Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
OPERATION PROCESS AND PLAN TABLE OF SCHEDULING PLAN
| j | sort x 1,x 2,x 3 | k | ϕj | T(ϕj ) | N(ϕj ) |
| artillery B scheduling plan | x 2 x 1 x 3 | 1 | (support point B, 8) | 2 | 1 |
| artillery A scheduling plan | x 1 x 3 x 2 | 3 | (support point A, 5), | 3 | 3 |
| artillery C scheduling plan | x 2 x 1 | 2 | (support point B, 2) | 4 | 2 |
| artillery D scheduling plan | x 3 x 2 x 1 | 3 | (support point C, 6) | (10) | (4) |
MONITORING DATA OF MAINTENANCE POINTS
| repair point/time point | 1 | 7 | 14 | 21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| artillery A | 2.7349 | 5.2847 | 0.0617 | 0.7418 |
| artillery B | 2.1748 | 5.1935 | 0.0589 | 0.7049 |
| artillery C | 2.5172 | 5.1493 | 0.0626 | 0.5816 |
| artillery D | 2.4375 | 4.7218 | 0.0836 | 0.8217 |
IMPORTANCE OF MAINTENANCE POINTS
| β 1 | β 2 | β 3 | β 4 | α | λ j | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ω k | 0.455 | 0.141 | 0.263 | 0.141 | ||
| artillery A | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.4 | 1 | 0.674 |
| artillery B | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.721 |
| artillery C | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.473 |
| artillery D | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.436 |
JUDGMENT MATRIX OF EACH INDEX
| β 1 | β 2 | β 3 | β 4 | ω k | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0.455 |
| β 2 | 1/3 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 0.141 |
| β 3 | 1/2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.263 |
| β 4 | 1/3 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 0.141 |
PRIORITY OF MAINTENANCE POINTS
| Artillery A | Artillery B | Artillery C | Artillery D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| yj | 24 | 12 | 30 | 45 |
| zj | 8 | 4 | 18 | 26 |
| γj | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.60 | 0.58 |
| λj | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.47 | 0.44 |
| ζ | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
THE TRANSPORTATION TIME MATRIX BETWEEN THE SUPPORT POINTS AND THE MAINTENANCE POINTS
| yj | zj | Support point A | Support point B | Support point C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x i | 5 | 10 | 8 | ||
| artillery B | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| artillery A | 20 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 3 |
| artillery C | 30 | 18 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| artillery D | 45 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 8 |