Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quantifying thermal comfort improvement by palm tree-based street greening, in hot and dry climate Cover

Quantifying thermal comfort improvement by palm tree-based street greening, in hot and dry climate

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Figures & Tables

FIGURE 1.

Study area: S1 – site of the traditional individual residential fabric, S2 – site of the collective housing fabricSource: own work.

FIGURE 2.

Location of the studied streets in Sidi Okba: a – macroscale of the country, b – microscale of Biskra ProvinceSource: own work.

FIGURE 3.

A multifunctional portable device Testo 480-AG 501 1ST, 0563 4800Source: own work.

FIGURE 4.

Model domain for the study in ENVI-met in current situation for Street Str1: a – 2D, b – 3D Source: ENVI-met.

FIGURE 5.

Model domain for the study in ENVI-met: a – current situation, b – proposed for Street Str2 Source: ENVI-met.

FIGURE 6.

Validation of the simulation models on Street 1 (St1, St2) and Street 2 (St3, St4) Source: own work.

FIGURE 7.

Visualization outputs generated by Leonardo’s (Street 1) modeling software for the current situationSource: Leonardo from the ENVI-met simulation program.

FIGURE 8.

Visualization outputs generated by Leonardo’s (Street 2) modeling software for the current simulation scenarioSource: Leonardo from the ENVI-met simulation program.

FIGURE 9.

Visualization outputs generated by Leonardo’s (Street 2) for the proposed simulation scenario Source: Leonardo from the ENVI-met simulation program.

FIGURE 10.

Comparison of the daily average air temperature in Streets Str1 and Str2: current versus proposed scenariosSource: own work.

FIGURE 11.

Comparison of the daily average relative humidity in Str1 and Str2: current versus proposed scenariosSource: own work.

FIGURE 12.

Comparison of the daily average wind speed in Streets Str1 and Str2: current versus proposed scenariosSource: own work.

FIGURE 13.

Comparison of the daily average mean radiant temperature (MRT) in Streets Str1 and Str2: current versus proposed scenariosSource: own work.

FIGURE 14.

Comparison of the daily average physiological equivalent temperature (PET) in Streets Str1 and Str2: current versus proposed scenariosSource: own work.

FIGURE 15.

Comparison of the daily average new standard effective temperature in Streets Str1 and Str2: current versus proposed scenariosSource: own work.

Simulation’s settings

Situation (geographic coordinates)latitude: 34°75′, longitude: 5°57′
Simulation dateJuly 10–12, 2024
Simulation start time06:00:00 a.m.
Initial temperature31°C
Simulation duration48 hours
Relative humidity at 2 m above ground [%]20%
Wind speed at 10 m2 m⸱s−1
Wind direction135°
Specific humidity in 2,500 m8.00 g·kg−1

Comparison of the daily average air temperature for Streets Str1 and Str2

StationHour
6:008:0010:0012:0014:0016:0018:0020:0022:000:002:004:00
St131.2633.7537.3840.1942.7041.4440.1638.1636.1834.2932.4230.53
St231.7534.6837.9341.2844.3743.5941.5639.6637.3635.5232.8431.05
St334.7538.7942.5646.7847.8246.8244.1741.6739.0736.8634.7732.39
st435.1839.3643.9548.4749.5747.8545.1942.3339.8837.5935.1832.96
St3′32.8637.0140.1643.5945.5944.0742.5540.0037.9135.8533.7831.62
St4′33.8837.9541.9046.0547.1345.7942.9540.7138.5236.5434.1831.85

Comparison of the daily average physiological equivalent temperature for Streets Str1 and Str2

StationHour
6:008:0010:0012:0014:0016:0018:0020:0022:000:002:004:00
St128.0045.7055.8058.3060.7057.7047.0032.8031.1029.5027.8026.20
St228.4046.2055.9059.0062.0059.3047.9034.1032.1030.5028.1026.60
St330.3048.7058.9062.9063.7060.5048.8035.6032.9031.0029.2027.10
St430.6049.1059.9064.2064.9061.0050.8039.0035.9033.2030.0027.60
St3′29.0047.2056.9060.3062.1058.6047.7034.9032.2030.5028.8026.80
St4′30.4047.0056.4061.3063.1060.7049.4035.5033.4031.6029.5026.70

