
Figure 1:
Sampling method for nematodes present in the soil in each coffee plantation.
Table 1.
Physical characterization of soil samples collected at a depth of 0–10 cm from the following areas in Araponga, Minas Gerais, Brazil: forest fragment (FF) and coffee plantations naturally fertilized (NF), fertilized with poultry litter (PL) or cow manure (CM).
| Physical attributes (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Textural class | TP | Micro | Macro | SM | |
| NF | Clayey | 56.02 ± 1.08 | 34.79 ± 0.99 | 21.23 ± 1.55 | 25.80 ± 1.43 |
| PL | Clayey | 59.23 ± 1.68 | 36.83 ± 0.90 | 22.40 ± 1.13 | 27.23 ± 0.94 |
| CM | Clayey | 58.51 ± 1.01 | 33.27 ± 1.22 | 25.26 ± 1.79 | 30.12 ± 1.18 |
| FF | Clayey | 59.34 ± 1.95 | 32.12 ± 2.75 | 27.21 ± 2.59 | 25.67 ± 1.08 |
Table 2.
Chemical characterization soil sampled at a depth of 0–10 cm from the following areas in Araponga, Minas Gerais, Brazil: forest fragment (FF) and coffee plantations, naturally fertilized (NF), poultry litter fertilized (PL) and cow manure (CM) fertilized.
| N | P | K | OM | C:N | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | (%) | mg/dm3 | mg/dm3 | ppm | ||
| NF | 5.8 ± 0.05ns | 0.27 ± 0.01ns | 15.4 ± 0.42b | 319 ± 1.21ab | 17.65 ± 0.52a | 25.65 ± 0.23b |
| PL | 5.5 ± 0.08ns | 0.28 ± 0.01ns | 705.6 ± 6.74a | 977 ± 0.79a | 17.73 ± 0.63a | 48.21 ± 9.60a |
| CM | 5.6 ± 0.09ns | 0.27 ± 0.01ns | 46.7 ± 0.65a | 329 ± 5.37ab | 14.48 ± 0.35b | 31.01 ± 6.20a |
| FF | 5.7 ± 0.05ns | 0.29 ± 0.01ns | 3.0 ± 0.05b | 60 ± 2.43b | 19.46 ± 0.28a | 39.01 ± 7.80ab |
Table 3.
Average values (± standard error) for the total abundance of nematodes per 100 g of dry soil from an Atlantic forest fragment (FF), a naturally fertilized (NF) coffee plantation, poultry litter (PL) fertilized coffee plantation, and a coffee plantation fertilized with cow manure (CM).
| Feeding habits | FF | NF | PL | CM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterivores | 108 ± 2.73b | 170 ± 1.14b | 380 ± 7.72a | 378 ± 5.83a |
| Plant-parasites | 270 ± 5.03a | 287 ± 3.37a | 183 ± 3.12b | 128 ± 1.28b |
| Fungivores | 84 ± 2.83a | 51 ± 5.16a | 32 ± 1.12b | 13 ± 0.97b |
| Omnivores | 11 ± 0.54ns | 9 ± 0.37ns | 2 ± 0.41ns | 2 ± 0.83ns |
| Predators | 10 ± 0.73ns | 9 ± 0.37ns | 8 ± 0.24ns | 4 ± 0.25ns |
| Total | 483 ± 7.20ns | 526 ± 5.63ns | 605 ± 9.09ns | 525 ± 4.59ns |
Table 4.
