Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What the eye does not see: visualizations strategies for the data collection of personal networks Cover

What the eye does not see: visualizations strategies for the data collection of personal networks

Open Access
|May 2019

References

  1. Agneessens, F., Waege, H. and Lievens, J.. 2002. Social support typologies: different approaches for reducing social support data. Developments in Social Science Methodology 18: 73–73.
  2. Antonucci, T.. 1986. Hierarchical mapping technique: Measuring social support networks. Generations 10 4: 10–12.
  3. Barrera, M.. 1980. A method for the assessment of social support networks in community survey research. Connections 3 3: 8–13.
  4. Bastian, M., Heymann, S. and Jacomy, M.. 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. paper presented at the International Conference on Web and Social Media, available at: https://gephi.org/publications/gephi-bastian-feb09.pdf San Jose, California, May 17–20, 2009. Published by The AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California.
  5. Bidart, C. and Charbonneau, J.. 2011. How to generate personal networks: issues and tools for a sociological perspective. Field Methods 23 3: 266–286.
  6. Brands, R. A. and Mehra, A.. 2019. Gender, brokerage, and performance: a construal approach. Academy of Management Journal 62 1: 196–219.
  7. Burt, R. S.. 1984. Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks 6 4: 293–339.
  8. Cachia, R. and Maya Jariego, I.. 2010. Eliciting communities from personal network visualisations: ties, groups and communities . paper presented at International Network for Social Network Analysis: Sunbelt XXX., Trento.
  9. Cachia, R. and Maya-Jariego, I.. 2018. Mobility types, transnational ties and personal networks in four highly skilled immigrant communities in Seville (Spain). Social Networks 53: 111–124.
  10. Carrasco, J. A., Hogan, B., Wellman, B. and Miller, E. J.. 2006. Collecting social network data to study social activity-travel behaviour: an egocentric approach. paper presented at the 85th Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC.
  11. Cheong, L., Armour, C. and Bosnic-Anticevich, S.. 2013. Primary health care teams and the patient perspective: a social network analysis. Research in social and administrative pharmacy 9 6: 741–757.
  12. den Besten, O.. 2010. Local belonging and ‘geographies of emotions’: immigrant children’s experience of their neighbourhoods in Paris and Berlin. Childhood 17 2: 181–195.
  13. Domínguez, S. and Maya-Jariego, I.. 2008. Acculturation of Host Individuals: Immigrants and Personal Networks. American Journal of Community Psychology 42 3: 309–327.
  14. Dunbar, R. I. M. and Spoors, M.. 1995. Social networks, support cliques, and kinship. Human Nature 6 3: 273–290.
  15. Eddens, K. and Fagan, J. M.. 2018. Comparing nascent approaches for gathering alter-tie data for egocentric studies. Social Networks 55: 130–141.
  16. Eddens, K., Fagan, J. M. and Collins, T.. 2017. An interactive, mobile-based tool for personal social network data collection and visualization among a geographically isolated and socioeconomically disadvantaged population: early-stage feasibility study with qualitative user feedback. JMIR Research Protocols 6 6: e124.
  17. Fischer, C. S.. 1982), To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks In Town And City, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  18. Freeman, L. C.. 2000. Visualizing social networks. Journal of Social Structure 1 1.
  19. Freeman, L. C.. 2004. The Development of Social Network Analysis. A Study in the Sociology of Science. Empirical Press, Vancouver, BC.
  20. Fu, Y. C.. 2005. Measuring personal networks with daily contacts: a single-item survey question and the contact diary. Social Networks 27 3: 169–186.
  21. Gamper, M., Schönhuth, M. and Kronenwett, M.. 2012. Bringing qualitative and quantitative data together: collecting network data with the help of the software tool VennMaker. in Safar, M. and Mahdi, K.. (Eds), Social Networking and Community Behavior Modeling: Qualitative and Quantitative Measures, Hershley, PA: 193–213 Bielefeld (Germany).
  22. Hersberger, J.. 2003. A qualitative approach to examining information transfer via social networks among homeless populations. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research 4(1): 95–108.
  23. Hogan, B., Carrasco, J. A. and Wellman, B.. 2007. Visualizing personal networks: working with participant-aided sociograms. Field Methods 19 2: 116–144.
  24. Kahn, R. L. and Antonucci, T.. 1984. Supports of the elderly: family/friends/professionals. Final report to the National Institute on Aging Bethesda, MD.
  25. Killworth, P. D., Johnsen, E. C., Bernard, H. R., Ann Shelley, G. and McCarty, C.. 1990. Estimating the size of personal networks. Social Networks 12 4: 289–312.
  26. Lubbers, M. J., Molina, J. L. and McCarty, C.. 2007. Personal networks and ethnic identifications. International Sociology 22 6: 721–741.
  27. McCallister, L. and Fischer, C. S.. 1978. A procedure for surveying personal networks. Sociological Methods & Research 7 2: 131–148.
  28. McCarty, C.. 2002. Structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure 3 1.
  29. McCarty, C. and Govindaramanujam, S.. 2005. A modified elicitation of personal networks using dynamic visualization. Connections 26(2): 61–69.
  30. McCarty, C., Killworth, P. D., Bernard, R., Johnsen, E. C. and Shelley, G. A.. 2001. Comparing two methods for estimating network size. Human Organization 20 1: 28–39.
