Reply to “Comment on Geodesic Cycle Length Distributions in Delusional and Other Social Networks”

Stivala, Alex

doi:10.21307/joss-2020-004

Abstract

Martin (2020) describes a misinterpretation of exponential random graph (ERGM) parameters in my contribution (Stivala 2020), with the use of this parametric model obscuring, rather than illuminating, the data. He suggests that this is symptomatic of a trend in the social networks community towards a methodological monoculture focussed on the use of ERGMs. In this Reply I try to clarify how this situation arose in this specific case, and address some more general issues Martin raises, including the use of nodal covariates, what we can learn from ERGMs, and methodological monoculturalism in social network research.

References

Abbott, A. 1988. “Transcending General Linear Reality”. Sociological Theory 6(2):169-86.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barabási, A.L., and R. Albert 1999. “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks”. Science 286(5439):509-12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bearman, P.S., J. Moody, and K. Stovel. 2004. “Chains of Affection: The Structure of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Networks”. American Journal of Sociology 110(1):44-91.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Block, P., J. Hollway, C. Stadtfeld, J. Koskinen, and T.A.B. Snijders. 2019. ““Predicting” after Peeking into the Future: Correcting a Fundamental Flaw in the SAOM – TERGM Comparison of Leifeld and Cranmer (2019)”. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.01385v1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Block, P., J. Koskinen, J. Hollway, C. Steglich, and C. Stadtfeld. 2018. “Change We Can Believe in: Comparing Longitudinal Network Models on Consistency, Interpretability and Predictive Power”. Social Networks 52:180-91.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Block, P., C. Stadtfeld, and T.A.B. Snijders. 2019. “Forms of Dependence: Comparing SAOMs and ERGMs from Basic Principles”. Sociological Methods & Research 48(1):202-39.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Broido, A.D., and A. Clauset. 2019. “Scale-Free Networks are Rare”. Nature Communications 10(1):1017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Butts, C.T. 2017. “Comment: Actor Orientation and Relational Event Models”. Sociological Methodology 47(1):47-56.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Colomer-de-Simón, P., and M. Boguñá. 2014. “Double Percolation Phase Transition in Clustered Complex Networks”. Physical Review X 4(4):041020.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Colomer-de-Simón, P., M.A. Serrano, M.G. Beiró, J.I. Alvarez-Hamelin, and M. Boguñá. 2013. “Deciphering the Global Organization of Clustering in Real Complex Networks”. Scientific Reports 3(1):2517.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fritz, C., M. Lebacher, and G. Kauermann. 2020. “Tempus Volat, Hora Fugit: A Survey of Tie-oriented Dynamic Network Models in Discrete and Continuous Time”. Statistica Neerlandica 74(3):275-99.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gondal, N., and P.D. McLean. 2013. “What Makes a Network Go Round? Exploring the Structure of a Strong Component with Exponential Random Graph Models”. Social Networks 35(4):499-513.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Handcock, M.S., and J.H. Jones. 2004. “Likelihood-based Inference for Stochastic Models of Sexual Network Formation”. Theoretical Population Biology 65(4):413-22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hummel, R.M., D.R. Hunter, and M.S. Handcock. 2012. “Improving Simulation-based Algorithms for Fitting ERGMs”. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 21(4):920-39.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hunter, D.R. 2007. “Curved Exponential Family Models for Social Networks”. Social Networks 29(2):216-30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leifeld, P., and S.J. Cranmer. 2019. “A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of the Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model and the Stochastic Actor-oriented Model”. Network Science 7(1):20-51.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Levy, M.A. 2016. “gwdegree: Improving Interpretation of Geometrically-Weighted Degree Estimates in Exponential Random Graph Models”. Journal of Open Source Software 1(3):36.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lusher, D., and G. Robins. 2013. “Formation of Social Network Structure”. In Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks, edited by D. Lusher, J. Koskinen and G. Robins, 16-28. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mahadevan, P., D. Krioukov, K. Fall, and A. Vahdat. 2006. “Systematic Topology Analysis and Generation Using Degree Correlations”. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 36(4):135-46.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martin, J. L. 2017. “The Structure of Node and Edge Generation in a Delusional Social Network”. Journal of Social Structure 18(1):1-21.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Orsini, C., M.M. Dankulov, P. Colomer-de-Simón, A. Jamakovic, P. Mahadevan, A. Vahdat, … and S. Fortunato. 2015. “Quantifying Randomness in Real Networks”. Nature Communications 6(1):8627.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pattison, P., and T.A.B. Snijders. 2013. “Modeling Social Networks: Next Steps”. In Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks, edited by D. Lusher, J. Koskinen and G. Robins, 287-301. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robins, G., and G. Daraganova. 2013. “Social Selection, Dyadic Covariates, and Geospatial Effects”. In Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks, edited by D. Lusher, J. Koskinen and G. Robins, 91-101. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robins, G., P. Elliott, and P. Pattison. 2001. “Network Models for Social Selection Processes”. Social Networks, 23(1):1-30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rolls, D.A., P. Wang, E. McBryde, P. Pattison, and G. Robins. 2015. “A Simulation Study Comparing Epidemic Dynamics on Exponential Random Graph and Edge-Triangle Configuration Type Contact Network Models”. PLoS ONE 10(11):e0142181.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Snijders, T.A.B. 2017. “Comment: Modeling of Coordination, Rate Functions, and Missing Ordering Information”. Sociological Methodology 47(1):41-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Snijders, T.A.B., P.E. Pattison, G.L. Robins, and M.S. Handcock. 2006. “New Specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models”. Sociological Methodology 36(1):99-153.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stadtfeld, C., and P. Block. 2017. “Interactions, Actors, and Time: Dynamic Network Actor Models for Relational Events”. Sociological Science 4:318-52.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stadtfeld, C., J. Hollway, and P. Block. 2017a. “Dynamic Network Actor Models: Investigating Coordination Ties Through Time”. Sociological Methodology 47(1):1-40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stadtfeld, C., J. Hollway, and P. Block. 2017b. “Rejoinder: DyNAMs and the Grounds for Actor-Oriented Network Event Models”. Sociological Methodology 47(1):56-67.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stumpf, M.P., and M.A. Porter. 2012. “Critical Truths about Power Laws”. Science, 335(6069):665-6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Reply to “Comment on Geodesic Cycle Length Distributions in Delusional and Other Social Networks”

Abstract

Paradigm

My account