Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Life cycle assessment in the Visegrad Group: a bibliometric analysis Cover

Life cycle assessment in the Visegrad Group: a bibliometric analysis

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Ansorge, L., & Beránková, T. (2017). LCA water footprint AWARE characterization factor based on local specific conditions. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6 (4), 13‒20. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n4p13
  2. Aparna, K., & Baskar, K. (2024). Scientometric analysis and panoramic review on life cycle assessment in the construction industry. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 9 (4), 96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01402-y
  3. Asubiaro, T., Onaolapo, S., & Mills, D. (2024). Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage. Scientometrics, 129 (3), 1469‒1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04948-x
  4. Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative science studies, 1 (1), 377‒386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
  5. Bjørn, A., Owsianiak, M., Molin, C., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2018a). LCA History. In M. Z. Hauschild, R. K. Rosenbaum, & S. I. Olsen (Eds), Life cycle assessment: theory and practice (pp. 17–30). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_3
  6. Bjørn, A., Owsianiak, M., Molin, C., & Laurent, A. (2018b). Main characteristics of LCA. In M. Z. Hauschild, R. K. Rosenbaum & S. I. Olsen (Eds), Life cycle assessment: theory and practice (pp. 9–16). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_2
  7. Bodunrin, M. O., Burman, N. W., Croft, J., Engelbrecht, S., Goga, T., Ladenika, A. O., MacGregor, O. S., Maepa, M., & Harding, K. G. (2018). The availability of life-cycle assessment, water footprinting, and carbon footprinting studies in Brazil. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, 1701‒1707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1484-2
  8. Brent, A. C., Rohwer, M. B., Friedrich, E., & Blottnitz, H. V. (2002). Status of life cycle assessment and engineering research in South Africa. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7, 167‒172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994051
  9. Burman, N. W., Croft, J., Engelbrecht, S., Ladenika, A. O., MacGregor, O. S., Maepa, M., Bodunrin, M. O., & Harding, K. G. (2018). Life-cycle assessment, water footprinting, and carbon footprinting in Portugal. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, 1693‒1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1483-3
  10. Carrión-Mero, P., Montalván-Burbano, N., Herrera-Franco, G., Domínguez-Granda, L., Bravo-Montero, L., & Morante-Carballo, F. (2022). Research trends in groundwater and stable isotopes. Water, 14 (19), 3173. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193173
  11. Croft, J., Engelbrecht, S., Ladenika, A. O., MacGregor, O. S., Maepa, M., Bodunrin, M. O., Burman, N. W., Goga, T., & Harding, K. G. (2019). The availability of life-cycle studies in Sweden. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24, 6‒11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1510-4
  12. Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17 (1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059
  13. Čuček, L., Klemeš, J. J., & Kravanja, Z. (2012). A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 34, 9‒20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.036
  14. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285‒296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  15. Dunmade, I. (2019, 8–10 March). Lifecycle assessment education in Nigeria: An exploratory evaluation of the trend. Procedia Manufacturing, The 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Materials Processing and Manufacturing, Sun City, South Africa, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.065
  16. Eck, N. J. van, & Waltman, L. (2007). VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In R. Decker, & H. J. Lenz (Eds), Advances in data analysis (pp. 299–306). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70981-7_34
  17. Eck, N. van, & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523‒538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  18. Eck, N. J. van, & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau & D. Wolfram (Eds), Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice (pp. 285–320). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
  19. Engelbrecht, S., Ladenika, A. O., MacGregor, O. S., Maepa, M., Bodunrin, M. O., Burman, N. W., Croft, J., Goga, T., & Harding, K. G. (2018). A discussion on the availability of life-cycle assessment studies in New Zealand. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, 1708‒1713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1485-1
  20. Fava, J. A., Smerek, A., Heinrich, A. B., Morrison, L. (2014). The role of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Development and Application. In W. Klöpffer (Ed.), Background and future prospects in Life Cycle Assessment (pp. 39–83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_2
