Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Discrepancies in Rh(D) typing of sensitized red blood cells using monoclonal/polyclonal anti-D reagents: case report and review Cover

Discrepancies in Rh(D) typing of sensitized red blood cells using monoclonal/polyclonal anti-D reagents: case report and review

By: B.J. Padget and  J.L. Hannon  
Paid access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. Landsteiner K, Wiener AS. An agglutinable factor in human blood recognized by immune sera for rhesus blood. Proc Soc Exp Biol NY 1940;43:223.10.3181/00379727-43-11151
  2. Standards for blood banks and transfusion services. 19th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Association of Blood Banks, 1999.
  3. Standards for transfusion medicine. 6th ed. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (Canada). Canadian Society for Transfusion Medicine, 1999.
  4. Gamma Biologicals; Houston, TX. Package insert: anti-D (monoclonal/polyclonal blend) Gammaclone®, 1996.
  5. Dominion Biologicals Limited; Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada. Package insert: anti-D (monoclonal/ polyclonal blend) Novaclone™, 1996.
  6. Gamma Biologicals; Houston, TX. Package insert: anti-D (monoclonal blend) Gamma-clone®, 2000.
  7. Vengelen-Tyler V, ed. Technical manual. 13th ed. Bethesda MD: American Association of Blood Banks, 1999.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-534 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 13
Published on: Oct 14, 2020
Published by: American National Red Cross
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 B.J. Padget, J.L. Hannon, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.