Sites and measurement stations

SiteStreetStreet trees
number / type
S1 Traditional individual residential fabric
Section on the street (Str1)Measurement point (St1, St2)
S2 Collective housing fabriMeasurement point (St3, St4)2 palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera)1 berry tree1 Ficus retusa
Section on the street (Str2)

Temperature for current situation scenario

StreetStationTypeMin temperature [°C]Max temperature [°C]
Str1St1field measurement30.5342.70
St231.0544.37
Str2St332.3947.82
St432.9649.57
St3′simulation (greening)31.6245.59
St4′31.8547.13

Comparison of the daily average relative humidity for Streets Str1 and Str2

StationHour
6:008:0010:0012:0014:0016:0018:0020:0022:000:002:004:00
St144.1643.3438.1732.8429.7127.9730.1233.5035.7237.7439.7041.66
St242.3041.9536.2630.9428.0826.7728.6232.2134.2336.0437.7939.54
St325.0423.9519.8915.9912.6511.0913.2216.5918.8821.0723.2525.44
St423.1822.8218.0614.9111.0510.0612.1115.1917.1820.0722.0524.23
St3′32.8830.0726.0521.9319.2318.0820.0623.2525.2727.7330.1831.98
St4′29.8727.3923.1619.5517.2815.9018.3421.5423.7525.8828.0030.13

Comparison of the daily average mean radiant temperature for Streets Str1 and Str2

StationHour
6:008:0010:0012:0014:0016:0018:0020:0022:000:002:004:00
St127.0136.2846.0753.4854.6150.5644.1232.1531.1329.0926.9125.20
St229.0440.1449.5756.6857.6254.0147.3036.1134.1232.1630.8628.70
St336.1153.8567.0375.0575.6267.4957.1846.4243.2340.4939.0738.26
St439.8557.3670.3377.9979.7171.6160.4050.9446.9344.4943.1541.25
St3′32.3643.4653.5064.8366.9860.1649.5639.4136.0234.0332.1730.17
St4′34.0046.1957.0568.1671.5563.1552.6842.6738.8435.9233.8532.24

Summary of the validation of simulated models for Street 1 (St1, St2) and Street 2 (St3, St4)

StationRegression equationR2RMSE [°C]MAE [°C]RMSPE [%]
St1y = 1.0164x + 0.34570.89261.601.194.33
St2y = 1.2529x – 7.82960.89312.151.745.79
St3y = 1.0676x – 2.55450.99801.501.214.09
St4y = 0.9474x + 1.95830.99901.421.143.87

Comparison of the daily average new standard effective temperature for Streets Str1 and Str2

StationHour
6:008:0010:0012:0014:0016:0018:0020:0022:000:002:004:00
St125.5043.6051.5054.1056.6053.6044.8031.7029.6027.5025.4023.20
St226.0044.0051.6054.8057.9055.3045.6033.2030.8028.8025.7023.70
St328.245.854.858.959.756.646.233.731.22926.924.30
St428.546.155.860.361.0057.146.634.131.929.727.225.00
St3′26.744.752.756.258.154.645.333.630.628.526.423.9
St4′25.742.249.754.155.653.344.83431.128.325.221.9

Comparison of the daily average wind speed for Streets Str1 and Str2

StationHour
6:008:0010:0012:0014:0016:0018:0020:0022:000:002:004:00
St10.180.190.190.170.170.150.140.140.150.150.150.16
St20.480.490.470.470.450.440.440.440.440.450.450.45
St30.840.860.860.840.820.800.790.790.790.790.790.79
St41.021.011.021.011.011.011.011.011.011.011.011.01
St3′1.101.121.111.091.081.071.071.071.071.071.071.06
St4′1.291.291.301.291.291.291.291.301.301.301.301.30
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/srees.10366 | Journal eISSN: 2543-7496 | Journal ISSN: 1732-9353
Language: English
Page range: 158 - 183
Submitted on: Mar 15, 2026
Accepted on: Apr 23, 2026
Published on: Jul 7, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Naama KHELIFA, Moufida BOUKHABLA, Soumia BOUZAHER, published by Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.