Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
List of different variants of housing types taken into consideration in the experiment, together with the resulting values of urban ratios
| Housing type | J | B | B2 | S | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 |
| Single-family | 100% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | |||
| Semi-detached | 100% | 20% | 15% | 15% | 10% | 20% | |||
| Semi-detached with two apartments in each half | 100% | 10% | 15% | 15% | 20% | 10% | |||
| Terraced | 100% | 20% | 30% | 40% | 50% | 60% | |||
| Number of apartments [units] | 1,012 | 1,128 | 1,236 | 2,037 | 1,308 | 1,409 | 1,516 | 1,543 | 1,671 |
| Gross land use ratio [apartments/ha] | 10.12 | 11.28 | 12.36 | 20.37 | 13.08 | 14.09 | 15.16 | 15.43 | 16.71 |
| Gross land net land use [apartments/ha] | 16.36 | 17.95 | 19.66 | 32.65 | 20.98 | 22.44 | 24.21 | 24.68 | 26.68 |
| Housing Density [m2/ha] | 1,667 | 1,455 | 1,495 | 2,923 | 1,930 | 2,055 | 2,185 | 2,217 | 2,378 |
| Housing area [%] | 8.58 | 7.52 | 7.72 | 14.86 | 9.89 | 10.52 | 11.17 | 11.33 | 12.13 |
| Biologically active area [%] | 53.26 | 55.33 | 55.14 | 47.53 | 52.45 | 52.26 | 51.45 | 51.19 | 50.49 |
| Transportation area [%] | 38.16 | 37.15 | 37.14 | 37.61 | 37.66 | 37.22 | 37.38 | 37.48 | 37.38 |