References
- Beattie, V., Collins, B., & Mcinnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: A simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6(1). 1-12.
- Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Research Monograph. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
- Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 261-280.
- Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J., & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/ DRO/DU:30036968
- Booth, P., Luckett, P., & Mladenovic, R. (1999). The quality of learning in accounting education: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Accounting Education, 8(4), 277-300.
- Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.
- Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2014). Making the case for space: The effect of learning spaces on teaching and learning. Curriculum and Teaching, 29(1), 5-19.
- Cleveland, B., Newton, C., Fisher, K., Wilks, S., Bower, B., & Robinson, N. (2016). Review of standard entitlement frameworks for schools & school site size and outdoor space requirements (including Special Schools & Special Developmental Schools). Department of Education and Training. Study 2 & 4 – Recommendations for an updated facilities framework & proposed School Facility Area Guidelines. (Unpublished report). Melbourne: LEaRN.
- Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture, 79(1), 43-63.
- Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Retrieved from: http://www.michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/3897.Rich_Seam_web.pdf
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Imms, W., Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. E. (2016). Evaluating learning environments. Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
- Kimbell, L. (2009). Beyond design thinking: Design-as-practice and designs-in-practice. Paper presented at the CRESC 5th Annual Conference. University of Manchester, Manchester.
- Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.
- LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.).San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Lyke, J. A., & Young, A. J. K. (2006). Cognition in context: Students’ perceptions of classroom goal structures and reported cognitive strategy use in the college classroom. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 477-490.
- McEntee, K., Brandalise, I., Goncalves, R. D., Riendeau, S., Thao, K., & Grocott, L. (2016). Archipelago of possibilities: Priming teachers to reflect on intrinsic motivations for change. Pilot project report. ILETC Project. Retrieved from http://www.iletc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/archipelago-report-for-ILETC-project.pdf
- Ministry of Education. (2011). The New Zealand school property strategy 2011-2021. Retrieved from: http://www. minedu.govt.nz/NZEducation/EducationPolicies/Schools/SchoolOperations/~/media/MinEdu/Files/ EducationSectors/PrimarySecondary/PropertyToolbox/StateSchools/SchoolPropertyStrategy201121. pdf
- Ministry of Education. (2016a). The impact of physical design on student outcomes. Retrieved from: http://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Primary-Secondary/Property/School-property-design/Flexible-learning-spaces/FLS-The-impact-of-physical-design-on-student-outcomes.pdf
- Ministry of Education. (2016b). Māui whakakau, kura whakakau – the impact of physical design on Maori and Pasifika student outcomes. Retrieved from: http://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Primary-Secondary/Property/School-property-design/Flexible-learning-spaces/FLS-Maui-whakakau-kura-whakakau.pdf
- Monahan, T. (2005). Globalization, technological change, and public education. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Newton, C., Wilks, S., Hes, D., Aibinu, A., Crawford, R. H., Goodwin, K., & Aye, L. (2012). More than a survey: An interdisciplinary post-occupancy tracking of BER schools. Architectural Science Review, 55(3), 196-205.
- Organisation for Economic and Co-operative Development (OECD). (2013). Innovative learning environments, educational research and innovation. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264203488-en
- Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
- Tait, K. (2009). Understanding tertiary student learning: Are they independent thinkers or simply consumers and reactors? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 97-207.
- Woodman, K. (2011). Re-placing flexibility: An investigation into flexibility in learning spaces and learning.(Unpublished thesis), Melbourne University, Melbourne.
- Woolner, P., Clark, J., Laing, K., Thomas, U., & Tiplady, L. (2014). A school tries to change: How leaders and teachers understand changes to space and practices in a UK secondary school. Improving Schools, 17(2), 148-162.
- Zhao, Y. (2011). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.