Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Description of Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. and a Belgian population of Rotylenchus buxophilus (Tylenchomorpha: Hoplolaimidae)

Open Access
|Apr 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Rotylenchus rhomboids n. sp., (drawings ♀). (A) entire body; (B) en face view; (C) head region; (D) esophageal region; (E) lateral field at vulva region; (F) vulva region; (G) tail region; (H) lateral field at tail region. (B, C based on SEM illustrations) (A, E, F, G, H: Holotype) (Scale bar: A: 25 µm; B: 5 µm; C: 20 µm; D–H: 25 µm).
Rotylenchus rhomboids n. sp., (drawings ♀). (A) entire body; (B) en face view; (C) head region; (D) esophageal region; (E) lateral field at vulva region; (F) vulva region; (G) tail region; (H) lateral field at tail region. (B, C based on SEM illustrations) (A, E, F, G, H: Holotype) (Scale bar: A: 25 µm; B: 5 µm; C: 20 µm; D–H: 25 µm).

Figure 2

Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. (LM ♀). (A) esophageal region; (D) vulva region; (E) lateral field at vulva region with a rhomboid widening (see arrow); (G) entire body; (H) tail region; (I) lateral field with phasmid at tail region (SEM ♀); (B) anterior body region, lateral view; (C) en face view (arrow indicates amphid aperture); (F) vulva region, lateral view; (J) vulva region, ventral view; (K) tail region of female, lateral view; (L) tail region of female, oblique ventral view; (M) tail region of juveniles (D, E, G, H, I: Holotype; others paratypes) (Scale bar: B, C: 1 µm; A, D–M: 25 µm).
Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. (LM ♀). (A) esophageal region; (D) vulva region; (E) lateral field at vulva region with a rhomboid widening (see arrow); (G) entire body; (H) tail region; (I) lateral field with phasmid at tail region (SEM ♀); (B) anterior body region, lateral view; (C) en face view (arrow indicates amphid aperture); (F) vulva region, lateral view; (J) vulva region, ventral view; (K) tail region of female, lateral view; (L) tail region of female, oblique ventral view; (M) tail region of juveniles (D, E, G, H, I: Holotype; others paratypes) (Scale bar: B, C: 1 µm; A, D–M: 25 µm).

Figure 3

BI phylogenetic tree generated from the D2-D3 of 28S rDNA region data set with the HKY + G model (94 parameters). Bayesian posterior probabilities are given next to each node. Sequences of Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. and R. buxophilus (Belgium) are in bold.
BI phylogenetic tree generated from the D2-D3 of 28S rDNA region data set with the HKY + G model (94 parameters). Bayesian posterior probabilities are given next to each node. Sequences of Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. and R. buxophilus (Belgium) are in bold.

Figure 4

BI phylogenetic tree generated from ITS sequences with HKY + G model (70 parameters). Bayesian posterior probabilities are given next to each node. Sequences of Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. and R. buxophilus (Belgium) are in bold.
BI phylogenetic tree generated from ITS sequences with HKY + G model (70 parameters). Bayesian posterior probabilities are given next to each node. Sequences of Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. and R. buxophilus (Belgium) are in bold.

Figure 5

BI phylogenetic tree generated from COI sequences with the GTR +G + I model (77 parameters). Bayesian posterior probabilities are given next to each node. Sequences of Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. and R. buxophilus (Belgium) are in bold.
BI phylogenetic tree generated from COI sequences with the GTR +G + I model (77 parameters). Bayesian posterior probabilities are given next to each node. Sequences of Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. and R. buxophilus (Belgium) are in bold.

Figure 6

The cluster analysis of 104 species (included Rotylenchus n. sp.) based on Bray–Curtis similarity measure of 11 ranked features. Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. is in bold. The dotted line indicates 85% similarity.
The cluster analysis of 104 species (included Rotylenchus n. sp.) based on Bray–Curtis similarity measure of 11 ranked features. Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp. is in bold. The dotted line indicates 85% similarity.

Figure 7

Belgian population of Rotylenchus buxophilus (LM ♀). (A) entire body; (B) esophageal region; (C) lateral field at vulva region; (D) vulva region; (E) lateral field with phasmid at tail region; (F) tail region (Scale bar: A–F: 25 µm).
Belgian population of Rotylenchus buxophilus (LM ♀). (A) entire body; (B) esophageal region; (C) lateral field at vulva region; (D) vulva region; (E) lateral field with phasmid at tail region; (F) tail region (Scale bar: A–F: 25 µm).

