Relationship Between the Concentrations Of PM2.5 Indoors Obtained by Using the Optical and Gravimetric Methods: Preliminary Analysis

PASTUSZKA, Jozef S.

doi:10.21307/acee-2020-035

Abstract

The paper presents preliminary analysis of measurements of the mass concentrations of PM_2.5 in the indoor environment, obtained with the use of two optical instruments: (Grimm device and low-cost sensor) and a sampler based on the gravimetric method (SKC). It was found that the measurement of PM_2.5 using an optical device with active sampling underestimates the actual mass concentration of this mode (PM_2.5), while measurement using an optical device with passive sampling of air overestimates the concentration of PM_2.5. It has been shown that the physical relationship between the mass concentrations of airborne particles obtained with an optical sensor (C_sensor ) and concentrations obtained with the gravimetric method (C_grav ) is not linear. However, for practical reasons, the correct (“true”) concentration levels of PM_2.5 in an indoor environment can be estimated by converting sensor data according to a simple linear equation, i.e., C_grav = a C_sensor . The coefficient a for the sensor used was estimated at 0.45.

References

Rogula-Kozłowska W., Pastuszka J.S., & Talik E. (2008). Influence of vehicular traffic on concentration and particle surface composition of PM10 and PM2.5 in Zabrze, Poland. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 17, 539–548.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holstius, D.M., Pillarisetti, A., Smith, K.R., & Seto, E. (2014). Field calibrations of a low-cost aerosol sensor at a regulatory monitoring site in California. Atmospheric Measurement Technology, 7, 1121–1131.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Feenstra, B., Papastolou, V., Hasheminassab, S., Zhang, H., Der Boghossian, B., Cocker, D., & Polidori, A. (2019). Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site. Atmospheric Environment, 216, 116946, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116946.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yoo, E.H., Zammit-Mangion, A., & Chipeta, M.G. (2020). Adaptive spatial sampling design for environmental field prediction using low-cost sensing technologies. Atmospheric Environment, 221, 117092, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.117091
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cavaliere, A., Carotenuto, F., Di Gennaro, F., Gioli, B., Gualtieri G., Martelli, F., Matese, A., Toscano, P., Vagnoli, C., & Zaldei, A. (2018). Development of low-cost air quality stations for next generation monitoring networks: Calibration and validation of PM2.5 and PM10 sensors. Sensors, 18, 2843, https://doi:10.3390/s18092843.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Castell, N., Dauge, F.R., Schneider, P., Vogt, M., Lerner, U., Fischbain, A., Broday, D., & Bartnova, A. (2017). Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? Environment International, 99, 293–302.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jayaratne, R., Liu, X., Ahn, K-H., Asumadu-Sakyi, A., Fisher, G., Gao, J., Mabon A., Mazaheri, M., Mullins, B., Nyaku, M., Ristowski, Z., Scorgie, Y., Thai, P., Dunbabin, M., & Morawska L. (2020). Low-cost PM2.5 sensors: an assessment of their suitability for various applications. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 20, 520–532.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pastuszka, J.S., Wawroś, A., Talik, E., & Paw U, K.T. (2003). Optical and chemical characteristics of the atmospheric aerosol in four towns in southern Poland. The Science of the Total Environment 309, 237–251.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wawroś, A., Talik, E., Żelechower, M., Pastuszka, J.S., Skrzypek, D., & Ujma, Z. (2003). Seasonal variation in the chemical composition and morphology of aerosol particles in the centre of Katowice, Poland. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 12, 619–627.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pastuszka, J., Hławiczka, S., & Willeke, K. (1993). Particulate pollution levels in Katowice, a highly industrialized Polish city. Atmospheric Environment, 27B, 59–65.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wawroś, A., Talik, E., & Pastuszka, J.S. (2003). Investigation of winter atmospheric aerosol particles in downtown Katowice using XPS and SEM. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 9, 349–358.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pastuszka, J.S., & Okada, K. (1995). Features of atmospheric aerosol particles in Katowice, Poland. The Science of the Total Environment, 175, 179–188.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, K. (2016). Atmospheric aerosol particles (In:) Synergic Influence of Gaseous, Particulate, and Biological Pollutants on Human Health. (Ed. J.S. Pastuszka). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 39–67.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pastuszka, J.S., Rogula-Kozłowska, W., Klejnowski, K., & Rogula-Kopiec, P. (2015). Optical properties of fine particulate matter in Upper Silesia, Poland. Atmosphere, 6, 1521–1538.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Utrecht (2017). https://www.samenmetenaanluchtkwaliteit.nl/minutes-intl-meeting-air-quality-sensors-13-2-2017
