The number of immigrants has been increasing recently. According to the World Migration Report (1), the number of immigrants is 271,642,105 in the world; fourteen percent of this number was under the age of 20. The immigration rate from Syria is higher than in most other countries due to long-term conflict-induced displacement (1). Turkey is one of the world’s largest host countries that Syrians constitute a large proportion of immigrants with 3,639,572 (1, 2). 1,728,540 (47.4%) of these people are children between 0-18 (2). These immigrants have to cope with both pre-migration stressors like the effect of war (3) and post-migration issues like acculturation (4). The migration and its accompanying stressors may relate to their mental health problems (5).
Turkey hosted 677,917 Syrian adolescents in the 10-14 age range. Adolescence is a lifespan in which requires many developmental tasks. This period can be more complicated for immigrant youth facing migration difficulties. Acculturation influences developmental processes. Developmental contextualism is based on the defining idea of an interaction between the organism and the context (6). Researches examining this interaction showed that acculturation is associated with psychological problems (7), ethnic identity development (8), peer acceptance (9), and peer attachment (10). Immigrant adolescents face an acculturation process that impacts their ethnic identity and peer relationships associated with their mental health.
Mental health
Different types of traumatic events (e.g., bereavement, neglect, school violence) affect adolescents’ mental health (11). The forced migration process is a traumatic event that might be riskier with bereavement, economic loss, cultural shock, and conflict. The result of a meta-analysis emphasized downward mobility or underemployment because migration is related to negative mental health (12). Immigrant adolescents’ researches showed that migration was related to many types of negative mental health problems such as schizophrenia (13), anxiety (14), PTSD, and depression (15). Gutmann et al. (16) revealed that internalizing and externalizing problems were higher among immigrant adolescents than their native peers. The research with war-affected immigrant adolescents in Turkey emphasized a higher level of mental problems like post-traumatic stress disorder (17). It specified that the most significant factor on Syrian adolescents’ mental health is the loss of loved ones in pre-migration and the loss of culture and support in post-migration these (18). The post-migration process and accompanying issues were examined in this research.
Acculturation is a process of change that results from contact between groups and individuals of different cultures (19). Berry (4) defined four types of acculturation: integration, assimilation, separation, and marginalization. In both assimilation and marginalization, individuals are not attached to either the host or ethnic culture. Researches have shown that these two statuses were related to negative mental health outcomes (21, 22). On the other hand, attachment to cultural identity is related to a lower level of depression (23), better well-being (24), low social anxiety (22), and better mental health (25). Understanding the immigrants’ acculturation process is critical in delivering health care and other services to them (26).
Perceived discrimination
It is suggested that migration research underscore the importance of taking into account the stressful social conditions of everyday life because migration can be related to mental health problems (27). Perceived discrimination is broadly defined as an individual’s perception of being treated unfairly by other people due to personal attributes such as race, ethnicity, age, gender, socioeconomic status, weight, sexual orientation, or other characteristics (28). It has impacted the mental health of ethnic minorities as a chronic stressor (29). Research has shown that perceived discrimination is associated with the emergence of depressive symptoms (30, 31), lower well-being (32) and life satisfaction (33), higher levels of violent behavior (34), alienation, and risky behaviors (35). Besides, the research has shown that increased acculturation is associated with decreased perceived discrimination (36-38). Therefore, it is critical to consider the relationship between them due to their importance in the acculturation process.
Peer relationship: attachment and support
Adolescence is a critical life period in developing peer relationships (39). Peer relationships might be more important for immigrant adolescents during the acculturation process. They are separated from their social network, which decreases their accustomed level of support (40). Therefore, peer relationships should also be evaluated for contributing to the acculturation process for immigrant adolescents. The research investigated the peer relationship with different heading such as quality of the relationship (41), peer dynamics, peer popularity, and deviant peer affiliation (42), or peer connectedness (43). Peer attachment and peer support related to positive mental health outcomes (44, 45) are usually used to focus on peer relationships' adaptation dimension (46).
