Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Dynamics of Social Networks Following Adolescent Pregnancy Cover

Dynamics of Social Networks Following Adolescent Pregnancy

Open Access
|Oct 2018

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

School 1 (public, rural) network maps at Time 1 (left) & Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.
School 1 (public, rural) network maps at Time 1 (left) & Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.

Figure 2.

School 2 (public, rural) network maps at Time 1 (left) and Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.
School 2 (public, rural) network maps at Time 1 (left) and Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.

Figure 3a.

School 3 (public, suburban) Time 1 map. Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant.
School 3 (public, suburban) Time 1 map. Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant.

Figure 3b.

School 3 (public, suburban) Time 3 map. Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant.
School 3 (public, suburban) Time 3 map. Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant.

Figure 4.

School 4 (public, rural) network maps at Time 1 (left) and Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.
School 4 (public, rural) network maps at Time 1 (left) and Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.

Figure 5.

School 5 (private, urban) network maps at Time 1 (left) and Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.
School 5 (private, urban) network maps at Time 1 (left) and Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.

Figure 6.

School 6 (public, suburban) network maps at Time 1 (left) & Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.
School 6 (public, suburban) network maps at Time 1 (left) & Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.

Figure 7.

School 7 (Catholic, urban) network maps at Time 1 (left) and Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.
School 7 (Catholic, urban) network maps at Time 1 (left) and Time 3 (right). Blue = pregnant, orange = non-pregnant match.

Stochastic Actor Oriented Model Estimates for Schools 2 and 3

 School 2School 3
Rate (Period 1)11.379.30
(0.55)(0.87)
Rate (Period 2)10.315.00
(0.47)(0.31)
Out degree-3.32-4.16
(0.03)(0.04)
Reciprocity2.162.60
(0.05)(0.08)
Transitive Triplets0.440.61
(0.02)(0.03)
Female Similarity0.180.35
(0.03)(0.04)
Grade Similarity2.012.11
(0.11)(0.13)
Pregnant alter-0.340.09
(1.42)(0.24)
Pregnant ego-0.77-0.35
(1.37)(0.30)
Pregnant similarity-0.360.33
(1.41)(0.24)
n nodes (preg. nodes)479 (21)850 (60)

Separable Temporal Exponential Random Graph Models of Schools 2 and 3

 School 2School 3
FormationDissolutionFormationDissolution
BaseCovars.BaseCovars.BaseCovars.BaseCovars.
Edges-6.40*-6.52*-6.56-1.47*-6.92*-7.52*-0.76*-1.65*
(0.03)(0.04)(0.03)(0.06)(0.03)(0.05)(0.04)(0.08)
Preg - Out-0.70*-0.37-0.85-0.77-0.61*-0.51*-0.51-0.31
(0.03)(0.31)(0.45)(0.52)(0.18)(0.19)(0.28)(0.30)
Preg - In-0.260.15-0.66-0.30-0.27-0.12-0.79*0.47
(0.24)(0.21)(0.38)-(0.45)(0.16)(0.16)(0.30)(0.05)
Triad (gwesp) 1.16* 0.37* 1.38* 0.47*
(0.03) (0.04) (0.05) (0.05)
Reciprocity 3.18* 1.75* 3.68* 1.38*
(0.90) (0.11) (0.11) (0.14)
Gender Homophily 0.11* 0.64* 0.34* 0.68*
(0.05) (0.07) (0.06) (0.09)

Random Intercept Models of Change in Network Variables between Time 1 and Time 3 Surveys

 Out-nom.In-nomRecip. FriendsCentrality
Intercept-2.54*-2.55*-0.93*-0.14
(0.34)(0.63)(0.26)(0.23)
Pregnant-0.77-1.01*-0.28-0.01
(0.47)(0.42)(0.24)(0.02)
Random Intercept0.201.930.240.35
Student-level residual10.067.82.500.01
n240240240240
School n7777

Comparison of Pregnant Girls to Non-Pregnant Matched Girls and Not Matched Non-Pregnant Girls Using Mean Difference Testing and Standardized Biases_

