Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Social Influence and Network Churn in Beliefs about Electronic Medical Record Technology Cover

The Role of Social Influence and Network Churn in Beliefs about Electronic Medical Record Technology

Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. Agarwal, R. (2000). Individual acceptance of information technologies. In R. W. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the domains of IT management: Projecting the future through the past (pp. 85-104). Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex.
  2. Aydin, C. E., & Rice, R. E. (1991). Social worlds, individual differences, and implementation: Predicting attitudes toward a medical information system. Information & Management, 20(2), 119-136.
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  4. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative science quarterly, 31(1), 78-108.
  5. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis.
  6. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of management, 29(6), 991-1013.
  7. Buntin, M. B., Burke, M. F., Hoaglin, M. C., & Blumenthal, D. (2011). The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs, 30(3), 464-471.
  8. Burger, M. J., & Buskens, V. (2009). Social context and network formation: An experimental study. Social networks, 31(1), 63-75.
  9. Burk, W. J., Steglich, C. E., & Snijders, T. A. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International journal of behavioral development, 31(4), 397-404.
  10. Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 104-127.
  11. Burt, R. S. (2000). Decay functions. Social networks, 22(1), 1-28.
  12. Butts, C. (1998). A Bayesian model of panic in belief. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 4(4), 373-404.
  13. Cannella, A. A., & McFadyen, M. A. (2013). Changing the exchange the dynamics of knowledge worker ego networks. Journal of management, 0149206313511114.
  14. Carayon, P., Cartmill, R., Blosky, M. A., Brown, R., Hackenberg, M., Hoonakker, P., … Walker, J. M. (2011). ICU nurses’ acceptance of electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(6), 812-819.
  15. Contractor, N. S., Seibold, D. R., & Heller, M. A. (1996). Interactional influence in the structuring of media use in groups: Influence in members’ perceptions of group decision support system use. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 451-481.
  16. Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. P. (2001). Knowing what we know:: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational dynamics, 30(2), 100-120.
  17. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International journal of man-machine studies, 38(3), 475-487.
  18. Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183-196.
  19. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
  20. Heeks, R. (2006). Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75(2), 125-137.
  21. Hersh, W. (2004). Health care information technology: progress and barriers. Jama, 292(18), 2273-2274.
  22. Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative science quarterly, 38(2), 277-303.
  23. Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427-436.
  24. Kelman, H. C. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 1-26.
  25. Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689-713.
  26. Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of management review, 21(4), 1055-1080.
  27. Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science, 311(5757), 88-90.
  28. Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American journal of Sociology, 115(2), 405-450.
  29. Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216-239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  30. Kristman, V., Manno, M., & Côté, P. (2004). Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? European journal of epidemiology, 19(8), 751-760.
  31. Lee, T.-T., Mills, M. E., Bausell, B., & Lu, M.-H. (2008). Two-stage evaluation of the impact of a nursing information system in Taiwan. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(10), 698-707.
  32. Leenders, R. T. A. (1996). Evolution of friendship and best friendship choices. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21(1-2), 133-148.
  33. Leonardi, P. M. (2013). When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 749-775.
  34. Locock, L., Dopson, S., Chambers, D., & Gabbay, J. (2001). Understanding the role of opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness. Social science & medicine, 53(6), 745-757.
  35. Marsden, P. V. (2005). Recent developments in network measurement. In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 8-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(1), 127-151.
  37. Mascia, D., & Cicchetti, A. (2011). Physician social capital and the reported adoption of evidence-based medicine: Exploring the role of structural holes. Social Science & Medicine, 72(5), 798-805.
  38. Massaro, T. A. (1993). Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 20-25.
  39. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 27, 415-444.
  40. Moody, J. (1999). The structure of adolescent social relations: modeling friendship in dynamic social settings. (Ph.D. Dissertation), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
  41. Nanda, R., & Sørensen, J. B. (2010). Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(7), 1116-1126.
  42. Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  43. Rice, R. E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative science quarterly, 36(2), 219-244.
  44. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
  45. Saint-Charles, J., & Mongeau, P. (2009). Different relationships for coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in organizations. Social networks, 31(1), 33-39.
  46. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative science quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
  47. Sasovova, Z., Mehra, A., Borgatti, S. P., & Schippers, M. C. (2010). Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Administrative science quarterly, 55(4), 639-670.
  48. Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail a test of the social influence model of technology use. Communication research, 18(4), 487-523.
  49. Smith, K., Smith, V., Krugman, M., & Oman, K. (2005). Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. Computers Informatics Nursing, 23(3), 132-138.
  50. Snijders, T., Steglich, C., & Schweinberger, M. (2006). Modeling the coevolution of networks and behavior. In K. van Montfort, J. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences (pp. 41-72). London: Routledge Academic.
  51. Srivastava, S. B. (2015). Intraorganizational network dynamics in times of ambiguity. Organization Science, 26(5), 1365-1380.
  52. Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological methodology, 40(1), 329-393.
  53. Sykes, T. A., Venkatesh, V., & Rai, A. (2011). Explaining physicians’ use of EMR systems and performance in the shakedown phase. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(2), 125-130.
  54. Valente, T. W. (2012). Network interventions. Science, 337(6090), 49-53.
  55. Van de Bunt, G. G., Van Duijn, M. A., & Snijders, T. A. (1999). Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented dynamic statistical network model. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 5(2), 167-192.
  56. Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260.
  57. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  58. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  59. Venkatesh, V., Zhang, X., & Sykes, T. A. (2011). “Doctors do too little technology”: A longitudinal field study of an electronic healthcare system implementation. Information Systems Research, 22(3), 523-546.
  60. Vissa, B. (2011). A matching theory of entrepreneurs’ tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 137-158.
  61. Vissa, B., & Bhagavatula, S. (2012). The causes and consequences of churn in entrepreneurs’ personal networks. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 273-289.
  62. Vogelsmeier, A. A., Halbesleben, J. R., & Scott-Cawiezell, J. R. (2008). Technology implementation and workarounds in the nursing home. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(1), 114-119.
  63. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  64. Wears, R. L., & Berg, M. (2005). Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. Jama, 293(10), 1261-1263.
  65. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  66. White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1-25.
  67. Wooldridge, J. (2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/joss-2019-005 | Journal eISSN: 1529-1227 | Journal ISSN: 2300-0422
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 49
Published on: Aug 1, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Christina T. Yuan, Gerald C. Kane, Jason M. Fletcher, Ingrid M. Nembhard, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.