References
- 1. Achten H.H., Vries de B., Jessurun J. (2000), DDDoolz – A Virtual Reality Sketchtool for Early Design, In: Proceedings of CAADRIA Conference, Singapore, p. 451-460.
- 2. Asanowicz A. (2014), The phenomenology and philosophy of simulacra influence on the VR, “Architecturae et Artibus” Vol. 6, p. 5−8.
- 3. Bum C.-H., Mahoney T.Q., Choi C. (2018), A Comparative Analysis of Satisfaction and Sustainable Participation in Actual Leisure Sports and Virtual Reality Leisure Sports, “Sustainability” Vol. 10, 3475.
- 4. Fonseca D., Cavalcanti J., Peña E., Valls V., Sanchez-Sepúlveda M., Moreira F., Navarro I., Redondo E. (2021), Mixed Assessment of Virtual Serious Games Applied in Architectural and Urban Design Education, “Sensors” Vol. 21, 3102.
- 5. Gómez-Tone H.C., Bustamante Escapa J., Bustamante Escapa P., Martin-Gutierrez J. (2021), The Drawing and Perception of Architectural Spaces through Immersive Virtual Reality, “Sustainability” Vol. 13, 6223.
- 6. Karuzaki E., Partarakis N., Patsiouras N., Zidianakis E., Katzourakis A., Pattakos A., Kaplanidi D., Baka E., Cadi N., Magnenat-Thalmann N., Ringas C., Tasiopoulou E., Zabulis X. (2021), Realistic Virtual Humans for Cultural Heritage Applications, “Heritage” Vol. 8, 4148-4171.
- 7. Komarzyńska-Świeściak E., Adams B., Thomas L. (2021), Transition from Physical Design Studio to Emergency Virtual Design Studio. Available Teaching and Learning Methods and Tools—A Case Study, “Buildings” Vol. 11, 312.
- 8. Kurkiewicz D. (2003), Wirtualna architektura – granica wyobraźni, „Czasopismo Techniczne. Architektura” Vol. 100, 8-A.
- 9. Montag C., Diefenbach S. (2018), Towards Homo Digitalis: Important Research Issues for Psychology and the Neurosciences at the Dawn of the Internet of Things and the Digital Society, “Sustainability” Vol. 10, 415.10.3390/su10020415
- 10. Salwierz A., Szymczyk T. (2020), Methods of creating realistic spaces – 3D scanning and 3D modeling, “Journal of Computer Sciences Institute” Vol. 14, p. 101 – 108.
- 11. Shao D., Lee I.-J. (2020), Acceptance and Influencing Factors of Social Virtual Reality in the Urban Elderly, “Sustainability” Vol. 12, 9345.
- 12. Skoczylas O. (2018), Emotional reactions of the respondents compared to different ways of perceiving the square in front of the WICA building of the Lublin University of Technology, “Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych” vol. 14, nr 3.10.35784/teka.1800
- 13. Suchłocka K., Siewczyński B., Szot J. (2020), Architecture in the age of digitalization and coding meanings, “Przestrzeń i Forma” Vol. 44, p. 177-190.
- 14. Świt-Jankowska B. (2010), Współczesne narzędzia pracy architekta a jakość nowo projektowanej przestrzeni mieszkalnej, „Architecturae et Artibus” Vol. 2, no. 2.
- 15. Urbanowicz B., Szuliński T. (2020), Wirtualna rzeczywistość w architekturze. Zastosowania i korzyści, „Builder” Vol. 24, no. 2.10.5604/01.3001.0013.7542
- 16. Van N.T.T., Vrana V., Duy N.T., Minh D.X.H., Dzung P.T., Mondal S.R., Das S. (2020), The Role of Human– Machine Interactive Devices for Post-COVID- 19 Innovative Sustainable Tourism in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, “Sustainability” Vol. 12, 9523.10.3390/su12229523
- 17. https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/pages/technology-driving-innovation-folder/virtual-andaugmented-reality/report.pdf