Figure 1

Figure 2.

Figure 3.
![Scheme of Støvset Bridge and the increase of deflections during its operation [9]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64706f1783f1392090d69759/j_acee-2019-010_fig_003.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251206%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251206T212421Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=3993479dd761860bdd72372e60474a6a04325d7605fe244f7eaba65fb2d9bd61&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 4.
![Maximum deflections of the Støvset Bridge span as a function of time [9]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64706f1783f1392090d69759/j_acee-2019-010_fig_004.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251206%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251206T212421Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=61c57dee2139fb2f6ebd03139751d05c6fad90c9e6ec09cf0c443560b8b7f749&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Geometric characteristics of cantilever concreting bridges built in Poland
| No | Location | G [m] | ω [‰] | L [m] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grudziądz | 1174 | 0.848 | 180 |
| 2 | Płock - projekt | 1297 | 0.937 | 148.6* |
| 3 | Brzeg Dolny | 1189 | 0.859 | 140 |
| 4 | Kędzierzyn-Koźle | 1796 | 1.297 | 140 |
| 5 | Kraków | 1583 | 1.143 | 132 |
| 6 | Łany k. Wrocławia | 1187 | 0.857 | 120 |
| 7 | Milówka k. Wisły | 1059 | 0.765 | 82 |