The Role of Classroom Seating Arrangements in Friendship Formation and Persistence

Portinari Maranca, Alessandra Rister

doi:10.21307/connections-2019.043

Abstract

This research study aims to analyze the differences existing between teacher-assigned seating and free seating in classrooms in terms of their impact on students’ friendship formation across a semester. The goal is to bridge the literature on seating arrangements, spatial propinquity, and friendship networks for teenagers. Through a social network analysis of friendships in a classroom at the beginning and end of a semester in addition to the seating maps at play, it is possible to test how different seating influences adolescent social structure. This innovative way of tackling spatial propinquity in schools not only has the potential to improve our understanding of high school friendship structures and how they relate to classrooms but also to increase our knowledge of the effects of seating assignments in high schools, a practice that is widespread in the United States. This study analyzes 410 student respondents in 24 American high school classrooms longitudinally across a semester. The results were unexpected: when students choose their seats, the formation of friendships tends to be more influenced by seating proximity, and these friendships tend to be less racially homophilous than when teachers choose seats.

References

Al-Homoud, M., & Tassinary, L. G. (2004). Social interactions at the neighborhood-level as a function of external space enclosure.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2008). Becoming friends by chance. Psychological Science, 19(5), 439–440.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baerveldt, C., Völker, B., & Van Rossem, R. (2008). Revisiting selection and influence: An inquiry into the friendship networks of high school students and their association with delinquency. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 50(5), 559–587.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baker, S., Mayer, A., & Puller, S. L. (2011). Do more diverse environments increase the diversity of subsequent interaction? Evidence from random dorm assignment. Economics Letters, 110(2), 110–112.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ball, B., & Newman, M. E. J. (2013). Friendship networks and social status. Network Science, 1(1), 16–30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boisjoly, J., Duncan, G. J., Kremer, M., Levy, D. M., & Eccles, J. (2006). Empathy or antipathy? The impact of diversity. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1890–1905.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Broekel, T., & Bednarz, M. (2018, September). Disentangling link formation and dissolution in spatial networks: An application of a two-mode STERGM to a project-based RD network in the German biotechnology industry. Networks and Spatial Economics, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-018-9430-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Byrne, D. (1961). The influence of propinquity and opportunities for interaction on classroom relationships. Human Relations, 14(1), 63–69.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Byrne, D., & Buehler, J. A. (1955). A note on the influence of propinquity upon acquaintanceships. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(1), 147.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Camargo, B., Stinebrickner, R., & Stinebrickner, T. (2010). Interracial friendships in college. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(4), 861–892.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carrell, S. E., Hoekstra, M., & West, J. E. (2019). The impact of college diversity on behavior toward minorities. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Conti, N., & Doreian, P. (2010). Social network engineering and race in a police academy: A longitudinal analysis. Social Networks, 32, 30–43.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Corno, L., Ferrara, E. L., & Burns, J. (2019, January). Interaction, stereotypes and performance. Evidence from South Africa [IFS Working Papers W19/03]. Institute for Fiscal Studies. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ifs/ifsewp/19-03.html.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Currarini, S., Jackson, M. O., & Pin, P. (2010). Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(11), 4857–4861.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Davel, C. (2013). Social networking: A psycho-educational analysis of online adolescent friendships [PhD thesis, University of South Africa].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Değirmencioğlu, S. M., Urberg, K. A., Tolson, J. M., & Richard, P. (1998). Adolescent friendship networks: Continuity and change over the school year. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1982, 313–337.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eagle, N., Alex ’Sandy’ Pentland, and Lazer, D. (2009). Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15274–15278.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ, 337, a2338.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frank, K. A., Chandra, M., & Mueller, A. S. (2013). The embeddedness of adolescent friendship nominations: The formation of social capital in emergent network structures. American Journal of Sociology, 119(1), 216–253.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gao, N., Rahaman, M. S., Shao, W., Ji, K., & Salim, F. D. (2022, September). Individual and group-wise classroom seating experience: effects on student engagement in different courses. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3550335.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hallinan, M. T., & Smith, S. S. (1989). Classroom characteristics and student friendship cliques. Social Forces, 67, 898–919.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hamm, J., & Hoffman, A. (2022, April). Can teachers affect friendships? In Peer Relationships in Classroom Management (pp. 61–76). Routledge. ISBN: 9781003148647. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003148647-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hipp, J. R., Corcoran, J., Wickes, R., & Li, T. (2014, January). Examining the social porosity of environmental features on neighborhood sociability and attachment. PloS One, 9, e84544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084544.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hogg, M. A., & Tindale, R. S. (2001). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes. Blackwell Publishers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427–436. Retrieved August 2, 2023, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2777857.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keller, T., & Takács, K. (2019). Peers that count: The influence of deskmates on test scores. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 62, 100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2019.05.003. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562418300283.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klärner, A., Keim, S., & von der Lippe, H. (2016). Social network dynamics in the course of family formation: Results from a mixed-methods longitudinal study. International Review of Social Research, 6(4).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krivitsky, P. N., & Handcock, M. S. (2013, March). A separable model for dynamic networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 76(1), 29–46. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12014. https://doi.org/10.1111%5C%2Frssb.12014.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lam, T. C. J. (2023). The influence of communication applications on the formation and sustainability of intercultural friendships. European Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 1–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lane, J. (2016). The digital street: An ethnographic study of networked street life in Harlem. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215601711.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Latané, B., Liu, J. H., Nowak, A., Bonevento, M., & Zheng, L. (1995, August). Distance matters: Physical space and social impact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295218002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu, M., & Chen, X. (2003). Friendship networks and social, school and psychological adjustment in Chinese junior high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 40(1), 5–17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maejima, N. (2020). Comparing gender homophily among the multilayer media social networks of face-to-face, instant messenger and social networking services: A case study of a high school classroom. Connections, 40(1), 77–97.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McFarland, D. A. (2001). Student resistance: How the formal and informal organization of classrooms facilitate everyday forms of student defiance. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 612–678. https://doi.org/10.1086/338779.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McFarland, D. A., Moody, J., Diehl, D., Smith, J. A., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). Network ecology and adolescent social structure. American Sociological Review, 79(6). 1088–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414554001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Minchen, B. J. (2007). The effects of classroom seating on students’ performance in a high school science setting [PhD thesis]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/5615.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moody, J. (2001). Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 679–716. https://doi.org/10.1086/338954.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nahemow, L., & Lawton, M. P. (1975). Similarity and propinquity in friendship formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 205–213.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Radó, M., & Takacs, K. (2019, January). Relational integration in schools through seating assignments. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 22. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4115.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rohrer, J. M., Keller, T., & Elwert, F. (2020, December). Proximity can induce diverse friendships: A large randomized classroom experiment. CERS-IE Working Papers 2053. Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies. https://ideas.repec.org/p/has/discpr/2053.html.
RohrerJ. M. KellerT. ElwertF. 2020 December Proximity can induce diverse friendships: A large randomized classroom experiment CERS-IE Working Papers 2053 Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies https://ideas.repec.org/p/has/discpr/2053.html

