Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Translation and psychometric validation of the Vietnamese versions of the Drinker Inventory of Consequences and Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale Cover

Translation and psychometric validation of the Vietnamese versions of the Drinker Inventory of Consequences and Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. WHO. Unrecorded Alcohol: What the Evidence Tells Us. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
  2. Lincoln M. Alcohol and drinking cultures in Vietnam: a review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;159:1–8.
  3. Kumar S, Gundi M, Atre S, Bich Ngoc L, Nguyen TT, Rammohan A. Alcohol consumption among adults in Vietnam: prevalence, patterns, and its determinants. J Subst Use. 2023;28:57–65.
  4. MacKillop J, Agabio R, Feldstein Ewing SW, et al. Hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorders. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8:80.
  5. Dung TD, Tuc PV, Hien TN. The situation of sleep disturbance among adults drinking alcohol in Thai Binh province in 2020. Thai Binh J Med Pharm. 2021;1:109–113.
  6. Wang Y, Lu H, Hu M, et al. Alcohol consumption in China before and during COVID-19: preliminary results from an online retrospective survey. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:597826.
  7. Houdmont J, Jachens L. English police officers’ alcohol consumption and links with organisational job stressors. Police J. 2022;95:674–690.
  8. Wolitzky-Taylor K, Brown LA, Roy-Byrne P, et al. The impact of alcohol use severity on anxiety treatment outcomes in a large effectiveness trial in primary care. J Anxiety Disord. 2015;30:88–93.
  9. Strid C, Andersson C, Öjehagen A. The influence of hazardous drinking on psychological functioning, stress and sleep during and after treatment in patients with mental health problems: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled intervention study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019128.
  10. WHO. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; 2018.
  11. Nguyen TT, Trevisan M. Vietnam a country in transition: health challenges. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2020;3:60–66.
  12. WHO. WHO Alcohol Brief Intervention Training Manual for Primary Care. 2017.
  13. Reid MC, Fiellin DA, O’Connor PG. Hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1681–1689.
  14. Miller WR. The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC): An Instrument for Assessing Adverse Consequences of Alcohol Abuse: Test Manual. Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 4. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 1995. NIH Publication No. 95-3911.
  15. Treloar H, Martens MP, McCarthy DM. The protective behavioral strategies scale-20: improved content validity of the serious harm reduction subscale. Psychol Assess. 2015;27:340–346.
  16. Forcehimes AA, Tonigan JS, Miller WR, Kenna GA, Baer JS. Psychometrics of the drinker inventory of consequences (DrInC). Addict Behav. 2007;32:1699–1704.
  17. Richards DK, Puentes RP, Gonzales R, Smith JC, Field CA, Morera OF. A psychometric evaluation of the protective behavioral strategies scale-20 among internet samples of adult drinkers. Addict Behav Rep. 2018;8:71–78.
  18. Zhao D, Staton CA, He Q, Mmbaga BT, Vissoci JRN. Cross-culture adaptation and psychometric properties of the DrInC questionnaire in Tanzanian Swahili. Front Public Health. 2018;6:330.
  19. Grazioli VS, Studer J, Larimer ME, et al. Protective behavioral strategies scale-20: psychometric properties of a French and German version among young males in Switzerland. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019;28:e1777.
  20. Friesen EL, Bailey J, Hyett S, et al. Hazardous alcohol use and alcohol-related harm in rural and remote communities: a scoping review. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7:e177–e187.
  21. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–3191.
  22. Borsa JC, Damásio BF, Bandeira DR. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto). 2012;22:423–432.
  23. Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1:185–216.
  24. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806–808.
  25. Ghosh A, Singh P, Das N, Pandit PM, Das S, Sarkar S. Efficacy of brief intervention for harmful and hazardous alcohol use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from low middle-income countries. Addiction. 2022;117:545–558.
  26. Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(1 suppl 1):S124–S128.
  27. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29:489–497.
  28. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–163.
  29. Thorndike RM. Book review: Psychometric theory (3rd ed.) by Jum Nunnally and Ira Bernstein New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994, xxiv + 752 pp. Appl Psychol Meas. 1995;19:303–305.
