Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cyberbullying: relationship with developmental variables and cyber victimization▪ Cover

Cyberbullying: relationship with developmental variables and cyber victimization▪

By:  and    
Open Access
|Mar 2020
Read online

Figures & Tables

FIGURE 1.

Proposed Cross-Sectional Model about the Relationship between Dimensions of Identity Development, Peer Relations, Emotion Regulation Strategies and Cyberbullying

TABLE 1.

The descriptive statistics and correlations between variables

1234567
1. Cyberbullying
2. Cyber victimization0.58**
3. Peer relations0.10**−0.11**
4. Expressive repression−0.06*0.030.02
5. Commitment−0.03−0.03−0.54**−0.02
6. In-depth exploration0.06**0.07*0.34**−0.09**0.43**
7. Reconsideration of commitment0.000.01−0.16**0.13**−0.13**0.26**
Sample mean12.6613.263.6314.883.793.112.27
Standard deviation3.563.990.584.840.960.851.05

1 Notes. N = 1,151. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01

FIGURE 2.

Standardized Coefficient of Cross-Sectional Model of Cyberbullying (p > 0.05)

TABLE 2.

The descriptive statistics and correlations between variables

Cyberbullying T1Cyber victimization T1Cyberbullying T2Cyber victimization T2
Cyberbullying T11
Cyber victimization T10.58**1
Cyberbullying T20.56**0.42**1
Cyber victimization T20.41**0.55**0.64**1
M12.6613.2612.4913.24
SD3.563.993.723.84

1 Notes. N = 322. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

TABLE 3.

The hierarchic regression analysis results

Predicted variablesPredictor variablesBSErβ
CV (T2)
Model 1Constant5.580.69
CV(T1)0.570.050.52**
Model 2Constant5.410.87
CV (T1)0.550.060.51**
CB (T1)0.020.080.02
Note: For Model 1 R2 = 0.27 (p < 0.001); for Model 2 ΔR2 = 0.00 (p > 0.001)
CB (T2)
Model 1Constant6.000.64
CB (T1)0.510.050.48**
Model 2Constant5.110.66
CB(T1)0.370.060.35**
CV (T1)0.200.050.24**
Note: For Model 1 R2 = 0.23 (p < 0.001); for Model 2 ΔR2 = 0.04 (p < 0.001)

1 Notes. N = 322. **p < 0.00 CV (T1): Cyber victimization at Time 1; CV (T2): Cyber victimization at Time 2; CB (T1): Cyberbullying at Time 1; CB (T2): Cyberbullying at Time 2

FIGURE 3.

The cross-lagged panel model of cyber victimization and cyberbullying with four months interval.

Non-significant paths are dotted. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Language: English
Page range: 25 - 37
Published online: Mar 18, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Published by: Center for Evidence-based Psychiatry
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Gülendam Akgül, Müge Artar, published by Center for Evidence-based Psychiatry
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.