Back to article
Segal, M. W. (1974). Alphabet and attraction: An unobtrusive measure of the effect of propinquity in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 654–657.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Small, M. L., & Adler, L. (2019). The role of space in the formation of social ties. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022707.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, J., & Moody, J. (2013). Structural effects of network sampling coverage I: Nodes missing at random. Social Networks, 35(4), 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.09.003. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873313000786.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Snijders, T. A. B (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31(1), 361–395.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., & Wellman, B. (2012). Geography of Twitter networks. Social Networks, 34(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.006. [Capturing Context: Integrating Spatial and Social Network Analyses. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873311000359].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van den Berg, Y. H. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015). Peer status and classroom seating arrangements: A social relations analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 19–34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van den Berg, Y. H. M., Segers, E., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012). Changing peer perceptions and victimization through classroom arrangements: A field experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 403–412.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Laar, C., Levin, S., Sinclair, S., & Sidanius, J. (2005). The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 329–345.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wasnock, D. P. (2010). Classroom environment: Emphasis on seating arrangement. St. John Fisher College. https://books.google.com/books?id=ko6JnQAACAAJ.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weinstein, C. S. (1979). The physical environment of the school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49(4), 577–610. Retrieved January 31, 2023, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1169986.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wölfer, R., Faber, N. S., & Hewstone, M. (2015). Social network analysis in the science of groups: Cross-sectional and longitudinal applications for studying intra-and intergroup behavior. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(1), 45.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wulf, K. (1976). Relationship of assigned classroom seating area to achievement variables. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1976.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Role of Classroom Seating Arrangements in Friendship Formation and Persistence

Abstract

Paradigm

My account