Cyberbullying: relationship with developmental variables and cyber victimization▪
By:
References
- Williams KR, Guerra NG. Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. J Adolesc Health 2007;41(Suppl 6):S14-21.
- Olweus D. Bullying at school. In: Huesmann LR (Eds.) Aggressive behavior. The plenum series in social/clinical psychology. Boston, MA: Springer; 1994. pp. 97-130.
- Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N. Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psyc 2008;49(4):376-85.
- Baker ÖE, Tanrıkulu İ. Psychological consequences of cyber bullying experiences among Turkish secondary school children. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2010;2(2):2771-6.
- Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence Juv Justice 2006;4(2):148-69.
- Litwiller BJ, Brausch AM. Cyber bullying and physical bullying in adolescent suicide: the role of violent behavior and substance use. J Youth Adolesc 2013;42(5):675-84.
- Van Geel M, Vedder P, Tanilon J. Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2014;168(5):435-42.
- Arslan S, Savaser S, Hallett V, Balci S. Cyberbullying among primary school students in Turkey: Self-reported prevalence and associations with home and school life. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2012;15(10):527-33.
- Betts LR, Spenser KA, Gardner SE. Adolescents’ involvement in cyber bullying and perceptions of school: the importance of perceived peer acceptance for female adolescents. Sex Roles 2017;1-11.
- Gardella JH, Fisher BW, Teurbe-Tolon AR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cyber-victimization and educational outcomes for adolescents. Rev Educ Res 2017;87(2):283-308.
- Rivers I, Noret N. ‘I h8 u’: findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying. Br Educ Res J 2010;36(4): 643-71.
- Erikson EH. The problem of ego identity. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1956;4(1):56-121.
- Berzonsky MD. Identity processing style, self-construction, and personal epistemic assumptions: a social-cognitive perspective. Eur J Dev Psychol Psychology 2004;1(4):303-15.
- Marcia JE. Development and validation of ego-identity status. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996;3(5):551-8.
- Crocetti E, Rubini M, Meeus W. Capturing the dynamics of identity formation in various ethnic groups: development and validation of a three dimensional model. J Adolesc 2008;31(2):207-22.
- Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. J Adolesc Health 2011;48(2):121-7.
- Eleuteri S, Saladino V, Verrastro V. Identity, relationships, sexuality, and risky behaviors of adolescents in the context of social media. Sex Relation Ther 2017;32(3-4):354-65.
- Walrave M, Heirman W. Cyberbullying: predicting victimisation and perpetration. Child Soc 2011;25(1):59-72.
- Dumas TM, Ellis WE, Wolfe DA. Identity development as a buffer of adolescent risk behaviors in the context of peer group pressure and control. J Adolesc 2012;35(4):917-27.
- Jones RM, Hartmann BR. Ego identity: developmental differences and experimental substance use among adolescents. J Adolesc 1988;11(4):347-60.
- Morsünbül Ü. Ergenlikte kimlik statüleri ve risk alma arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between identity status and risk taking in adolescence]. İlköğretim Online 2013;12(2):347-55.
- Agnew R. Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology 1992;30(1):47-88.
- Ortega R, Elipe P, Mora-Merchán JA, Calmaestra J, Vega E. The emotional impact on victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying: a study of Spanish adolescents. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/J Psychology 2009;217(4):197-204.
- Jang H, Song J, Kim R. Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of general strain theory. Comput Hum Behav 2014;31:85-93.
- Lianos H, McGrath A. Can the general theory of crime and general strain theory explain cyberbullying perpetration? Crime Delinq 2018;64(5):675-700.
- Paez GR. Cyberbullying among adolescents: A general strain theory perspective. J Sch Violence 2018;17(1):74-85.
- Meeus W, Dekovic M. Identity development, parental and peer support in adolescence: Results of a national Dutch survey. Adolescence 1995;30(120):931-45.
- Fuligni AJ, Stevenson HW. Time use and mathematics achievement among American, Chinese, and Japanese high school students. Child Dev 1995;66(3):830-42.
- Hong JS, Espelage DL. A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggress Violent Behav 2012;17(4):311-22.
- Bingöl N, Tanrıkulu T. Siber zorba ve mağdur olma ile algılanan sosyal destek düzeyi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. [Investigating the relationship between perceived social support and cyber bullying and cyber victimization]. Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler E-Dergisi 2014;43:1-17.
- Burton KA, Florell D, Wygant DB. The role of peer attachment and normative beliefs about aggression on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Psychol Schools 2013;50(2):103-15.
