Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
First record of native entomopathogenic nematodes from Montana agroecosystems Cover

First record of native entomopathogenic nematodes from Montana agroecosystems

Open Access
|Jul 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Different agricultural field sites surveyed in Montana, USA, for native entomopathogenic nematodes during 2018.

Sampling siteFarmerLatitudeLongitudeElevation (m)VegetationSoil textureSoil pHOrganic Matter (%)Presence/Absence of EPNsRe-culture*
PendroyJohn StoltzN48.04130°W112.16945°4220Wheat/CanolaClay loam8.23.9+(3)No
PendroyKevin JohnsonN48.04206°W112.20099°4328WheatSandy clay loam7.94.4+(1)No
ChoteauJoe MillerN47.56785°W112.13926°3906FallowClay7.83.2 − −
ChoteauMike LeysN47.90238°W112.3802° − WheatSandy clay loam83.3+(2)Yes (1 Steinernematid and 1 Heterorhabditid)
ValierJohn MajerusN48.18454°W111.55524° − WheatSandy clay loam8.13.4 −
ConradMark GrubN48.6334°W111.53175° − PeasSandy clay loam72.9 − −
ConradMark OrcuttN48.16259°W111.52896°3498FallowClay loam8.12.3 − −
ConradGarett GrubN47.56786°W112.13930° − Wheat/VegetablesSandy clay loam7.82.4+(2)No
KalispellRon De YongN48.1945°W114.2341° − Fallow/Winter wheatLoam8.13.4+(1)Yes (1 Steinernematid)
ValierJeremy CurryN48.3032°W112.4055°3749Fallow/WheatSandy clay loam8.22.1+(2)No
ConradZane DrishinskiN48.77764°W111.8948°3508AlfalfaClay loam6.82.8 − −
ConradWTARCN48.3076°W111.9255° − Fallow/WheatClay loam7.82.9 − −
ConradGarmanN48.27808°W111.92616°1116.05AlfalfaClay loam8.13.7 − −
Choteau (Knees)A KillionN48.00729°W111.36596°1081.26ChickpeaClay loam8.22.5 − −
KneesA KillionN48.00729°W111.36596°1081.26FlaxClay loam7.53.5+(1)No
BradyWinterhoodN47.98468°W111.84313°1112.80Fallow/Winter wheatSandy clay loam7.31.9+(1)No
CollinsChickenheadN47.95588°W111.90971°1122.68ChickpeaClay7.82.3+(1)No
ChoteauN47.91965°W112.04917°1177.36HempClay8.22.8 − −
ChoteauNesbittN47.79007°W111.16589°1224.32Durum WheatClay loam6.64.4 − −
DuttonTimsN47.83529°W111.53990°1144.20LentilsClay loam7.93.4 − −
Shelby westJohn WigandN48.56643°W111.98537°1103.57PeasSandy clay loam6.93.9 − −
Shelby westJohn WigandN48.57870°W111.99317°1087.12TriticaleSandy loam7.62.6 − −
Shelby WestJohn WigandN48.54374°W111.99096°1071.82FallowClay loam7.62.3 − −
Potter Rd ShelbyJohn WigandN48.65339°W111.96044°1057.40FallowClay loam7.92.7 − −
SunburstKoeye FauqueN48.82692°W111.85641°1093.77ChickpeaSandy clay loam82.9+(1)No
SunburstKoeye FauqueN48.82701°W111.81002°1102.46Spring wheatClay loam8.22.3 − −
TiberDuncanN48.19011°W111.25206°993.03FallowClay loam8.22.6 − −
TiberPaul KolstadN48.17184°W111.17372°960.91FallowClay loam8.12.3 − −
TiberWicksN48.23188°W111.14511°1029.37Lentil/FallowClay loam7.72.5 − −
TiberBroadhurstN48.27280°W111.14571°930.70FallowClay loam8.12.6 − −

1 Notes: The number in the parenthesis represents the number of positive samples with nematodes. *Reculture means if we were able to reculture EPN isolates found from the samples in G. mellonella

Table 2

Morphological characters of 3rd stage infective juveniles for three entomopathogenic nematode isolates from Montana, USA.

