Performance evaluation of vertical handover in Internet of Vehicles Cover

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Performance evaluation of vertical handover in Internet of Vehicles

International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems

Volume 14 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)

By: Shaik Mazhar Hussain, Kamaludin Mohamad Yusof, Shaik Ashfaq Hussain and Rolito Asuncion

Open Access

|Jun 2021

Figures & Tables

Workflow procedure of ANDSF (Ndashimye et al., 2020).

Proposed system model.

Workflow of dynamic Q-learning.

Fuzzy-convolutional neural network.

Comparison of mean handover (Ndashimye et al., 2020; Sheng et al., 2018).

Comparison of HO failure (Ndashimye et al., 2020; Sheng et al., 2018).

Comparison of throughput (Ndashimye et al., 2020; Sheng et al., 2018).

Comparison of end-to-end delay (Ndashimye et al., 2020; Sheng et al., 2018).

Comparison on packet loss (Ndashimye et al., 2020; Sheng et al., 2018).

Comparison of HO efficiency_

Method	Average number of HO	Better efficiency	Average HO_FR	Better efficiency
Conventional	5.51	55%	0.133	90%
TOPSIS	2.15	20%	0.041	40%
ANDSF-HO	3.57	30%	0.069	60%
V2I-MoLoHA	3.03	25%	0.029	20%
Proposed	1.30	–	0.01	–

Fuzzy rules_

	Input
Rule number	S_r	Distance	V_D	Data type	LoS	Output
R1	H	H	H	H	H	H
R2	H	H	H	H	L	H
R3	H	H	H	L	H	M
R4	H	H	H	L	L	M
R5	H	H	L	H	H	H
R6	H	H	L	H	L	M
R7	H	H	L	L	H	L
R8	H	H	L	L	L	M
R9	H	L	H	H	H	H
R10	H	L	H	H	L	L
R11	H	L	H	L	H	L
R12	H	L	H	L	L	L
R13	H	L	L	H	H	H
R14	H	L	L	H	L	M
R15	H	L	L	L	H	L
R16	H	L	L	L	L	M
R17	L	H	H	H	H	H
R18	L	H	H	H	L	L
R19	L	H	H	L	H	H
R20	L	H	H	L	L	M
R21	L	H	L	H	H	H
R22	L	H	L	H	L	H
R23	L	H	L	L	H	L
R24	L	H	L	L	L	L
R25	L	L	H	H	H	H
R26	L	L	H	H	L	M
R27	L	L	H	L	H	L
R28	L	L	H	L	L	L
R29	L	L	L	H	H	M
R30	L	L	L	H	L	M
R31	L	L	L	L	H	L
R32	L	L	L	L	L	L

Simulation specifications_

Parameter	Range/Value
Simulation area	2,500 m × 2,500 m
Number of vehicles	100
Number of 5G mmWave BSs	2
Number of 4G LTE BSs	2
Vehicle mobility type	Linear mobility
Vehicle speed	10-40 m/s
Transmission range
DSRC	300 m (Max)
mmWave	~500 m
LTE	100 km (Max)
Transmission rate	3-5 packets per second
Packet size	512 bytes
Simulation time	1,000 sec

Comparison of throughput and delay_

Method	Mean T (kbps)	Better efficiency	Average delay (ms)	Better efficiency
Conventional	13.7	46%	39	21%
TOPSIS	35.96	23%	30	12%
ANDSF-HO	25	34%	37	19%
V2I-MoLoHA	31.89	27%	34	16%
Proposed	58.89	–	18	–

Comparison of packet loss_

Method	Packet loss (%)	Better efficiency
Conventional	48	21%
TOPSIS	32.4	12%
ANDSF-HO	24	19%
V2I-MoLoHA	18.8	16%
Proposed	12	–

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2021-012 | Journal eISSN: 1178-5608

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 1 - 16

Submitted on: Jan 16, 2021

|

Published on: Jun 28, 2021

Published by: Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

Internet of Vehicles,

Network selection,

Vertical handover

Related subjects:

Introductions and overviews,

Engineering, other

© 2021 Shaik Mazhar Hussain, Kamaludin Mohamad Yusof, Shaik Ashfaq Hussain, Rolito Asuncion, published by Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous article Volume 14 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)Next article