- Cappadocia MC, Craig WM, Pepler D. Cyberbullying: prevalence, stability, and risk factors during adolescence. Can J School Psychol 2013;28(2):171-92.
- Mikami AY, Szwedo DE, Allen JP, Evans MA, Hare AL. Adolescent peer relationships and behavior problems predict young adults’ communication on social networking websites. Dev Psychol 2010;46(1):46-56.
- Katzer C, Fetchenhauer D, Belschak F. Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in internet chatrooms and victimization in school. J Media Psychol 2009;21(1):25-36.
- Thompson RA. Emotion regulation: a theme in search of definition. Monogr Soc Res Child 1994; 59(2-3), 25-52.
- Gross JJ. Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998;74(1):224-37.
- John OP, Gross JJ. Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. J Personality 2004;72(6):1301-34.
- Hofmann SG, Heering S, Sawyer AT, Asnaani A. How to handle anxiety: the effects of reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression strategies on anxious arousal. Behav Res Ther 2009;47(5):389-94.
- Larsen JK, Vermulst AA, Eisinga R, English T, Gross JJ, Hofman E, et al. Social coping by masking? Parental support and peer victimization as mediators of the relationship between depressive symptoms and expressive suppression in adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 2012;41(12):1628-42.
- Haga SM, Kraft P, Corby EK. Emotion regulation: antecedents and well-being outcomes of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression in cross-cultural samples. J Happiness Stud 2009;10(3):271-91.
- Terranova AM, Morris AS, Boxer P. Fear reactivity and effortful control in overt and relational bullying: a six-month longitudinal study. Aggress Behav 2008;34(1):104-15.
- Shields A, Cicchetti D. Parental maltreatment and emotion dysregulation as risk factors for bullying and victimization in middle childhood. J Clin Child Psychol 2001;30(3):349-363.
- Cicchetti D, Ackerman BP, Izard CE. Emotions and emotion regulation in developmental psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol 1995;7(1):1-10.
- Garner PW, Hinton TS. Emotional display rules and emotion self-regulation: Associations with bullying and victimization in community-based after school programs. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2010;20(6):480-96.
- Kokkinos CM, Voulgaridou I. Links between relational aggression, parenting and personality among adolescents. Eur J Dev Psychol 2017;14(3):249-64.
- Den Hamer AH, Konijn EA, Keijer MG. Cyberbullying behaviors and adolescents’ use of media with antisocial content: a cyclic process model. Paper presented at the International Communication Association (ICA) annual conference to be held in London, June 17-21, 2013.
- Kelly BM, Schwartz D, Gorman AH, Nakamoto J. Violent victimization in the community and children’s subsequent peer rejection: the mediating role of emotion dysregulation. J Abnorm Chıld Psych 2008;36(2):175-85.
- Anderson CA, Buckley KE, Carnagey NL. Creating your own hostile environment: a laboratory examination of trait aggressiveness and the violence escalation cycle. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2008;34(4):462-73.
- Bushman, BJ, Anderson CA. Violent video games and hostile expectations: a test of the general aggression model. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2002;28(12):1679-86.
- Kowalski RM, Giumetti GW, Schroeder AN, Lattanner MR. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol Bull 2014;140(4):1073-137.
- Barlett CP, Gentile DA. Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychol Pop Media Cult 2012;1(2):123-35.
- Accordino DB, Accordino MP. An exploratory study of face-to-face and cyberbullying in sixth grade students. American Secondary Education 2011;40(1):14-30.
- Akbulut Y, Eristi B. Cyberbullying and victimisation among Turkish university students. Australas J Educ Tec 2011;27(7):1155-70.
- Ang RP, Goh D. Cyberbullying among adolescents: the role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2010;41(4):387-97.
- Bauman S. Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: an exploratory study. J Early Adolesc 2010;30(6):803-33.
- Bauman S. Cyberbullying: What does research tell us? Theory Pract 2013;52(4):249-56.
- Del Rey R, Elipe P, Ortega-Ruiz R. Bullying and cyberbullying: overlapping and predictive value of the co-occurrence. Psicothema 2012;24(4):608-13.
- Campbell MA. Cyber bullying: an old problem in a new guise? J Couns Psychol Sch 2005;15(1):68-76.
- Juvonen J, Gross EF. Extending the school grounds? – Bullying experiences in cyberspace. J Sch Health 2008;78(9):496-505.
- Calvete E, Orue I, Estévez A, Villardón L, Padilla P. Cyberbullying in adolescents: modalities and aggressors’ profile. Comput Hum Behav 2010;26(5):1128-35.
- Li Q. Bullying in the new playground: research into cyberbullying and cyber victimization. Australas J Educ Tec 2007;23(4):435-54.