Morphometric data of Rotylenchus buxophilus from Belgium_ All measurements are in μm (except for ratio) and in the form: mean ± sd (range)_

CharacterFemales
n 15
Body length (L)972 ± 87 (818–1065)
a = L/MBD30.1 ± 1.9 (27.2–32.5)
b″ = L/Anterior end to the end of esophageal gland7.0 ± 0.8 (5.3–8.2)
c = L/Tail length40.1 ± 4.1 (34.6–49.8)
c″ = Tail length/ABD1.2 ± 0.1 (1.0–1.4)
V = Anterior end to vulva/L × 10053 ± 3 (48–58)
Lip height7 ± 0.3 (6–8)
Lip width11 ± 0.6 (10–12)
Stylet length36 ± 1.6 (32–38)
Conus length18 ± 1.1 (16–20)
Shaft length14 ± 0.7 (13–14)
Knob height4 ± 0.6 (3–5)
Dorsal gland opening from stylet base4 ± 1.2 (3–7)
Anterior end to secretory-excretory pore123 ± 10 (105–139)
Anterior end to nerve ring99 ± 7 (87–109)
Anterior end to esophageal gland end140 ± 11 (124–157)
Esophagus overlapping22 ± 5 (18–28)
Max body diameter (MBD)32 ± 2 (29–37)
Anal body diameter (ABD)21 ± 1.6 (19–24)
Tail length24 ± 3.1 (18–28)
Tail annuli number14 ± 1.3 (12–16)

Comparison of the matrix code of Rotylenchus rhomboides n_ sp_ with other closely related species_

SpeciesABCDEFGHIJK
Rotylenchus rhomboides n. sp.3–42122221–2222
R. buxophilus from Belgium41142233221
R. buxophilus 41142233221
R. corsicus 41122223221
R. goodeyi 31142242212
R. gracilidens 31122231211
R. incultus 41141231211
R. laurentinus 41132231212
R. pumilus 41141221212
R. rugatocuticulatus 32123241211

The measurements of known and new populations of Rotylenchus buxophilus_

Female R. buxophilus (Belgian population) R. buxophilus Golden (1956) R. buxophilus Sher (1965) R. buxophilus = R. sheri Jairajpuri (1963) R. buxophilus Geraert and Barooti (1996) R. buxophilus Wouts and Sturhan (1999)
Host, locationYam (Dioscorea tokoro), BelgiumEnglish boxwood (Buxus sempervirens var. suffruticosa L.), USAcamellia (Camellia japonica L.), France Cedrus libani var. deodara, India Magnolia sp. L., IranCabbage tree (Cordyline sp. Comm, ex R.Br.), New Zealand
n 1520201046
L972 (818–1065)1,090920–1,310900–1,200850–1,0701,020–1,250
V53 (48–58)5552–5852–5654–5855–58
STL36 (32–38)33.534–3835–393438–40
a30.1 (27.2–32.5)3128–3827–3525–3232–43
b7.0 (5.3–8.2)76.4–8.95.5–7.06–87.3–8.7
c40.1 (34.6–49.8)4336–4838–4733–4541–58
c′1.2 (1.0–1.4)1.1–1.40.8–1.2