 PregnantMatched Non-PregNot Matched Non-Preg
MSDMSDStd biasMSDStd bias
Out-Nominations
Num. at first survey5.123.445.183.21-0.025.493.22-0.11
Avg. diff. bt surveys-3.153.29-2.383.16-0.23-2.01*3.47-0.35
Num. maintained bt surveys0.650.901.03*1.32-0.421.41*1.47-0.85
In-Nominations
Num. at first survey4.483.394.293.620.064.783.66-0.09
Avg. diff. bt surveys-3.123.02-2.11*2.86-0.33-2.28*3.18-0.28
Num. maintained bt surveys0.300.590.58*0.92-0.470.87*1.12-0.97
Reciprocated Friends
Num. at first survey1.601.531.741.70-0.091.981.74-0.25
Avg. diff. bt surveys-1.121.56-0.831.64-0.18-0.881.72-0.15
Centrality
Num. at first survey0.570.470.580.47-0.010.550.460.05
Avg. diff. bt surveys-0.270.87-0.240.86-0.04-0.230.83-0.05
Covariates
Age15.571.0915.491.110.0715.02*1.360.50
White0.470.500.440.500.060.440.500.05
Black0.220.420.230.42-0.030.160.370.13
Hispanic0.521.470.661.65-0.090.912.19-0.27
U.S. Born0.950.220.920.280.150.84*0.370.50
Prior GPA2.310.732.390.68-0.103.07*0.69-1.04
HIV/AIDS Expectations1.001.351.212.03-0.150.851.570.11
Number in Household4.551.334.561.130.004.741.12-0.14
Extracurricular0.330.480.320.470.040.14*0.340.41
Get Along w. Teacher1.221.301.111.300.091.061.340.12
Get Along w. Peers1.581.451.561.490.021.431.540.10
Try in School1.780.611.760.660.051.58*0.590.34
Tried Alcohol0.780.420.790.41-0.030.44*0.500.82
Overall Health2.730.882.810.90-0.082.14*0.940.67
Cigarette Consumption2.532.802.272.530.090.65*1.430.67
Lie to Parents2.831.862.861.84-0.012.00*1.680.45
Skip School1.571.691.441.680.080.35*0.770.72
n60 180 572

Average Network Degrees and Network Densities at Time 1 and Time 3 by School

SchoolnAvg. DegreeNetwork Density
Time 1Time 3Time 1Time 3
11213.782.310.0310.019
24793.882.730.0080.006
38502.081.260.0020.001
4702.612.730.0380.04
5762.261.840.030.25
6922.881.550.0510.027
7464.021.570.0980.038

Characteristics of Saturated Schools with One or More Pregnancy Occurrence

SchoolTypeUrbanicitySizeGradeRegion
1PublicRuralSmallK-12South
2PublicRuralLarge9-12Midwest
3PublicSuburbanLarge10-12West
4PublicRuralSmallK-12Midwest
5PrivateUrbanSmallK-12South
6PublicSuburbanSmall6-8South
7CatholicUrbanSmallK-8Northeast

Random Intercept Models of Number of Friendships Maintained between Time 1 and Time 3 Surveys

 Out-nom.In-nom
Intercept1.08*0.7*
(0.19)(0.13)
Pregnant-0.37*-0.28*
(0.18)(0.13)
Random Intercept0.120.06
Student-level residual1.410.68
n240240
School n77

Comparison of School Characteristics in Saturated Sample, Saturated Sample with Girls Experiencing a Pregnancy and Non-Saturated Sample Schools

 Saturated (w/girls)Saturated (w/preg.)Non-Saturated
Urbanicity
Urban4 (26.7%)2 (28.6%)33 (30.0%)
Suburban6 (40.0%)2 (28.6%)63 (57.3%)
Rural5 (33.3%)3 (42.9%)14 (12.7%)
Region
West3 (20.0%)1 (14.3%)22 (20.0%)
Midwest5 (33.3%)2 (28.6%)22 (20.0%)
South4 (26.7%)3 (42.9%)49 (44.5%)
Northeast3 (20.0%)1 (14.3%)17 (15.5%)
School Size*
Small (1-400)13 (86.7%)5 (71.4%)16 (14.5%)
Medium (401-1000)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)59 (53.6%)
Large (1001-4000)2 (13.3%)2 (28.6%)35 (31.8%)
School Type*
Public10 (66.7%)5 (71.4%)104 (94.5%)
Private4 (26.7%)1 (14.3%)2 (1.8%)
Catholic1 (6.7%)1 (14.3%)4 (3.6%)
Grades*
Includes primary grades11 (73.3%)4 (57.1%)4 (3.6%)
No primary grades4 (26.7%)3 (42.9%)106 (96.4%)
n157110
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/joss-2018-009 | Journal eISSN: 1529-1227 | Journal ISSN: 2300-0422
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 34
Published on: Oct 10, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Elizabeth Humberstone, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.