  30. Savage M. Reliability, split-half. The Sage Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2017:1421.
  31. Jansen M, Doornebosch AJ, de Waal MW, et al. Psychometrics of the observational scales of the Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation (USER): content and structural validity, internal consistency and reliability. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021;97:104509.
  32. Squires JE, Estabrooks CA, Newburn-Cook CV, Gierl M. Validation of the conceptual research utilization scale: an application of the standards for educational and psychological testing in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:107.
  33. Schilling LS, Dixon JK, Knafl KA, Grey M, Ives B, Lynn MR. Determining content validity of a selfreport instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel. Nurs Res. 2007;56:361–366.
  34. Fernández-Gómez E, Martín-Salvador A, Luque-Vara T, Sánchez-Ojeda MA, Navarro-Prado S, Enrique-Mirón C. Content validation through expert judgement of an instrument on the nutritional knowledge, beliefs, and habits of pregnant women. Nutrients. 2020;12:1136.
  35. Sánchez-García M, Lozano-Rojas ÓM, Díaz-Batanero C, Carmona-Márquez J, Rojas-Tejada AJ, Fernández-Calderón F. Spanish adaptation of the protective behavioral strategies scale-20 (S-PBSS-20) and evaluation of its psychometric properties in University students. Psicothema. 2020;32:598–606.
  36. Schwebel FJ, Weinstein AP, Richards DK, Bravo AJ, Pearson MR. Examining cross-country and sex differences on a comprehensive assessment of protective behavioral strategies for alcohol. Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57:47–56.
  37. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.
  38. Kirouac M, Witkiewitz K. Revisiting the drinker inventory of consequences: an extensive evaluation of psychometric properties in two alcohol clinical trials. Psychol Addict Behav. 2018;32:52–63.
  39. Verster JC, Scholey A, van de Loo AJAE, Benson S, Stock AK. Updating the definition of the alcohol hangover. J Clin Med. 2020;9:823.
  40. Moan IS, Halkjelsvik T Socio-demographic differences in alcohol-related work impairment. Addiction. 2021;116:771–779.
  41. El-Gabri D, Nickenig Vissoci JR, Meier BJ, et al. Alcohol stigma as it relates to drinking behaviors and perceptions of drink drivers: a mixed method study in Moshi, Tanzania. Alcohol. 2020;88:73–81.
  42. Park K. New law on prevention and control of alcohol related harms in Vietnam. J Global Health Sci. 2019;1:e49.
  43. Le TKD. Characteristics of traditional Vietnamese family and its influence on communication culture in the family. Anthropol Res Stud. 2021;1:49–64.
  44. Kyriazos T. Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology. 2018;9:2207–2230.
  45. MacCallum R, Widaman K, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:84–99.
  46. Cinelli C, Hazlett C. Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias. J Royal Statist Soc Series B: Statist Methodol. 2019;82:39–67.
  47. Van Trieu N, Uthis P, Suktrakul S. Alcohol dependence and the psychological factors leading to a relapse: a hospital-based study in Vietnam. J Health Res. 2021;35:118–131.
  48. Nhat TV, Uthis P, Watthayu N. Risk factors of hazardous alcohol use among adult males: a systematic review. Nurs Pract Today. 2024;11:124–140.
  49. Chentsova VO, Bravo AJ, Pilatti A, Pautassi RM, Mezquita L, Hogarth L, et al. Age of first use, age of habitual use, and problematic alcohol use: a cross-cultural examination among young adults in seven countries. Int J Mental Health Addict. 2024;22:2747–2765.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/FON-2025-0025 | Journal eISSN: 2544-8994 | Journal ISSN: 2097-5368
Language: English
Page range: 213 - 223
Submitted on: Aug 26, 2025
Accepted on: Sep 16, 2025
Published on: Jul 3, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Trieu Van Nhat, Sudaporn Stithyudhakarn, Penpaktr Uthis, published by Shanxi Medical Periodical Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.