Rotylenchus species and populations used and sequenced in the present study_

Accession number
Species28SITS COI HostLocality
H. dihystera AB933471 SugarcaneJapan
H. multicinctus MF401446 BananaGreece
H. columbus FJ485623 UnknownUSA
H. seinhorsti KX446971 UnknownChina
R. arasbaranensis KJ765335KJ765345 GrassesIran
KJ765336KJ765346 GrassesIran
R. brevicaudatus JX015419 GrassesAustralia
JX015420 GrassesAustralia
JX015431 GrassesAustralia
R. buxophilus JX015421 USA
KJ765337 Euonymus sp.Iran
KJ765338 Euonymus sp.Iran
KJ765340 Euonymus sp.Iran
KU722390 Iran
JX015432 UnknownUSA
JX015433 UnknownUSA
KJ765347 Euonymus sp.Iran
R. buxophilus MK114140 MK114142 MK114155 Dioscorea tokoro Belgium
MK114141 MK114143 MK114156 Dioscorea tokoro Belgium
R. castilloi KM251415 Fagus orientalis Lipsky (oriental beech tree)Iran
R. cazorlaensis JX015399 Quercus faginea (Portuguese oak)Spain
JX015400 Quercus faginea (Portuguese oak)Spain
R. conicaudatus HQ700698 GrassesIran
R. cretensis KT288060 OliveGreece
R. cypriensis KP843116 Prunus sp.Iran
KT288062 OliveGreece
R. dalikhaniensis KM042108 Ruscus hyrcanus WoronowIran
R. eximius KX398058 Tamarix smyrnensis Greece
KX669231 KX669244OliveTunisia
KX669232 OliveTunisia
KX669233 KX669245OliveTunisia
JX015401 Pistacia lentiscus (lentisc)Italy
JX015402 Pistacia lentiscus (lentisc)Italy
R. goodeyi DQ328756 Olea europaea subsp. silvestris (wild olive)Spain
R. incultus KX669234 OliveTunisia
KX669235 OliveTunisia
KX669236 OliveTunisia
JX015403 Vitis vinifera (grapevine)Spain
KX669246OliveTunisia
KX669247OliveTunisia
KX669248OliveTunisia
KX669249OliveTunisia
R. iranicus HQ700697 Unidentified forest treeIran
R. jaeni JX015404 Quercus suber (cork tree)Spain
R. laurentinus DQ328757 JX015405 Pistacia lentiscus (lentisc)Italy
JX015406 Pistacia lentiscus (lentisc)Italy
JX015407 Pistacia lentiscus (lentisc)Italy
EU280798 Pistacia lentiscus (lentisc)Spain
R. magnus JX015409 Ilex aquifolium (holly)Spain
JX015410 Ilex aquifolium (holly)Spain
R. paravitis JX015422 JX015415 Helianthus annuus (sunflower)Spain
JX015416 Helianthus annuus (sunflower)Spain
R. pumilus JX015423JX015435 Urtica sp.USA
JX015436 Urtica sp.USA
R. rhomboides n. sp. MK114123 MK114127 MK114144 Musa basjoo Belgium
MK114124 MK114128 MK114145 Musa basjoo Belgium
MK114125 MK114129 MK114146 Musa basjoo Belgium
MK114126 MK114130 Musa basjoo Belgium
MK114131 Musa basjoo Belgium
MK296738 Musa basjoo Belgium
R. robustus JX015424 JX015413 Pinus pinea (stone pine)Spain
JX015425JX015438 GrassesUSA
JX015426JX015439JX015411GrassesUSA
JX015440 GrassesUSA
JX015414 Pinus pinea (stone pine)Spain
R. sardashtensis KP843115KP843113 Unidentified grassesIran
R. striaticeps KJ765343 Unidentified forest treeIran
KJ765344 Unidentified forest treeIran
KU722389 UnknownIran
KP718973UnknownIran
R. unisexus EU373674 Citrus aurantium (citrus)Spain
EU373675 Citrus aurantium (citrus)Spain
R. urmiaensis KP718966 KP718971 Corylus spp.Iran
KP718967 KP718972 Corylus spp.Iran
R. vitis JN032581 JX015417 Vitis vinifera (grapevine)Spain
JX015418 Vitis vinifera (grapevine)Spain
S. brachyurus JX472089 Sansevieria laurentii USA
S. truncatum KX959308UnknownUSA

Morphometric data of Rotylenchus rhomboides n_ sp_ All measurements are in μm (except for ratio) and in the form: mean ± sd (range)_

CharacterHolotype femaleParatype females
n 112
Body length (L)827861 ± 101 (634–1049)
a = L/MBD28.531.8 ± 2.8 (27.8–35.1)
b’ = L/Anterior end to the end of esophageal gland7.66.9 ± 0.5 (5.6–7.6)
c = L/Tail length5563.3 ± 10.7 (50.3–85.5)
c’ = Tail length/ABD680.7 ± 0.1 (0.5–0.8)
V = Anterior end to vulva/L × 1005956 ± 2.6 (53–61)
Lip height66 ± 0.7 (5–7)
Lip width1110 ± 0.8 (8–11)
Stylet length3533 ± 1.5 (31–37)
Conus length1717 ± 0.8 (16–18)
Shaft length1413 ± 0.9 (12–14)
Knob height33 ± 0.4 (3–4)
Dorsal gland opening from stylet base43 ± 0.9 (2–5)
Anterior end to secretory-excretory pore100107 ± 10.6 (77–123)
Anterior end to nerve ring7886 ± 9.9 (60–96)
Anterior end to esophageal gland end108125 ± 10.5 (108–146)
Esophagus overlapping1214 ± 2.3 (9–19)
Max body diameter (MBD)2927 ± 2.3 (23–31)
Anal body diameter (ABD)2220 ± 1.8 (16–23)
Tail length1514 ± 2.0 (9–16)
Tail annuli number1110 ± 1.0 (8–11)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2019-023 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 20
Submitted on: Dec 18, 2018
Published on: Apr 24, 2019
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Huu Tien Nguyen, Quang Phap Trinh, Marjolein Couvreur, Phougeishangbam Rolish Singh, Wilfrida Decraemer, Wim Bert, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.