References
- Åberg-Bengtsson, L., & Ottosson,T. (2006). What lies behind graphicacy? Relating students‘ results on a test of graphically represented quantitative information to formal academic achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20087
- Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
- Altmann, G., Boss, G., & Göser, U. (2018). Wirtschaft & Du: Wirtschaft/Berufs- und Studienorientierung [Economy & You - Economics, Vocational and Study orientation] (Gymnasium, SI, Baden-Württemberg, Druck A, Prüfauflage). Braunschweig: Westermann.
- Aprea, C., & Bayer, D. (2010). Instruktionale Qualität von grafischen Darstellungen in Lehrmitteln: Kriterien zu deren Evaluation: [Instructional quality of graphical representations in teaching materials: Criteria for their evaluation]. Beiträge Zur Lehrerinnen- Und Lehrerbildung, 28(1), 73–83.
- Authors (2019).
- Bauer, M., Hamm-Reinöhl, A., Podes, S., & Riedel, H. (2012). Unterrichtswerk für die Oberstufe Wirtschaft: Märkte, Akteure und Institutionen [Textbook for higher grade level: Economics - Markets, Actors and Institutions] (1. Auflage). Kolleg Politik und Wirtschaft. Bamberg: Buchner, C C.
- Biehahn, M., Jüngling, H., Machoczek, M., Michael, P., & Ottmar, C. (2018). Auer Wirtschaft - Berufs- und Studienorientierung. Ausgabe Baden-Württemberg: Schülerbuch Klasse 8-10 [Auer Economics, Vocational and Study orientation, Textbook 8th-10th grade] (1. Auflage). Stuttgart: Klett.
- Boels, L., Bakker, A., van Dooren, W., & Drijvers, P. (2019). Conceptual difficulties when interpreting histograms: A review. Educational Research Review, 100291.
- Riedel, H. (Ed.) (2018). Wirtschaft & Co: Wirtschaft für das Gymnasium [Economics & Co, Economics for Gymnasium] (1. Auflage, 1. Druck (Prüfauflage)). Bamberg: C.C. Buchner Verlag.
- Cohn, E., Cohn, S., Balch, D. C., & Bradley, J. (2001). Do Graphs Promote Learning in Principles of Economics? The Journal of Economic Education, 32(4), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480109596110
- Cook, M. (2011). Teachers‘ Use of Visual Representations in the Science Classroom. Science Education International, 22(3), 175–184.
- Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
- Davies, P., & Mangan, J. (2007). Threshold concepts and the integration of understanding in economics. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 711–726.
- Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015). Teachers Facing the Dilemma of Multiple Representations Being Aid and Obstacle for Learning: Evaluations of Tasks and Theme-Specific Noticing. Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik, 36(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-014-0068-3
- Galesic, M., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2011). Graph literacy: A cross-cultural comparison. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 31(3), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10373805
- Gebre, E. H., & Polman, J. L. (2016). Developing young adults‘ representational competence through infographic-based science news reporting. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2667–2687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1258129
- Glazer, N. (2011). Challenges with graph interpretation: A review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.605307
- Harris, R. L. (2000). Information graphics: A comprehensive illustrated reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hey, J. D. (2005). I Teach Economics, Not Algebra and Calculus. The Journal of Economic Education, 36(3), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.36.3.292-304
- Huber, M., & Stallhofer, B. (2010). Diskontinuierliche Texte im Geografieunterricht [Discontinuous texts in geography teaching]. ProLesen. Auf Dem Weg Zur Leseschule–Leseförderung in Den Gesell-schaftswissenschaftlichen Fächern. Donauwörth: Auer, 223–240.
- Isberner, M.-B., Richter, T., Maier, J., Knuth-Herzig, K., Horz, H., & Schnotz, W. (2013). Comprehending conflicting science-related texts: graphs as plausibility cues. Instructional Science, 41(5), 849–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9261-2
- Jägerskog, A.-S. (2020). Making Possible by Making Visible: Learning through Visual Representations in Social Science. Stockholm: Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Education, Stockholm University.
- Kochendörfer, J. (2018). Startklar! (Oldenburg) - Wirtschaft/Berufs- und Studienorientierung: Schülerbuch Klasse 8-10 [Economics, Vocational and Study orientation, Textbook 8th-10th grade]. Berlin: Oldenburg Schulbuchverlag.
- Kosslyn, S. M. (1999). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate (4. print). A Bradford book. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Kotzebue, L. von, Gerstl, M., & Nerdel, C. (2015). Common Mistakes in the Construction of Diagrams in Biological Contexts. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9419-9
- Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00021-X
- Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968.
- Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students Becoming Chemists: Developing Representationl Competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Models and Modeling in Science Education: Vol. 1. Visualization in Science Education (pp. 121–145). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_8
- Kuckartz, U. (2016). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung [Qualitative Content Analysis: methods, practice, computer support] (3., überarbeitete Auflage). Grundlagentexte Methoden. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa.
- Lai, K., Cabrera, J., Vitale, J. M., Madhok, J., Tinker, R., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Measuring Graph Comprehension, Critique, and Construction in Science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 665–681.
- Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of picture in prose. In D.M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustrations (Vol. 1) (51–114). Harrisonburg, VA: R. R. Donnelley & Sons.
- Ludewig, U., Lambert, K., Dackermann, T., Scheiter, K., & Möller, K. (2019). Influences of basic numerical abilities on graph reading performance. Psychological Research, 1–13.
- Nitz, S., Ainsworth, S. E., Nerdel, C., & Prechtl, H. (2014). Do student perceptions of teaching predict the development of representational competence and biological knowledge? Learning and Instruction, 31, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.003
- Ögren, M., Nyström, M., & Jarodzka, H. (2017). There’s more to the multimedia effect than meets the eye: is seeing pictures believing? Instructional Science, 45(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9397-6
- Peterman, K., Cranston, K. A., Pryor, M., & Kermish-Allen, R. (2015). Measuring Primary Students’ Graph Interpretation Skills Via a Performance Assessment: A case study in instrument development. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2787–2808. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1105399
- Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2017). Making connections among multiple graphical representations of fractions: sense-making competencies enhance perceptual fluency, but not vice versa. Instructional Science, 45(3), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9403-7
- Ring, M., Brahm, T., & Randler, C. (2019). Do difficulty levels matter for graphical literacy? A performance assessment study with authentic graphs. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1787–1804. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1640915
- Roberts, K. L., Norman, R. R., Duke, N. K., Morsink, P., Martin, N. M., & Knight, J. A. (2013). Diagrams, Timelines, and Tables-Oh, My!: Fostering Graphical Literacy. The Reading Teacher, 67(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1174
- Scheiter, K., & Eitel, A. (2015). Signals foster multimedia learning by supporting integration of highlighted text and diagram elements. Learning and Instruction, 36, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.002
- Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., & Hesse, F. W. (2014). Extending multimedia research: How do prerequisite knowledge and reading comprehension affect learning from text and pictures. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.022
- Schnotz, W. (2001). Wissenserwerb mit Multimedia [Knowledge acquisition with multimedia]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 29(4), 292–318.
- Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2008). External and internal representations in the acquisition and use of knowledge: visualization effects on mental model construction. Instructional Science, 36(3), 175–190.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9029-2
- Schopf, C., Raso, A., & Kahr, M. (2019). How to give effective explanations: Guidelines for business education, discussion of their scope and their application to teaching operations research. RISTAL-Research in Subject-Matter Teaching and Learning, 2, 32–50.
- Seufert, T. (2019). Training for Coherence Formation When Learning From Text and Picture and the Interplay With Learners‘ Prior Knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00193
- Shah, P., Freedman, E. G., & Vekiri, I. (2005). The Comprehension of Quantitative Information in Graphical Displays. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology. The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 426–476). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610448.012
- Stern, E., Aprea, C., & Ebner, H. G. (2003). Improving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00020-8
- Stieff, M., Scopelitis, S., Lira, M. E., & Desutter, D. (2016). Improving Representational Competence with Concrete Models. Science Education, 100(2), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21203
- Strippel, C., Tomalla, L., & Sommer, K. (2018). A cross-subject content analysis of science textbooks using the understandings about scientific inquiry rubrics. RISTAL. Research in Subject-Matter Teaching and Learning, 1, 66–81.
- Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the Book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of text-books. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
- VanderMolen, J., & Spivey, C. (2017). Creating infographics to enhance student engagement and communication in health economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 48(3), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2017.1320605
- Westelinck, K. D., Valcke, M., Craene, B. de, & Kirschner, P. (2005). Multimedia learning in social sciences: Limitations of external graphical representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.030
- Winn, W. (1987). Charts, graphs, and diagrams in educational materials. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustrations (Vol. 1) (pp. 152–198). Harrisonburg, VA: R. R. Donnelley & Sons.
- Zimenkova, T. (2008). Citizenship Through Faith and Feelings: Defining Citizenship in Citizenship Education. An Exemplary Textbook Analysis. JSSE - Journal of Social Science Education, Transformation and Citizenship Education II, 9(1), 81–111. https://doi.org/10.4119/JSSE-432