Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Interlabial gap and freeway space at rest position: a cephalometric study Cover

Interlabial gap and freeway space at rest position: a cephalometric study

Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. The Academy of Prosthodontics. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:10–92.
  2. Garnick JJ, Ramfjord SP. Rest position: an electromyographic and clinical investigation. J Prosthet Dent 1962;12:895–911.
  3. Zachrisson BU. Esthetic factors involved in anterior tooth display and the smile: Vertical dimension. J Clin Orthod 1998;32:432–45.
  4. Zachrisson BU. Facial esthetics: guide to tooth positioning and maxillary incisor display. World J Orthod 2007;8:308–14.
  5. Yogosawa F. Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1991;60:177–90.
  6. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53:262–84.
  7. Burstone CJ. Part 1 facial esthetics. Interview by Ravindra Nanda. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:79–87.
  8. Dindaroglu F, Duran GS, Gorgulu S. Reproducibility of the lip position at rest: A 3-dimensional perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:757–65.
  9. Bergman RT, Waschak J, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Murphy NC. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years. Angle Orthod 2014;84:48–55.
  10. Ghorbanyjavadpour F, Rakhshan V. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;155:832–43.
  11. Thörne H. The rest position of the mandible and the path of closure from rest to occlusion position. Acta Odontol Scand 1953;11:141–7.
  12. Sverdlow H. Roentgencephalometric study of vertical dimension changes in immediate denture patients. J Prosthet Dent 1964;14:635–44.
  13. Miralles R, Dodds C, Palazzi C, Jaramillo C, Quezada V, Ormeno G. Vertical dimension. Part 1: comparision of clinical freeway space. CRANIO® 2001;19:230–6.
  14. Vinnakota DN, Kanneganti KC, Pulagam M, Karnati PK. Freeway space determination using lateral profile photographs: A pilot study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016;16:242–7.
  15. Potgieter PJ, Monteith BD, Kemp PL. The determination of freeway space in edentulous patients: a cephalometric approach. J Oral Rehabil 1983;10:283–93.
  16. Rugh JD, Drago CJ. Vertical dimension: a study of clinical rest position and jaw muscle activity. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:670–5.
  17. Michelotti A, Farella M, Vollaro S, Martina R. Mandibular rest position and electrical activity of the masticatory muscles. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:48–53.
  18. Haraguchi S, Takada K, Yasuda Y. Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity. Angle Orthod 2002;72:28–35.
  19. McGee GF. Use of facial measurements in determining vertical dimension. J Am Dent Assoc 1947;35:342–7.
  20. Tryde G, McMillan DR, Christensen J, Brill N. The fallacy of facial measurements of occlusal height in edentulous subjects. J Oral Rehabil 1976;3:353–8.
  21. Carossa S., Catapano S, Scotti R. The unreliability of facial measurements in the determination of the vertical dimension of occlusion in edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:287–90.
  22. Vig PS, Cohen AM. Vertical growth of the lips: a serial cephalometric study. Am J Orthod 1979;75:405–15.
  23. Iwahashi F, Yamaguchi K, Nokita T, Kouno R, Tamura H, Kawanabe N. Activity of the lips associated with simulated upper incisors position. Orthod Waves 2004;63:7–14.
  24. Leonardo SE, Sato Y, Kaneko T, Yamamoto T, Handa K, Lida J. Differences in dento-facial morphology in lip competence and lip incompetence. Orthod Waves 2009;68:12–9.
  25. Hassan AH, Trukistani AA, Hassan MH. Skeletal and dental characteristics of subjects with incompetent lips. Saudi Med J 2014;35:849–54.
  26. Lindegard B. Variations in human body build. Acta Psychol Neurol 1953;86:87.
  27. Peterson TM, Rugh JD, Mciver JE. Mandibular rest position in subjects with high and low mandibular plane angles. Am J Orthod 1983;83:318–20.
  28. Wessberg GA. Evaluation of mandibular rest position in subjects with diverse dentofacial morphology. Prosthet Dent 1982;48:451–60.
  29. Sakar O, Bural C, Sülün T, Öztaş E, Marşan G. Evaluation of the closest speaking space in different dental and skeletal occlusions. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:222–6.
  30. Bishara SE, Peterson LC, Bishara EC. Changes in facial dimensions and relationships between the ages of 5 and 25 years. Am J Orthod 1984;85:238–52.
  31. Bishara SE, Hession TJ, Peterson LC. Longitudinal soft-tissue profile changes: a study of three analyses. Am J Orthod 1985;88:209–23.
  32. Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:24–8.
  33. Dong JK, Jin TH, Cho HW, Oh SC. The esthetics of the smile: a review of some recent studies. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:9–19.
  34. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The gingival smile line. Angle Orthod 1992;62:91–100.
  35. Maulik C, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007;132:307–15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2021.027 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 237 - 250
Published on: Oct 12, 2021
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Ye-Ji Seo, Jae Hyun Park, Na-Young Chang, Hye Young Seo, Jong-Moon Chae, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.