A field analysis trial comparing the turnaround times of routine and STAT red blood cell immunohematology testing

Sackett, K.; Kjell, A.; Schneider, A.M.; Cohn, C.S.

doi:10.21307/immunohematology-2019-001

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

A field analysis trial comparing the turnaround times of routine and STAT red blood cell immunohematology testing

Immunohematology

Volume 33 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

By: K. Sackett, A. Kjell, A.M. Schneider and C.S. Cohn

Paid access

|Oct 2019

References

Cheng D, Hao Y. Comparative evaluation of the microcolumn gel card test and the conventional tube test for measurement of titers of immunoglobulin G antibodies to blood group A and blood group B. J Int Med Res 2011;39:934–43.10.1177/14732300110390032821819727
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Finck R, Lui-Deguzman C, Teng SM, Davis R, Yuan S. Comparison of a gel microcolumn assay with the conventional tube test for red blood cell alloantibody titration. Transfusion 2013;53:811–15.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03793.x22804101
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-001 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 1 - 5

Published on: Oct 9, 2019

Published by: American National Red Cross

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Keywords:

immunohematology,

red blood cell testing,

VISION,

Related subjects:

© 2019 K. Sackett, A. Kjell, A.M. Schneider, C.S. Cohn, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous article Volume 33 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)Next article