Mean relative abundance of nematode genera found in soil samples from an Atlantic forest fragment (FF), a naturally fertilized (NF) coffee plantation, a poultry litter (PL) fertilized coffee plantation, and cow manure (CM) fertilized coffee plantation.
| Families | Genera | FF | NF | PL | CM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterivores | Areas | ||||
| Alaimidae | Alaimus | 0.01ns | 0.02ns | 0.00ns | 0.00ns |
| Bunonematidae | Bunonema | 0.00ns | 0.00ns | 0.01ns | 0.00ns |
| Cephalobidae | Acrobeles | 0.09b | 0.10b | 0.10b | 0.18a |
| Cephalobus | 0.05ns | 0.04ns | 0.02ns | 0.02ns | |
| Diplogastridae | Diplogaster | 0.00ns | 0.00ns | 0.03ns | 0.01ns |
| Panagrolaimidae | Panagrolaimus | 0.00ns | 0.01ns | 0.03ns | 0.01ns |
| Plectidae | Plectus | 0.01ns | 0.01ns | 0.02ns | 0.02ns |
| Wilsonema | 0.00ns | 0.01ns | 0.00ns | 0.01ns | |
| Prismatolaimidae | Prismatolaimus | 0.01ns | 0.01ns | 0.00ns | 0.00ns |
| Rhabditidae | Rhabditis | 0.05b | 0.12b | 0.38a | 0.49a |
| Teratocephalidae | Teratocephalus | 0.00ns | 0.01ns | 0.02ns | 0.00ns |
| Plant-parasites | Areas | ||||
| Anguininae | Ditylenchus* | 0.03ns | 0.02ns | 0.04ns | 0.01ns |
| Criconematidae | Criconema | 0.15a | 0.08a | 0.02b | 0.01b |
| Hoplolaimidae | Helicotylenchus | 0.21b | 0.35a | 0.20b | 0.17b |
| Longidoridae | Longidorus | 0.03ns | 0.01ns | 0.02ns | 0.02ns |
| Pratylenchidae | Pratylenchus | 0.07a | 0.04a | 0.01b | 0.00b |
| Trichodoridae | Trichodorus | 0.02ns | 0.02ns | 0.00ns | 0.00ns |
| Tylenchidae | Tylenchus | 0.05ns | 0.03ns | 0.04ns | 0.02ns |
| Fungivores | Areas | ||||
| Aphelenchidae | Aphelenchus | 0.14a | 0.07b | 0.05b | 0.02b |
| Diphtherophoridae | Diphtherophora | 0.02ns | 0.01ns | 0.00ns | 0.00ns |
| Tylencholaimellidae | Tylencholaimellus | 0.01ns | 0.01ns | 0.00ns | 0.00ns |
| Onivores | Areas | ||||
| Dorylaimidae | Dorylaimus | 0.03ns | 0.02ns | 0.00ns | 0.00ns |
| Predator | Areas | ||||
| Mononchidae | Mononchus | 0.02ns | 0.02ns | 0.01ns | 0.01ns |
Table 5.
Average values (± standard error) of Shannon and Simpson indices of nematode communities in soil samples from an Atlantic forest fragment (FF), a naturally fertilized (NF) coffee plantation, a poultry litter (PL) fertilized coffee plantation, and cow manure (CM) fertilized coffee plantation.
| Areas evaluated | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diversity indexes | FF | NF | PL | CM |
| Shannon (H’) | 2.34 ± 0.03a | 2.24 ± 0.03a | 2.09 ± 0.04a | 1.95 ± 0.06b |
| Simpson (Ds) | 0.14 ± 0.002b | 0.17 ± 0.006b | 0.20 ± 0.002b | 0.33 ± 0.002a |

Figure 2:
Average values (± standard error) of (a) the maturity, (b) the maturity 2–5, (c) the plant parasitic, (d) the basal, (e) the enrichment, and (f) the structure indexes. Values followed by the same letter did not differ when using the Tukey test (p < 0.05).

Figure 3:
Food web analysis of coffee crops fertilized with cow manure (CM), poultry litter (PL), plant residues (NF), and in a forest fragment (FF). Quadrant A: enriched and structured agroecosystem; quadrant B: mature and structured environment; quadrant C: mature and stable environment, fertile soil; and quadrant D: degraded and depleted soil. (Ferris, 2010).