QRS complex detection and R–R interval computation based on discrete wavelet transform

Hamad Alhussainy, Aqeel M.

QRS complex detection and R–R interval computation based on discrete wavelet transform

International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems

Volume 13 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)

By:

Aqeel M. Hamad Alhussainy

Open Access

|Jul 2020

Figures & Tables

Flowchart of signal reconstruction with approximation coefficients only.

The signal and its reconstruction using approximation coefficient only.

Results of different stages of the proposed system.

Results of proposed method for (S20081m) record.

Results of proposed method for (e0106m) record.

R peak detection for (10) record with (1 min) for (LTSTDB) database_

Record	Method	Actual peak	Detected peak	FP	FN	Sen(%)	+P(%)	DER(%)	Acc(%)
S20011m	Park et al. (2017)	70	69	1	1	98.57	98.57	2.9	97.18
	Proposed	70	70	0	0	100	100	0	100
S20021m	Park et al. (2017)	72	71	1	1	98.61	98.61	2.8	97.26
	Proposed	72	72	0	0	100	100	0	100
S20031m	Park et al. (2017)	76	75	2	1	98.68	97.40	0.04	96.5
	Proposed	76	76	0	0	100	100	0	100
S20061m	Park et al. (2017)	92	92	2	0	100	97.87	3.2	97.87
	Proposed	92	92	0	0	100	100	0	100
S20081m	Park et al. (2017)	79	78	4	1	98.73	95.12	6.4	93.97
	Proposed	79	79	0	0	100	100	0	100
S20091m	Park et al. (2017)	106	105	0	1	99.06	100	0.95	99.05
	Proposed	106	106	0	0	100	100	0	100
S20111m	Park et al. (2017)	84	84	5	0	100	94.38	5.9	94.38
	Proposed	84	80	1	4	95.23	98.76	6.25	94.12
S20121m	Park et al. (2017)	60	60	3	0	100	95.24	5	95.63
	Proposed	60	60	0	0	100	100	0	100
S20131m	Park et al. (2017)	78	77	2	1	98.72	97.47	3.9	96.25
	Proposed	78	78	0	0	100	100	0	100
S20571m	Park et al. (2017)	91	90	3	1	98.90	96.77	4.4	95.74
	Proposed	91	89	2	2	97.8	97.8	4.5	95.7
Total	Park et al. (2017)	808	801	23	7	99.13	97.14	3.74	96.389
	Proposed	808	804	3	6	99.87	99.628	1.19	98.89

R–R time for each beat of the record e0108m and the corresponding heart rate_

Beat no. number peak	R–R time	HR	Beat no.	R–R time	HR
1	1.1440	52	17	1.0320	58
2	0.8720	69	18	1.0160	59
3	1.1400	53	19	1.0800	56
4	1.1000	55	20	1.1480	52
5	1.0800	56	21	1.1080	54
6	1.1280	53	22	1.1360	53
7	1.1240	53	23	1.1400	53
8	1.1080	54	24	1.1560	52
9	1.0560	57	25	1.1120	54
10	1.0840	55	26	1.1320	53
11	1.1080	54	27	1.1480	53
12	1.0920	55	28	1.1280	53
13	1.0600	57	29	1.0800	56
14	1.0560	57	30	1.1120	54
15	1.1000	55	31	1.1360	53
16	1.0840	55	32	1.0960	55

R peak detection for (10) record with (1 min) for (EDB) database_

Recored	Method	Actual peak	Detected peak	FP	FN	Sen(%)	+P(%)	DER(%)	Acc(%)
e0103m	Park et al. (2017)	60	60	2	0	100	96.77	3.33	96.77
	Proposed	60	60	0	0	100	100	0	100
e0104m	Park et al. (2017)	72	70	1	2	97.22	98.59	4.16	95.89
	Proposed	72	72	0	0	100	100	0	100
e0105m	Park et al. (2017)	54	54	2	0	100	96.43	3.84	96.29
	Proposed	54	54	0	0	100	100	0	100
e0106m	Park et al. (2017)	57	55	1	2	96.49	98.21	5.45	94.82
	Proposed	57	57	0	0	100	100	0	100
e0107m	Park et al. (2017)	52	49	2	3	94.23	96.08	10.2	92.45
	Proposed	52	52	0	0	100	100	0	100
e0108m	Park et al. (2017)	54	54	3	0	100	94.74	5.55	94.73
	Proposed	54	52	2	2	96.29	96.29	7.69	92.85
e0121m	Park et al. (2017)	75	74	3	1	98.67	96.10	4.05	94.87
	Proposed	75	75	0	0	100	100	0	100
e0166m	Park et al. (2017)	51	50	0	1	98.04	100	2	98.04
	Proposed	51	51	0	0	100	100	0	100
e0202m	Park et al. (2017)	85	84	2	1	98.82	97.67	3.57	96.55
	Proposed	85	85	0	0	100	100	0	100
e0818m	Park et al. (2017)	69	69	2	1	98.55	97.14	4.16	95.83
	Proposed	69	69	0	0	100	100	0	100
Total	Park et al. (2017)	629	618	18	11	98.55	97.14	4.69	95.51
	Proposed	629	627	2	2	99.682	99.682	0.318	99.366

The R–R time for each beat of the record S20121m and the corresponding heart rate_

Beat no. number peak	R–R time	HR	Beat no.	R–R time	HR
1	0.9960	60	17	1.0200	59
2	1.0240	59	18	0.9920	60
3	1.0240	59	19	1.0160	60
4	0.9920	60	20	1.0040	59
5	1.0240	59	21	0.9840	60
6	1.0000	60	22	1.0120	61
7	1.0120	59	23	0.9800	59
8	1.0240	59	24	1.0040	61
9	1.0040	60	25	1.0000	60
10	1.0080	60	26	0.9520	63
11	1.0120	59	27	1.0120	59
12	1.0160	59	28	0.9600	63
13	1.0000	60	29	0.9880	61
14	1.0200	59	30	0.9840	61
15	1.0080	60	31	0.9840	61
16	1.0120	59	32	0.9680	62

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2020-010 | Journal eISSN: 1178-5608

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 1 - 11

Submitted on: Apr 15, 2020

Published on: Jul 3, 2020

Published by: Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

DWT,

RR,

HR,

QRS,

LTSTDB,

EDB

Related subjects:

Engineering,

Introductions and overviews,

Engineering, other

© 2020 Aqeel M. Hamad Alhussainy, published by Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous article Volume 13 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)Next article

QRS complex detection and R–R interval computation based on discrete wavelet transform

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Figure 2:

Figure 3:

Figure 4:

Figure 5:

Figure 6:

Figure 7:

Figure 8:

R peak detection for (10) record with (1 min) for (LTSTDB) database_

R–R time for each beat of the record e0108m and the corresponding heart rate_

R peak detection for (10) record with (1 min) for (EDB) database_

The R–R time for each beat of the record S20121m and the corresponding heart rate_

Paradigm

My account