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lewis, A.C., Schneidemesser, E., & Peltier, R.E. (Eds.). (2018). Low-cost sensors for the measurement of atmospheric composition: overview of topic and future applications, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva 2, Switzerland.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Texas Instruments Incorporated (2016). PM2.5/PM10 Particle sensor analog front-end for air quality monitoring design. TI Report TIDUB65C.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnson, K.K., Bergin, M.H., Russel, A.G., & Hagler, G.S. (2016). Using low cost sensors to measure ambient particulate matter concentrations on on-road emission factors. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi/10.5194/amt-2015-331
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, Y., Li, J., Zhang, Q., Jiang, J., & Biswas, P. (2015). Laboratory evaluation and calibration of three low-cost particle sensors for particulate matter measurement. Aerosol Science and Technology, 49, 1063–1077.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kowalska, M., Mainka, A., & Mucha, W. (2019). The usefulness of an optical monitor for the assessment human exposure to fine dust in indoor air (in Polish). Medycyna Pracy, 70, 213–220. https//doi.org//10.130757/imp.5893.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mainka, A., Brągoszewska, E., Kozielska, B., Pastuszka, J.S., & Zajusz-Zubek, E. (2015). Indoor air quality in urban nursery schools in Gliwice, Poland: Analysis of the case study. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 6, 1098–1104.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rogula-Kopiec, P., Rogula-Kozłowska, W., Pastuszka, J.S., & Mathews, B. (2018). Air pollution of beauty salons by cosmetics from the analysis of suspended particulate matter. Environmental Chemistry Letters (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0798-4)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pastuszka, J.S., Górny, R.L., Lis, D. (1995) Migration of ambient aerosol into indoor environment in Upper Silesia, Poland. Journal of Aerosol Science, 26, Suppl. 1, 517–518.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pastuszka J.S., Cembrzyńska J., Orłowski C., Mucha W. (2018). Analiza możliwości monitorowania stężeń pyłu respirabilnego przy pomocy czujników optycznych (Possibility analysis of monitoring respirable dust concentrations with the use of optical sensors). Proc. Conf. Aktualne Problemy w Inżynierii i Ochronie Atmosfery (Eds. Kuropka J., Gaj K., Sówka I.) Politechnika Wrocławska, Wrocław Poland, 174–181.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cavaliere, A., Carotenuto, F., Di Gennaro, F., Gioli, B., Gualtieri G., Martelli, F., Matese, A., Toscano, P., Vagnoli, C., & Zaldei, A. (2018). Development of low-cost air quality stations for next generation monitoring networks: Calibration and validation of PM2.5 and PM10 sensors. Sensors, 18, 2843, https://doi:10.3390/s18092843.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu, H-Y., Schneider, P., Haugen, R., & Vogt, M. (2019). Performance assessment of a low-cost PM2.5 sensor for a near four-month period in Oslo, Norway. Atmosphere, 10, 41, doi:103390/atmos10020041.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Badura, M., Batog P., Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, A., & Modzel, P. (2018). Evaluation of low-cost sensors for ambient PM2.5 monitoring. Journal of Sensors, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5096540.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hinds, W.C. (1982). Aerosol Technology, John Wiley, New York.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van der Meulen, A., Plomp, A., Oesburg, F., Buringh, E., van Aalst, R.M., & Hoevers, W. (1980). Intercomparison of optical particle counters under conditions of normal operation. Atmospheric Environment, 14, 495–499.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gebhart, J. (1993). Optical direct-reading techniques: light intensity systems. (In:) Aerosol Measurements: Principles, Techniques and Applications (Eds.: K. Willeke and P. Baron), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, N.Y., 313–344.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnson, K.K., Bergin, M.H., Russel, A.G., & Hagler, G.S. (2018). Field test of several low-cost particulate matter sensors in high and low concentration urban environments. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 18, 565–578.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Manikonda, A., Ziková, N., Hopke, P.K., & Ferro, A.R. (2016). Laboratory assessment of low-cost PM monitors. Journal of Aerosol Science, 102, 29–40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jayaratne, R., Liu, X., Thai, P., Dunbabin, M., & Morawska, L. (2018). The influence of humidity on the performance of a low-cost air particle mass sensor and the effect of atmospheric fog. Atmospheric Measurement Technology, 11, 4883–4890.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Relationship Between the Concentrations Of PM2.5 Indoors Obtained by Using the Optical and Gravimetric Methods: Preliminary Analysis

Abstract

Paradigm

My account