- Aboujaoude E, Savage MW, Starcevic V, Salame WO. Cyberbullying: review of an old problem gone viral. J Adolesc Health 2015;57(1):10-18.
- Sticca F, Ruggieri S, Alsaker F, Perren S. Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. J Community Appl Soc 2013;23(1):52-67.
- Fanti KA, Demetriou AG, Hawa VV. A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: examining risk and protective factors. Eur J Dev Psychol 2012;9(2):168-81.
- Selig JP, Little TD. Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In: Laursen B, Little TD, Card NA (Eds.). Handbook of developmental research methods. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2012. pp. 265-278.
- Tyagi TK, Singh B. The application of cross-lagged panel analysis in educational research. Facta Universitatis, Series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History 2014;2(14):39-51.
- Kearney MW. Cross lagged panel analysis. In: Allen M (Eds.). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2017.
- Voelkle MC, Oud JH, Davidov E, Schmidt P. A SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychol Methods 2012;17(2):176-92.
- Erdur-Baker Ö, Kavşut F. The new face of peer bullying: cyberbullying. Eurasian J Educ Res 2007;27(27):31-42.
- Topcu Ç, Erdur-Baker Ö. RCBI-II: The second revision of the revised cyber bullying inventory. Meas Eval Couns Dev 2018;51(1):32-41.
- Morsünbül U, Crocetti E, Cok F, Meeus W. Brief report: The Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS): gender and age measurement invariance and convergent validity of the Turkish version. J Adolesc 2014;37(6):799-805.
- Bukowski WM, Hoza B, Boivin M. Measuring friendship quality during pre-and early adolescence: the development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. J Soc Pers Relat 1994;11(3):471-84.
- Atik ZE, Çoban AE, Çok F, Doğan T, Karaman NG. The Turkish adaptation of the friendship qualities scale: a validity and reliability study. Educ Sci Theory Pract 2014;14(2):433-46.
- Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;85(2):348-62.
- Özgüle ETU. Mediating role of self-regulation between parenting. Attachment, and adjustment in middle adolescence, [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Middle East Technical University, Ankara; 2011.
- Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 1988;103(3):411-23.
- Jöreskog KG, Olsson UH, Wallentin FY. Multivariate analysis with lisrel. Basel: Springer; 2016.
- Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance + structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999;6(1):1-55.
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate analysis. New York, NY: Harper Collins; 2001.
- Hoff DL, Mitchell SN. Cyberbullying: causes, effects, and remedies. J Educ Admin 2001;47(5):652-65.
- Janssens A, Van Den Noortgate W, Goossens L, Verschueren K, Colpin H, De Laet S, et al. Externalizing problem behavior in adolescence: Dopaminergic genes in interaction with peer acceptance and rejection. J Youth Adolesc 2015;44(7):1441-56.
- Butler EA, Egloff B, Wilhelm FH, Smith NC, Erickson EA, Gross JJ. The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion 2003;3(1):48-67.
- Crocetti E, Klimstra TA, Hale WW, Koot HM, Meeus W. Impact of early adolescent externalizing problem behaviors on identity development in middle to late adolescence: a prospective 7-year longitudinal study. J Youth Adolesc 2013;42(11):1745-58.
- Crocetti E, Rubini M, Luyckx K, Meeus W. Identity formation in early and middle adolescents from various ethnic groups: from three dimensions to five statuses. J Youth Adolesc 2008;37(8):983-96.
- Çetin AB, Ceyhan AA. Ergenlerin İnternet’te kimlik denemeleri ve problemli İnternet kullanım davranışları [Adolescents’ online identity trials and problematic internet usage]. The Turkish J Addict 2014;1(2):5-46.
- Menesini E. Cyberbullying: The right value of the phenomenon. Comments on the paper “Cyberbullying: an overrated phenomenon?”. Eur J Dev Psychol 2012;9(5):544-52.
- Subrahmanyam K, Šmahel D. Constructing identity online: Identity exploration and self-presentation. In: Subrahmanyam K, Šmahel D (Eds.). Digital youth. The role of media in development. New York, NY: Springer; 2011. pp. 59-80
- Monago A. Identity development in the digital age: The case of social networking sites. In: McLean KC, Syed M (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of identity development. New York, NY: Oxford Library of Psychology; 2015. pp. 508-524.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2020-004 | Journal eISSN: 2245-8875
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 37
Published on: Mar 18, 2020
Published by: Psychiatric Research Unit
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Gülendam Akgül, Müge Artar, published by Psychiatric Research Unit
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.