Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Transitivity Types Predict Communicative Abilities in Infants at Risk of Autism* Cover

Transitivity Types Predict Communicative Abilities in Infants at Risk of Autism*

Open Access
|Aug 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Interactions are sorted into one of 15 triads (003 is not an interaction). Letters correspond to shape characteristics: D=down, U=up, C=cyclical, T=transitive. Numbers correspond with link characteristics: First digit=number of reciprocal links, second digit=number of unidirectional links, third digit=number of null links.

Figure 2:

Triadic representation of joint attention. The Caregiver is linking to both Infant and Object, while the Infant is linking to Object. Traditionally, this instance would be referred to as a moment of joint attention because both caregiver and infant are attending to the same third entity. In triadic analysis, this interaction is a transitive (TraT) 030T triad.

Table 1.

Demographic information for families

Demographic informationFamilies (n=37)
Sex
Male (%)19 (51)
Female (%)18 (49)
Racial or ethnic minority (%)4 (11)
Multiplex family (%)3 (8)
Mean age for mothers (SD)33.95 (3.93)
Mean age for fathers (SD)36.73 (5.15)
Maternal education
Graduate or professional school (%)15 (41)
Some college or college degree (%)17 (46)
High school (%)5 (13)
Paternal education
Graduate or professional school (%)10 (27)
Some college or college degree (%)21 (57)
High school (%)6 (16)
Mean paternal occupational prestige (SD)55.84 (16.25)
Table 2:

Six examples in which the same initial action lead to either a VacT, ntT, or TraT triad

ExampleVacTIntTTraT
A Behavior1. Caregiver calls Infant’s name1. Caregiver calls Infant’s name
2. Infant touches Object
1. Caregiver calls Infant’s name
2. Infant touches Object
3. Caregiver plays with Object
Triadgraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_001.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_002.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_003.jpg
B Behavior1. Infant shakes Object1. Infant shakes an Object
2. Object rattles in earshot of Infant and Caregiver
1. Infant shakes Object
2. Object rattles in earshot of Infant and Caregiver
3. Caregiver talks to Infant about Object
Triadgraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_004.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_005.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_006.jpg
C Behavior1. Caregiver shows Object to Infant1. Caregiver shows Object to Infant
2. Infant looks at Caregiver
1. Caregiver shows Object to Infant
2. Infant looks at Object
Triadgraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_007.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_008.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_009.jpg
D Behavior1. Caregiver shows Object to Infant1. Caregiver shows Object to Infant
2. Infant looks at Caregiver
1. Caregiver shows Object to Infant
2. Infant looks at Caregiver and Object
Triadgraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_010.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_011.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_012.jpg
E Behavior1. Infant looks at Caregiver1. Infant looks at Caregiver
2. Caregiver speaks to Infant about Object
1. Infant looks at Caregiver
2. Caregiver speaks to Infant about Object
3. Infant looks at Object
Triadgraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_013.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_014.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_015.jpg
F Behavior1. Infant and Caregiver both touch Object1. Infant and Caregiver touch Object
2. Object lights up for Infant and Caregiver
1. Infant and Caregiver touch Object
2. Object lights up for Infant and Caregiver
3. Caregiver and Infant look at each other
Triadgraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_016.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_017.jpggraphic/j_joss-2019-009_ingr_018.jpg
Figure 3:

Transitivity type proportions across months for males and females. The x-axis represents months 5 through 14, and the y-axis represents the proportions each transitivity type constitutes. Male and female proportions are displayed side by side for better comparison across months.

Table 3:

Transitivity types and outcome measures

Transitivity Types and Outcome MeasuresMales (n=19)Females (n=18)
Transitivity
VacT average proportion mean (SD)0.60 (0.04)0.60 (0.03)
IntT average proportion mean (SD)0.11 (0.01)0.12 (0.02)
TraT average proportion mean (SD)0.27 (0.03)0.27 (0.03)
CDI
CDI-III raw word count (SD)51.21 (27.97)53.17 (24.51)
CDI-III complexity number (SD)5 (3.83)7.06 (4.09)
CDI-III complexity percentile (SD)14.47 (18.48)27.06 (34.41)
CDI-III using language number (SD)6.89 (3.60)6.94 (2.94)
CDI-III using language percentile (SD)28.68 (28.81)17.17 (25.32)
CDI-III longest sentence mean (SD)6.93 (3.00)7.48 (1.96)
MSEL
Visual Reception (SD)52 (15.99)57.53 (13.61)
Fine Motor (SD)43.89 (16.31)44.78 (15.69)
Receptive Language (SD)48.72 (12.41)47.44 (13.26)
Expressive Language (SD)53.72 (10.17)52.23 (12.84)
ADOS2.47 (1.81)2 (1.75)
Diagnostic outcome information
ASD (%)2 (11)2 (11)
Language delayed (%)9 (47)6 (33)
No symptoms (%)8 (42)10 (56)
Table 4:

Significant correlations between transitivity types and outcome measures for males and females

Significant correlationsMales (n=19)Females (n=18)
TraT and CDI-III raw word countcor=0.53, p=0.03
IntT and CDI-III raw word countcor=-0.51, p=0.04
IntT and CDI-III number of complex language usedcor=-0.62, p=0.03
IntT and CDI-III number of times language usedcor=-0.55, p=0.03
IntT and CDI-III longest sentence meanscor=-0.55, p=0.03
IntT and MSEL standard scorecor=-0.56, p=0.03
IntT and MSEL fine motor scorecor=-0.55, p=0.03
IntT and MSEL receptive language scorecor=-0.55, p=0.02
IntT and MSEL cognitive sumcor=-0.53, p=0.03
Male Dataset MonthsMean Link RateSDLink SumMean Triad RateSDTriad SumVacT ProportionIntT ProportionTraT Proportion
556.817.83175924.193.3174860.67%9.77%29.56%
659.6014.951696.7925.364.70722.8961.79%10.38%27.82%
758.5714.401990.3726.525.18899.2665.28%10.89%23.83%
861.7713.282021.3727.764.52916.8963.98%12.00%24.02%
965.178.252150.5828.962.81954.5963.21%11.02%25.77%
1068.3011.442236.6830.065.20997.4262.12%11.88%25.99%
1169.3012.052336.2129.534.521002.4759.67%12.25%28.08%
1273.5514.402573.2431.264.531097.1356.99%12.44%30.57%
1372.9311.052766.4230.754.171163.7955.54%12.14%32.32%
1467.8915.072632.4229.346.111134.3758.21%12.51%29.28%
Female Dataset MonthsMean Link RateSDLink SumMean Triad RateSDTriad SumVacT ProportionIntT ProportionTraT Proportion
561.9215.811759.4726.285.12756.0061.49%10.85%27.66%
660.6912.181863.7226.695.44826.6762.41%11.35%26.24%
757.7314.401824.2825.705.16819.8363.81%12.27%23.92%
857.0410.771740.8225.184.00775.5963.58%11.98%24.44%
965.5710.341990.9429.054.22881.5362.54%12.49%24.97%
1064.3110.941787.4427.963.95784.7861.22%12.59%26.19%
1169.1814.972201.8329.535.41936.7259.50%14.18%26.32%
1269.0714.492496.6129.486.011062.6757.04%12.22%30.74%
1369.5614.752690.1729.725.791151.5057.54%11.66%30.80%
1466.9112.292458.8928.575.191048.7256.53%13.23%30.25%
Language: English
Page range: 119 - 139
Published on: Aug 1, 2019
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Rebekka Schleier, Jana M. Iverson, Andrew P. King, Meredith J. West, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.