Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Perception of dental midline deviation and smile attractiveness by eye-tracking and aesthetic ratings Cover

Perception of dental midline deviation and smile attractiveness by eye-tracking and aesthetic ratings

By: Sümeyye Aşik and  Hatice Kök  
Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. Janson G, Branco NC, Fernandes TMF, Sathler R, Garib D, Lauris JRP. Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2011;81:153–61.
  2. Sabri R. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod 2005;39:155–67.
  3. Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Heck GV, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Smile attractiveness: self-perception and influence on personality. Angle Orthod 2007;77:759–75.
  4. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Lagravere MO, Major PW. Layperson’s perception of smile aesthetics and facial views. J Orthod 2004;31:204–9.
  5. Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:343–50.
  6. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:141–51.
  7. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:748–53.
  8. Ioi H, Kang S, Shimomura T, Kim SS, Park SB, Son WS, et al. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese and Korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:459–65.
  9. Olivares A, Vicente A, Jacobo C, Molina SM, Rodrı´guez A, Bravo LA. Canting of the occlusal plane: perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:516–20.
  10. Al Taki A, Hamdan AM, Mustafa Z, Hassan M, Abu-Alhuda S. Smile esthetics: impact of variations in the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the maxillary lateral incisors. Eur J Dent 2017;11:514–20.
  11. Sriphadungporn C, Chamnannidiadha N. Perception of smile esthetics by laypeople of different ages. Prog Orthod 2017;18:8.
  12. Nomura S, Freitas KMS, Silva PPCD, Valarelli FP, Cançado RH, Freitas MRD. Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod 2018;23:47–57.
  13. Mollabashi V, Abolvardi M, Akhlaghian M, Ghaffari MI. Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types. Dent Med Probl 2018;55:305–12.
  14. Cavalcanti SM, Guerra SMG, Valentim FB, Rosetti EP. Esthetic perception of smiles with different gingival conditions. Gen Dent 2019;67:66–70.
  15. Kokich VO, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:311–24.
  16. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:515–23.
  17. Ferreira JB, Silva LED, Caetano MTDO, Motta AFJD, Cury-Saramago ADA, Mucha JN. Perception of midline deviations in smile esthetics by laypersons. Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21:51–7.
  18. Ong E, Brown RA, Richmond S. Peer assessment of dental attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;130:163–9.
  19. Abu Alhaija ES, Al-Shamsi NO, Al-Khateeb S. Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 2010;33:450–6.
  20. Chotimah C, Utomo SH, Purbiati M. Differences between male and female adolescents in the smile aesthetics perceptions regarding smile arc, gingival display, and buccal corridor. J Int Dent Med Res 2017;10:481–5.
  21. Thiruvenkatachari B, Javidi H, Griffiths SE, Shah AA, Sandler J. Extraction of maxillary canines: esthetic perceptions of patient smiles among dental professionals and laypeople. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:509–15.
  22. Duchowski AT. A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2002;34:455–70.
  23. Hickman L, Firestone A, Beck FM, Speer S. Eye fixations when viewing faces. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:40–6.
  24. Richards M, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone A, Walther D, Rosenstiel S. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:472–82.
  25. Johnson EK, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel SF. Role of facial attractiveness in patients with slight-to-borderline treatment need according to the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need as judged by eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:297–310.
  26. Baker RS, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel SF. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:523–33.
  27. Wang X, Cai B, Cao Y, Zhou C, Yang L, Runzhong L. Objective method for evaluating orthodontic treatment from the lay perspective: an eye tracking study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:601–10.
  28. Kim SH, Hwang S, Hong YJ, Kim JJ, Kim KH, Chung CJ. Visual attention during the evaluation of facial attractiveness is influenced by facial angles and smile. Angle Orthod 2018;88:329–37.
  29. Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson’s perspective: a computer-based survey study. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1318–27.
  30. Springer NC, Chang C, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel S, et al. Smile esthetics from the layperson’s perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:91–101.
  31. Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod 1998;4:146–52.
  32. Silva BP, Jimenez-Castellanos E, Martinez-de-Fuentes R, Greenberg JR, Chu S. Laypersons’ perception of facial and dental asymmetries. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2013;33:163–171.
  33. Williams RP, Rinchuse DJ, Zullo TG. Perceptions of midline deviations among different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:249–55.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2021.020 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 187 - 196
Published on: Oct 21, 2021
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Sümeyye Aşik, Hatice Kök, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.