Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Urban Planning Features of Naukogrady (Science Cities) – Centers of Innovative Activity: The Case of Pyatihatky Cover

Urban Planning Features of Naukogrady (Science Cities) – Centers of Innovative Activity: The Case of Pyatihatky

Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. Ashford, N. and Hall, P. (2018). Technology, Globalization, and Sustainable Development Transforming the Industrial State (London: Routledge), 804.
  2. Miller, J. C. (2007). The Geography of Technopoles: Computer and Electric Product Manufacturing by MSA (North Carolina: Greensboro), 16.
  3. Simmie J. (1994). Technopole Planning in Britain, France, Japan and the USA (Planning Practice & Research), 7–20.
  4. Castells, M., Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the World. The making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes (London, Routledge), 288.
  5. Gordon, R. (1990). Production systems, industrial networks and regions: transformations in the social and spatial organization of innovation (Revue d’économie industrielle); 304–339.
  6. Lavrov, A. The special features of the functioning of high-tech clusters in China and Japan https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-funktsionirovaniya-vysokotehnologichnyh-klasterov-vkitae-i-yaponii/viewer
  7. Siaomei, Ts. (2003). Creation of new industrial zones for the development of private entrepreneurship in China (St. Petersburg: Bulletin of St. Petersburg University), 65–69.
  8. Avdulov, A. N., & Kulkin F. M. (1992). The scientific and technological parks, technopolis and science regions: monograph ( he Russian Academy of Sciences: ISISS), 166.
  9. Rykov, K. N. (2012). The conditions for the architectural organization of technoparks contributing to creative intellectual work (Moskow: Vestnik MGSU 10), 37–44.
  10. Rumiantsev, A. A. (2005). Technopark – High Technology Space (Electronic Materials Architecton: University Izvestia) http://archvuz.ru/2005_2/3/
  11. Stupnytsky , V., Sribna, Y., & Stupnytsk , N. (2020). Technopolis as a point of growth of scientific and technical progress in the conditions of the newest world economy (Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid), 44–48.
  12. Mizrahi, M. (2013). What is Scientific Progress? Lessons from Scientific Practice (Journal of General Philosophy of Science) https://www.jstor.org/stable/42635447
  13. Khrustalev, D. A. (2011). The Architectural formation of research and production buildings of the innovation direction (Moskow: PhD Thesis), 25.
  14. Antonov, A. V. (2007). Principles of formation of architecture of buildings of innovative centers (Moskow: PhD Thesis), 24.
  15. Udovychenko, O. S. (2013). Innovative development of production territories of the city of Ukraine through the example of Kharkiv (International Scientific Journal Internauka) https://www.internauka.com/uploads/public/15106651549201.pdf
  16. Nekrasova, L. (2014). Features of formation of technopolys in historical cities of Ukraine (Kiev: Urban planning and territorial planning), 366–373.
  17. Mironenko, V. P., & Polivanova, M. V. (2014). Aspects of the formation of a technopark as a multifunctional complex (Vestnik of the Donbas National Academy of Construction and Architecture – Problems of Architecture and Urban Development) http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vdnaba_2014_2_26
  18. Nesvetaylov, G. A. (1995). Center-peripheral relations and transformation of post-Soviet science http://ecsocman.hse.ru/socis/msg/18907747.html
  19. Dergachov, V. (2002). Geoeconomics: Textbook for universities (Kiev – VIRA-R), 512.
  20. Agirrechu, A. (2002). The special features of the formation of the sciences of Russia (Smolensk: kumena The urbanization problems at the turn of centuries), 133–144. http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2005/0217/analit05.php
  21. Glazichev, V. L. (2008). Urbanism. Part 1. (Moskow: Europe), 155.
  22. Lappo, G. M., & Polyan, P. M. (2008). Russian science- ities: yesterday’s forbidden and half-missions – today’s growth points (The world of Russia), 20–49.
  23. Ashymshyn, V. P., & Stepyna, V. V. (2008). Creation of a scientific and production base of the Institute of Solid State Physics Materials Science and Technology (Kharkiv: Scientific and Production Journal Energy and electrification), 52–63.
  24. Antypenko H., Antonenko N., Didenko K. (2021). Urban Transformations of Kharkiv’s Large Housing Estates Novi Budynky and Pavlovo Pole After 1991 (Építés – Építészettudomány), (published online ahead of print 2021), accessed Oct 25, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1556/096.2021.00017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2022-002 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 28
Submitted on: Sep 7, 2021
Accepted on: Mar 1, 2022
Published on: Aug 6, 2022
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Lubov KACHEMTSEVA, Natalia KHOROIAN, Kateryna DIDENKO, Nadiia ANTONENKO, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.