  31. McCarty, C., Molina, J. L., Aguilar, C., Rota, L.. 2007. A comparison of social network mapping and personal network visualization. Field Methods 19 2: 145–162.
  32. Marin, A.. 2004. Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics? Implications for name generator data. Social Networks 26 4: 289–307.
  33. Marin, A. and Hampton, K. N.. 2007. Simplifying the personal network name generator. Field Methods 19 2: 163–193.
  34. Maya Jariego, I. and Holgado, D.. 2005. Lazos fuertes y proveedores múltiples de apoyo: comparación de dos formas de representación gráfica de las redes personales. Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales 10: 107–127.
  35. Maya-Jariego, I.. 2016. 7 usos del análisis de redes en la intervención comunitaria. REDES. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales 27 2: 1–10.
  36. Maya-Jariego, I.. 2018. Why name generators with a fixed number of alters may be a pragmatic option for personal network analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology 62 1–2: 233–238.
  37. Maya-Jariego, I., & Armitage, N.. 2007. Multiple senses of community in migration and commuting: The interplay between time, space and relations. International Sociology 22 6: 743–766.
  38. Maya-Jariego, I.. 2004. Sentido de comunidad y potenciación comunitaria. Apuntes de Psicología 22 2: 187–211.
  39. Brass, D., Labianca, G., Mehra, A., Halgin, D., Borgatti, S. P.. 2014. Imaginary worlds: using visual network scales to capture perceptions of social networks. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks, Emerald Group Publishing: 315–336. Bradford (United Kingdom).
  40. Milardo, R. M.. 1992. Comparative methods for delineating social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 9 3: 447–461.
  41. Moreno, J. L.. 1934. Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Nervous and Mental Disease Monograph Series No 58, Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing, Washington, DC.
  42. Moreno, J. L.. 1953. Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and socio-drama, 2nd ed., Beacon House, Oxford.
  43. Pearce, J. and Milne, E. J.. 2010. Participation and community on Bradford’s traditionally white estates: a community research project. available at: http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/Bradford-participation-community-full.pdf. Retrieved: December 21, 2018.
  44. Pool, I. S. and Kochen, M.. 1978. Contacts and influence. Social Networks 1 1: 5–51.
  45. Ratti, C., Frenchman, D., Pulselli, R. M., and Williams, S. 2006. Mobile landscapes: using location data from cell phones for urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33 5: 727–748.
  46. Reyes, C.. 2016. Eliciting data on social relationships: the use of hand-drawn network maps in tracing the perception of digitally mediated social ties. International Review of Social Research 6 4: 256–268.
  47. Roberts, S. G. B., Dunbar, R. I. M., Pollet, T. V. and Kuppens, T.. 2009. Exploring variation in active network size: constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks 31 2: 138–146.
  48. Roberts, S. G. B., Wilson, R., Fedurek, P. and Dunbar, R. I. M.. 2008. Individual differences and personal social network size and structure. Personality and Individual Differences 44 4: 954–964.
  49. Ryan, L. and D’Angelo, A.. 2018. Changing times: migrants’ social network analysis and the challenges of longitudinal research. Social Networks 53: 148–158.
  50. Ryan, L., Mulholland, J. and Agoston, A.. 2014. Talking ties: reflecting on network visualisation and qualitative interviewing. Sociological Research Online 19 2, available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/19/2/16.html. Retrieved: December 21, 2018..
  51. Samuelsson, M., Thernlund, G. and Ringstrom, J.. 1996. Using the five field map to describe the social network of children: a methodological study. International Journal of Behavioral Development 19 2: 327–346.
  52. Schiffer, E. and Hauck, J.. 2010. Net-map: collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods 22 3: 231–249.
  53. Schönhuth, M., Kronenwett, M., Gamper, M. and Stark, M.. 2012. Vennmaker 1.5. available at http://www.vennmaker.com Retrieved: December 21, 2018..
  54. Tubaro, P., Casilli, A. A. and Mounier, L.. 2014. Eliciting personal network data in web surveys through participant-generated sociograms. Field Methods 26 2: 107–125.
  55. van der Poel, M. G. M.. 1993. Delineating personal support networks. Social Networks 15 1: 49–70.
  56. Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Koren, G. and Hlebec, V.. 2008. Measuring ego-centered social networks on the web: questionnaire design issues. Social Networks 30 3: 213–222.
  57. von der Lippe, H., and Gamper, M.. 2017. rawing or tabulating ego-centered networks? A mixed-methods comparison of questionnaire vs. visualization-based data collection. Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 5: 425–441.
  58. Wellman, B.. 1979. The community question: the intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Community Psychology 84 5: 1201–1231.
  59. Wellman, B.. 2007. The network is personal: introduction to a special issue of Social networks. Social Networks 29 3: 349–356.
  60. Wellman, B. and Wortley, S.. 1990. Different strokes from different folks: community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology 96 3: 558–588.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2019-003 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 18
Submitted on: Jan 21, 2019
Published on: May 7, 2019
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Isidro Maya-Jariego, Romina Cachia, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.