  21. Gaurav, G., Singh, A. B., Mistry, S., Gupta, S., Dangayach, G. S., & Meena, M. L. (2021). Recent progress of scientific research on life cycle assessment. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 3161‒3170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.208
  22. Gaurav, G., Singh, A. B., Khandelwal, C., Gupta, S., Kumar, S., Meena, M. L., & Dangayach, G. S. (2023). Global development on LCA research: a bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2021. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 14 (1), 1‒19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSESD.327791
  23. Ghosh, S. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of social Life Cycle Assessment (2008–2022). In R. Al Khaddar, S.K. Singh, N. D. Kaushika, R. K. Tomar & S. K. Jain (Eds), Recent developments in energy and environmental engineering (pp. 75–86). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1388-6_6
  24. Güereca, L. P., Sosa, R. O., Gilbert, H. E., & Reynaga, N. S. (2015). Life cycle assessment in Mexico: overview of development and implementation. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20, 311‒317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0844-9
  25. Harding, K. G., Friedrich, E., Jordaan, H., Roux, B. le, Notten, P., Russo, V., Suppen-Reynaga, N., Laan, M. van der, & Goga, T. (2021). Status and prospects of life cycle assessments and carbon and water footprinting studies in South Africa. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26, 26‒49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01839-0
  26. Hauschild, M. Z., Rosenbaum, R. K., Olsen, S. I. (2018). Life Cycle Assessment theory and practice. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3
  27. He, X., & Yu, D. (2020). Research trends in life cycle assessment research: A 20-year bibliometric analysis (1999–2018). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 85, 106461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106461
  28. Hellweg, S., & Milà i Canals, L. (2014). Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science, 344 (6188), 1109‒1113. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248361
  29. Herrera-Franco, G., Carrión-Mero, P., Montalván-Burbano, N., Mora-Frank, C., & Berrezueta, E. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of groundwater’s life cycle assessment research. Water, 14 (7), 1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071082
  30. Hodgkinson, G. P., & Ford, J. K. (2014). Narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic reviews: what are the differences and why do they matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35 (S1), S1‒S5. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1918
  31. Hou, Q., Mao, G., Zhao, L., Du, H., & Zuo, J. (2015). Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20, 541‒555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0846-2
  32. International Organization for Standardization [ISO]. (2015). Environmental management systems. Requirements with guidance for use (ISO 14001).
  33. Isah, M. E., Zhang, Z., Matsubae, K., & Itsubo, N. (2024). Bibliometric analysis and visualisation of research on life cycle assessment in Africa (1992–2022). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 29 (7), 1339‒1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02313-x
  34. Jia, X., Varbanov, P. S., Klemeš, J. J., & Wan Alwi, S. R. (2019). Water availability footprint addressing water quality. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 7 (1), 72‒86. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d6.0223
  35. Kacprzak, M., Neczaj, E., Fijałkowski, K., Grobelak, A., Grosser, A., Worwag, M., Rorat, A., Brattebo, H., Almås, Å., & Singh, B. R. (2017). Sewage sludge disposal strategies for sustainable development. Environmental Research, 156, 39‒46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.010
  36. Kargarzadeh, H., Mariano, M., Gopakumar, D., Ahmad, I., Thomas, S., Dufresne, A., Huang, J., & Lin, N. (2018). Advances in cellulose nanomaterials. Cellulose, 25 (4), 2151–2189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1723-5
  37. Karuppiah, K., Sankaranarayanan, B., & Ali, S. M. (2023). Evaluating the challenges to life cycle assessment using best-worst method and decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 42 (1), e13991. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13991
  38. Ključnikov, A., Siwiec, D., Pacana, A., & Lacko, J. (2023). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of heavy vehicles used in the mining industry. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 28 (3), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v28i3.03
  39. Klöpffer, W., & Grahl, B. (2014). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A guide to best practice. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527655625