CharacterSteinernema feltiae 1Steinernema feltiae 2ANOVA resultsHeterorhabditis bacteriophora
L820.25±11.16 (711-900)a 807.85±9.60 (743-906)a t=0.82, df=37, P=0.11602.25±9.48 (513-654)
D28.48±0.73 (22-34.4)a 29.93±0.57 (26-35)a t=−1.63, df=36, P=0.1124.74±0.64 (18-31)
EP64.45±1.94 (48-80)a 55.25±1.72 (43-67)b t=3.45, df=37, P=0.00177.35±2.24 (55-95)
NR72±2.83 (42-91)a 59.65±2.01 (48-81)b t=3.47, df=34, P=0.00178.2±1.32 (68-90)
ES90.2±2.97 (61-114)a 87.7±2.02 (48-81)a t=0.68, df=33, P=0.50106.5±3.10 (93-140)
T79.34±1.49 (61-90)a 80.85±1.09 (74-89)a t=−0.82, df=35, P=0.4291.26±4.52 (56-140.3)
A29.15±0.81 (24.58-39.68)a 27.19±0.6 (23.23-32.78)a t=1.90, df=36, P=0.0724.34±0.60 (14.93-28.5)
B9.31±0.36 (7.45-13.15)a 9.31±0.25 (7.40-11.13)a t=0.0, df=34, P=1.005.65±0.18 (3.063-5.52)
C10.40±0.21 (8.67-13.14)a 10.02±0.16 (8.78-11.19)a t=1.63, df=37, P=0.116.60±0.29 (2.10-9.16)
D%72.42±2.36 (55.24-87.91)a 63.62±2.37 (39.81-83.33)a t=−1.63, df=36, P=0.1172.63±2.61 (72.29-59.14)
E%81.60±2.63 (63.16-108.11)a 68.42±2.11 (51.81-86.84)b t=3.82, df=36, P=0.000584.75±5.04 (49.52-98.21)

1 Notes: n=20. L, body length; D, maximum body diameter; EP, distance from anterior end to excretory pore; NR, distance from anterior end to nerve ring; ES, oesophagus length; T, tail length; A=L/D; B=L/ES; C=L/T; D%=EP/ES ×100; E%=EP/T×100. Figures are showing means ± standard error (µm). For Steinernema felitae isolates, means ± SE followed by the same letters are not significantly different at the (α=0.05).

Table 3

Morphological characteristics of males of three entomopathogenic nematode isolates from Montana, USA.

CharacterSteinernema feltiae 1 (1st gen.)Steinernema feltiae 2 (1st gen.) t-test resultsHeterorhabditis bacteriophora (2nd gen.)
L1570.35±36.84 (1259-1813)a 1304.8±43.3 (913-1570)b t=4.55, df=37, P<0.0001802.1±20.16 (610-920)
D96.93±3.01 (76-130)a 96.05±3.14 (65-119)a t=0.20, df=38, P=0.8562.3±1.99 (50-78)
EP90.06±2.25 (73-115)a 93±1.55 (84-109)a t=−1.05, df=34, P=0.3077.9±1.17 (70-90)
NR98.35±1.63 (88-113)a 100±1.18 (88-110)a t=−0.80, df=35, P=0.4380.45±1.32 (70-91)
ES145.55±2.80 (121-167)b 164.55±1.72 (154-180)a t=−5.63, df=32, P<0.0001110.25±1.97 (97-129)
T41.65±0.75 (36-48)b 52.75±2.62 (34-72) a t=−3.96, df=22, P=0.000661.58±3.59 (41-110)
ABD44.72±1.07 (35-51)b 62.85±3.00 (45-91)a t=−5.56, df=24, P<0.000134.51±0.67 (30-39.4)
SP80.35±1.41 (67-92)a 71.5±2.21 (58-98)b t=4.49, df=36, P<0.000141±1.26 (32-51)
GU49.95±1.11 (41-59) a 45.85±0.86 (40-53) b t=2.85, df=36, P=0.00722.95±0.74 (14-28)
D%62.09±1.47 (49.08-72.34)a 56.56±0.86 (51.14-65.19)a t=0.20, df=38, P=0.8570.90±1.19 (63.2-83.50)
SW%181.27±4.51 (145.65-235.90)a 117.34±6.81 (63.74-168)a t=7.63, df=33, P<0.0001119.83±4.69 (91.37-164.52)
GS%62.74±2.13 (49.40-85.51)a 66.35±2.16 (51.19-91.38)a t=−1.16, df=38, P=0.2556.85±2.61 (41.18-87.5)

1 Notes: n=20. L, body length; D, maximum body diameter; EP, distance from anterior end to excretory pore; NR, distance from anterior end to nerve ring; ES, oesophagus length; T, tail length; ABD, anal body diameter; SP, spicule length; GU, gubernaculum length; D%=EP/ES×100; SW%=SP/ABD×100; GS%=GU/SP×100. For Steinernema felitae isolates, means ± SE followed by the same letters are not significantly different at the (α=0.05). Figures are showing means ± standard error (µm)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2020-060 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 11
Submitted on: Dec 27, 2019
Published online: Jul 6, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Ramandeep K. Sandhi, Ratnasri Pothula, Satyendra K. Pothula, Byron J. Adams, Gadi V.P. Reddy, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.