Social support and attachment are crucial for mental health and acculturation (47-50). For example, it is reported that social support from peers has a positive relationship with health-related quality of life (51), mental health (47), self-esteem (52), less internalizing problems (53), and social anxiety (54) among immigrant adolescents. Similarly, peer attachment has negative correlations with depressive symptoms and positive correlations with a sense of coherence (48). Moreover, both peer social support and peer attachment contribute to the acculturation process’ success (50, 55, 56). High levels of social relations with peers having the same ethnic origin might be opening up opportunities to behave by one’s cultural habits. This might increase discordance with the host culture and reduce acculturative stress (27, 57). It specified that social environments’ ethnic composition affect interpersonal relationships (58-61). In this research, data were obtained from immigrant-dense social environments, contrary to researches mostly obtained from immigrant-sparse environments.
Ethnic identity
Identity formation is an essential developmental task during adolescence. Thus, immigrant adolescents might experience a conflict between ethnic and host cultural identity. Ethnic identity is defined as individuals’ degree of belongingness and feelings about the heritage culture group (62).
On the other hand, bicultural identity is defined as knowing the language, lifestyle characteristics, and patterns of interpersonal behavior of two distinct cultural groups (67). It is positively affected well-being and negative effects acculturation stress (68). Besides, bicultural identification has a negative relationship with depression and anxiety (69). But it is thought that peer relationships might affect the development of identity and mental health. Phinney (63) suggested three stages model of ethnic identity development. First, unexamined ethnic identity individuals have unexamined positive or negative views of their ethnic group. Second, ethnic identity search individuals have begun a search into what it means to be a group member and achieved ethnic identity—individuals have explored their ethnic group membership. They are clear as to the meaning of ethnicity in their life. Acculturation perspective adapting to the host culture has been related to positive mental health (64, 65). These results consistently indicate that a higher level of ethnic identity is a protective factor for depression (22) and substance use (66).
As a result, the present research aims to examine the effect of peer relationships (peer attachment, social support), ethnic identity, and perceived discrimination on immigrant adolescents’ mental health. It is expected that peer attachment, ethnic identity, and social support might have buffering roles for mental health problems, whereas perceived discrimination might be a risk factor.
Based on the results of the studies mentioned above, the hypotheses of the study were as follows: (a) perceived discrimination will positively affect emotional problems and depression; (b) ethnic identity (both Syrian and Turkish) will negatively affect emotional problems and depression; (c) social support will negatively affect emotional problems, and depression (d) peer attachment (to both Syrian and Turkish peers) will negatively affect emotional problems and depression. To test these hypotheses, two hierarchical regression models were used.
Method
Procedure
Data for this study were collected from Syrian immigrant adolescents. Both ethical permissions for the study and the consent of school principals were obtained before the study. Parental consent form (in Arabic and Turkish) was sent to the homes, and none refused. All adolescents of the current sample had Arabic as their native language. Therefore, data were collected in Arabic. The researcher, together with an Arabic translator visited the schools for data collection. Participants were informed about the purpose of the study, the opportunity to refuse or discontinue participation at any time. They completed the questionnaires in a course hour.
Participants
Syrian students constituted the biggest immigrant group in Turkish education system when compared to students with other national backgrounds (70). The sample included 226 Syrian immigrants (X̄ age=13.31, SD=1.67, 70.8 % girls) aged between 10-18 who attended two different secondary schools for immigrant students only. The education was held in Arabic which is their home country language. 11.30% of them live separately from either their mother, father, or both. The minimum sample size was calculated using the formula suggested by Tabachnick and Fidell (71). According to this “50 + 8m” where “m” is the number of factors (in the present study m=6), so the minimum sample size is 106 for the current study.
Participants were living in a homogeneous social environment where the Syrian proportion is much higher resembling their home country and different from the rest of the region. For instance, all store signs are written in Arabic and schools provide education in Arabic for students. Immigrant adolescents have limited opportunity to meet a few Turkish peers in out of school environment. Thus, the participants seemed to have a limited chance for acculturation.
School principals and parents gave the approval for participation of the students. The study’s aim, confidentiality, opportunity to refuse or discontinue participation at any time were explained to the all participants. All students accepted participation and completed the research forms.