  40. Koblianska, I., Kalachevska, L., & Schlauderer, R. (2024). Agricultural life cycle assessment: a system-wide bibliometric research. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 10 (1), 46‒72. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2024.10.01.03
  41. Kočí, V., Benešová, E., & Rajchl, A. (2019). Porovnání environmentálních dopadů skladování a dopravy jablek do ČR [Comparison of environmental impacts of importing and storing apples in the Czech Republic]. ENTECHO, 1, 13‒19. https://doi.org/10.35933/ENTECHO.2019.06.002
  42. Kráľová, N., Šerešová, M., & Kočí, V. (2020). Porovnání environmentálních dopadů různých typů jogurtových kelímků [Comparison of environmental impacts of different types of yoghurt cups]. ENTECHO, 1, 6‒9. https://doi.org/10.35933/ENTECHO.2020.02
  43. Maepa, M., Bodunrin, M. O., Burman, N. W., Croft, J., Engelbrecht, S., Ladenika, A. O., MacGregor, O. S., & Harding, K. G. (2017). Life cycle assessments in Nigeria, Ghana, and Ivory Coast. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22, 1159‒1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1292-0
  44. Martinho, V. J. P. D. (2023). Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA): comparing outputs for bibliographic coupling and citation links. Heliyon, 9 (11), e21182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21182
  45. Matos, C., Junkes, V. H., Lermen, F. H., Magalhães, R. F. D., Matias, G. D. S., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Lenzi, G. G., & Siqueira, H. V. (2024). Life cycle sustainability assessment of the agrifood chain: empirical review and bibliometrics. Production, 34, e20230043. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20230043
  46. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation (Vol. 9). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3714-7
  47. Montori, V. M., Wilczynski, N. L., Morgan, D., Haynes, R. B., & the Hedges Team. (2003). Systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of location and citation counts. BMC Medicine, 1, 1‒7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-1-2
  48. Moutik, B., Summerscales, J., Graham-Jones, J., & Pemberton, R. (2023). Life cycle assessment research trends and implications: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 15 (18), 13408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813408
  49. Nie, Z. (2013). Development and application of life cycle assessment in China over the last decade. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 1435‒1439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0591-3
  50. Odey, G., Adelodun, B., Kim, S. H., & Choi, K. S. (2021). Status of environmental life cycle assessment (LCA): A case study of South Korea. Sustainability, 13 (11), 6234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116234
  51. Pavlů, T., Kočí, V., & Hájek, P. (2019). Environmental assessment of two use cycles of recycled aggregate concrete. Sustainability, 11 (21), 6185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216185
  52. Pryshlakivsky, J., & Searcy, C. (2013). Fifteen years of ISO 14040: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 115‒123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.038
  53. Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., & Bras, B. (2008). A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment: Part 2: impact assessment and interpretation. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, 374‒388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9
  54. Sasvari, P., & Urbanovics, A. (2023). The current situation of MDPI publications? Findings from the EU-27 Member States. In Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2023, CEEeGov’23 (pp. 191–197). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3603304.3604071
  55. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14 (3), 207‒222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  56. Villagrán, E., Romero-Perdomo, F., Numa-Vergel, S., Galindo-Pacheco, J. R., & Salinas-Velandia, D. A. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment in protected agriculture: Where are we now, and where should we go next? Horticulturae, 10 (1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10010015
  57. Yılmaz, Y., & Seyis, S. (2021). Mapping the scientific research of the life cycle assessment in the construction industry: A scientometric analysis. Building and Environment, 204, 108086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108086
  58. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18 (3), 429‒472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/srees.10055 | Journal eISSN: 2543-7496 | Journal ISSN: 1732-9353
Language: English
Page range: 144 - 169
Submitted on: Nov 5, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 14, 2025
Published on: Jun 30, 2025
Published by: Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Libor Ansorge, Dagmar Vološinová, Robert Kořínek, published by Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.