. Intertextuality: Debates and Contexts. Blackwell, 2003.
  14. Ribeiro, Antonio Sousa. “Satirical Discourse and Intertextuality: The Dialogic Construction of Satirical Authority in Die Fackel.” Oxford German Studies, vol. 45, no 4, 2016, pp. 444-458.
  15. Selivanova, Olena. Сучасна лінгвістика: термінологічна енциклопедія [Modern Linguistics: Terminological Encyclopedia]. Dovkillya-K, 2006.
  16. Stewart, Mary K. “Social Presence in Online Writing Instruction: Distinguishing Between Presence, Comfort, Attitudes, and Learning.” Computers and Composition, vol. 62, no. 6, 2021, pp. 1-16. ScienceDirect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102669.
  17. van Dijk, Teun. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. SAGE, 1998.
  18. Velykoroda, Yuriy. Прецедентні феномени в американському медійному дискурсі (на матеріалі часописів «Time» та «Newsweek»). [Precedent-related Phenomena in American Media Discourse (on the Basis of “Time” and “Newsweek” Magazines)]. LNU, 2012.
  19. Velykoroda, Yuriy.---. “The Nominative Function of Precedent-related Phenomena.” Exploring Linguistics, Literature, and International Communication, vol. 1, no. 1, 2013, pp. 29-31.
  20. Velykoroda, Yuriy.---. “Ludic Function of Precedent-related Phenomena in Media Discourse.” Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, vol. 3, no. 4, 2016, pp. 70-75.
  21. Velykoroda, Yuriy.---. “Conceptual Metaphorisation through Precedent-related Phenomena in Media Discourse.” Studies about Languages, no. 34, 2019, pp. 32-45.
  22. Velykoroda, Yuriy, and Oksana Moroz. “Intertextuality in Media Discourse: A Reader’s Perspective.” ExELL, vol. 9, no. 1, 2021, pp. 56-79. Sciendo, https://doi.org/10.2478/exell-2022-0003.
  23. Vetter, Matthew A., et al. “Assessing the Art + Feminism Edit-a-thon for Wikipedia Literacy, Learning Outcomes, and Critical Thinking.” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 30, no. 6, 2022, pp. 1155-1167. Taylor and Francis Online, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1805772.
  24. Wiggins, Bradley E. The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. Routledge, 2020.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/abcsj-2026-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1841-964X | Journal ISSN: 1841-1487
Language: English
Page range: 148 - 178
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Oksana Moroz, Yuriy Velykoroda, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.