Measures
Demographic information. Adolescents reported on their demographic information, including their gender, age, people they are living with, the number of siblings, Turkish proficiency level, the duration of living in Turkey, the duration of schooling in Turkey.
Perceived discrimination. Perceived discrimination was measured using a five-item scale, developed by International Comparative Study of Ethnocultural Youth (72). The items were answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) strongly agree (5). Sample item includes “I do not feel accepted by Turkish people”. Higher scores reflected higher levels of perceived discrimination.
Social support. Social support from classmates was measured using eight items (73). The items were answered 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from totally disagree (1) totally agree (4). Sample item includes “I feel connected to the class”. The items assessed different aspects of emotional support, and higher scores reflected a higher level of emotional support.
Depression. Depression was measured using eight-item version of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (74). It is the short version of CES-D 20 (75). The items were answered 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from (1) not at all to (5) often. Sample item includes “I felt like crying”. Higher scores reflected a higher level of depressive symptoms. The means, standard deviations, and bivariate correlations between the variables are presented in Table 1. Inspection of bivariate correlations showed that depression has significant correlations with emotional problems and perceived discriminations and had a negative correlation with Turkish peer attachment. Likewise, emotional problems had a significant positive correlation with depression and perceived discrimination and had a negative correlation with Turkish peer attachment. Besides, both Syrian and Turkish peer attachment had positive correlations with social support from classmates. Dramatically, Turkish ethnic identity had a positive correlation to both emotional problems and depression.
TABLE 1.
Percentages of student samples in different demographic groups
| N | % | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||||||||
| Female | 158 | 70.8 | ||||||||
| Male | 68 | 29.2 | ||||||||
| Living time in Turkey | ||||||||||
| Less than one year | 19 | 8.5 | ||||||||
| Between 1-3 years | 162 | 72.7 | ||||||||
| More than 3 years | 42 | 18.8 | ||||||||
| Proficiency of Turkish | ||||||||||
| Very well | 66 | 32.2 | ||||||||
| Somewhat | 112 | 13.2 | ||||||||
| Not at all | 27 | 54.6 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | M | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Depression | 1 | 19.06 | 6.30 | |||||||
| 2. Emotional problems | .34** | 1 | 9.22 | 2.36 | ||||||
| 3. Social support | .11 | .01 | 1 | 25.53 | 5.11 | |||||
| 4. Peer attachment (Syrian) | .02 | .06 | .29** | 1 | 13.41 | 2.49 | ||||
| 5. Peer attachment (Turkish) | -.17* | -.15* | .05 | .20** | 1 | 11.76 | 5.64 | |||
| 6. Ethnic identity Turkish | -.05 | -.14* | .15* | -.01 | .11 | 1 | 7.03 | 2.81 | ||
| 7. Ethnic identity Syrian | -.02 | .08 | .02 | .03 | -.06 | -.22** | 1 | 10.94 | 1.88 | |
| 8. Perceived discrimination | .27** | .27** | .10 | -.08 | -.14* | -.15* | .10 | 1 | 15.42 | 5.73 |
| Predictors | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional problem | .34** | .32** | .28** |
| Peer attachment (Syrian) | -.01 | .02 | |
| Peer attachment (Turkish) | -.12 | -.11 | |
| Social support from classmates | .11 | .09 | |
| Perceived discrimination | .18** | ||
| Ethnic identity (Syrian) | -.07 | ||
| Ethnic identity (Turkish) | .00 | ||
| ΔR2 | .11** | .03 | .03* |
| Total adjusted R2 | .11** | .12** | .15** |
| Predictors | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depression | .34** | .32** | .28** |
| Peer attachment (Syrian) | .09 | .10 | |
| Peer attachment (Turkish) | -.12 | -.09 | |
| Social support from classmates | -.04 | -.05 | |
| Perceived discrimination | .18** | ||
| Ethnic identity (Syrian) | .05 | ||
| Ethnic identity (Turkish) | -.07 | ||
| ΔR2 | .11** | .02 | .04** |
| Total Adjusted R2 | .11** | .12** | .15** |