References
- Elghazouli, A. Y., Castro, J. M., & Izzuddin, B. A. (2008). Seismic performance of composite moment-resisting frames. Engineering Structures, 30(7), 1802–1819.
- Ahmed, B., & Nethercot, D. A. (1997). Prediction of initial stiffness and available rotation capacity of major axis composite flush endplate connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 41(1), 31–60.
- Liew, J. R., Teo, T., Shanmugam, N., & Yu, C. (2000). Testing of steel–concrete composite connections and appraisal of results. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 56(2), 117–150.
- Da Silva, L. S., Simoes, R. D., & Cruz, P. J. (2001). Experimental behaviour of end-plate beam-to-column composite joints under monotonical loading. Engineering Structures, 23(11), 1383–1409.
- Liew, J. R., Teo, T., & Shanmugam, N. (2004). Composite joints subject to reversal of loading–Part 2: analytical assessments. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(2), 247–268.
- Liew, J. R., Teo, T., & Shanmugam, N. (2004). Composite joints subject to reversal of loading–Part 1: experimental study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(2), 221–246.
- Fu, F., & Lam, D. (2006). Experimental study on semi-rigid composite joints with steel beams and precast hollowcore slabs. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62(8), 771–782.
- Vasdravellis, G., Valente, M., & Castiglioni, C. A. (2009). Dynamic response of composite frames with different shear connection degree. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(10-11), 2050–2061.
- Piluso, V., Rizzano, G., & Tolone, I. (2012). An advanced mechanical model for composite connections under hogging/sagging moments. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 72(35–50).
- Barcewicz, W., & Gizejowski, M. A. (2013). Experimental tests of composite joints subjected to hogging and sagging bending moments. Paper presented at the: Proceedings of International Conference on Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete VII, North Queensland, Australia.
- Thai, H. T., Vo, T. P., Nguyen, T. K., & Pham, C. H. (2017). Explicit simulation of bolted endplate composite beam-to-CFST column connections. Thin-Walled Structures, 119(749–759).
- Aksoylar, N. D., Elnashai, A. S., & Mahmoud, H. (2011). The design and seismic performance of low-rise long-span frames with semi-rigid connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 67(1), 114–126.
- Sekulovic, M., & Nefovska-Danilovic, M. (2008). Contribution to transient analysis of inelastic steel frames with semi-rigid connections. Engineering Structures, 30(4), 976–989.
- Vellasco, P. D. S., De Andrade, S., Da Silva, J., De Lima, L., & Brito Jr, O. (2006). A parametric analysis of steel and composite portal frames with semi-rigid connections. Engineering Structures, 28(4), 543–556.
- Louzai, A., & Abed, A. (2015). Evaluation of the seismic behavior factor of reinforced concrete frame structures based on comparative analysis between non-linear static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(6), 1773–1793.
- Eurocode 4. (2001) Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach.
- l’Urbanisme, M. d. l. H. e. d. (2003). Règles Parasismiques Algériennes RPA 99/Version 2003 (Algerian Seismic Rules RPA 99 / Version 2003). In M. d. l. H. e. d. l’Urbanisme (Ed.), (Edition CGS ed.).
- Applied Technology Council, ATC-19 (1995) Structural response modification factors, Redwood City, California.
- Titoum, M., Tehami, M., & Achour, B. (2009). Effects of partial shear connection on the behavior of semi-continuous composite beams. International Journal of Steel Structures, 9(4), 301–313.
- (AFNOR), A. F. d. N. (2002). Eurocode 3 «Calcul des structures en acier» et Document d’Application Nationale-Partie 1-1: Règles générales et règles pour les bâtiments (Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures–Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings).
- Rajendran, S., & Kumar, S. (2017). Design of semi-rigid steel-concrete composite frames for seismic performance. J Struct Eng (SERC, Madras) 44 (136–147).
- Anderson, D., Aribert, J. M., Bode, H., & Kronenburger, H. J. (2000). Design rotation capacity of composite joints. Struct. Eng, 78(25–29).
- Hensman, J., & Nethercot, D. (2001). Numerical study of unbraced composite frames: generation of data to validate use of the wind moment method of design. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 57(7), 791–809.
- Standard, B. (2004). Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part I: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.
- Newmark, N. M., & Hall, W. J. (1982). Earthquake spectra and design (C. E. E. R. I. Berkeley Ed. First Edition ed.).
- Mwafy, A., & Elnashai, A. S. (2001). Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Engineering Structures, 23(5), 407–424.
- Monavari, B., & Massumi, A. (2012). Estimating displacement demand in reinforced concrete frames using some failure criteria. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 4(1), 4.
- Balendra, T., & Huang, X. (2003). Overstrength and ductility factors for steel frames designed according to BS 5950. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(8), 1019–1035.
- FEMA-356 : Prestandard and commentary for the Seismic rehabilitation of Buildings (2000).
- SAP2000 (2009) Three dimensional static and dynamic finite element analysis and design of structures V14. Computers and Structures Inc, Berkeley, California.
- Thermou, G., Elnashai, A. S., Plumier, A., & Doneux, C. (2004). Seismic design and performance of composite frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(1), 31–57.