Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of Envelope Structure on the Solutions of Thermal Insulation from the Inside Cover

Impact of Envelope Structure on the Solutions of Thermal Insulation from the Inside

Open Access
|Mar 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Prussian wall in the building of State Music School in Gliwice [11]

Figure 2.

Selected insulation methods from the inside for the Prussian wall [16] (1 – summer vapor diffusion flux, 2 – winter vapor diffusion flux, 3 – flux of slanting rain)

Figure 3.

Moistening with lashing rain and drying-out of the non-insulated Prussian wall

Figure 4.

Minimum requirements involving thermal insulation layer, depending on the thermal resistance of insulation for substrates characterized by different capillary activity [20]

Figure 5.

a) Making opencasts and collecting material for the wall from the room side; b) Measurement of surface humidity; c) Measurement of water absorbency of the wall

Figure 6.

Thermogram made from the outside of the building in Gliwice

Figure 7.

Total water content in the envelope (25 cm) insulated with lightweight cellular concrete (markings: 30–30 mm insulator; 60–60 mm insulator; 80–80 mm insulator)

Figure 8.

Changes of water content over time in a layer of the wooden frame stud in the wall insulated with lightweight cellular concrete (markings: 30–30 mm insulator; 60–60 mm insulator; 80–80 mm insulator)

Figure 9.

Changes of water content over time in a layer of the brickwork (25 cm) insulated with lightweight cellular concrete (markings: 30–30 mm insulator; 60–60 mm insulator; 80–80 mm insulator)

Figure 10.

Total water content in the envelope (25 cm) insulated with polyurethane panels (markings: 30–30 mm insulator; 60–60 mm insulator; 80–80 mm insulator)

Figure 11.

Changes of water content over time in a layer of the wooden frame stud in the wall with polyurethane panels (markings: 30–30 mm insulator; 60–60 mm insulator; 80–80 mm insulator)

Figure 12.

Changes of water content over time in a brickwork layer (25 cm) insulated with polyurethane panels (markings: 30–30 mm insulator; 60–60 mm insulator; 80–80 mm insulator)

Figure 13.

Changes of water content over time for a 12 cm-thick wall insulated with 8 cm-thick light cellular concrete

Figure 14.

Summary of calculation results for the corner of Prussian wall without thermal insulation (a, b – distribution of isotherms, c – distribution of heat flux density)

Figure 15.

Summary of calculation results for the corner of Prussian wall with 8cm-thick thermal insulation (a, b – distribution of isotherms, c – distribution of heat flux density)

Summarized data accepted for analysis

NoMaterial/LayerR.H. [-] μ[-] λ[W/m·K] ρ[kg/m3]
1Wood0.82000.13650
2Solid Brick; historical0.8150.601800
3Lightweight concrete0.840.04115
4Polyurethane plates0.8900.02244

Summary of results (*values calculated for the whole bridge (both branches)

Non-insulated wallInsulated wall (8 cm thick)
U [W/m2K)]1.570.34
Li 2D[W/m·K]* 4.42500.8673
Le 2D[W/m·K]* 4.42500.8673
ψi [W/m·K]* 0.3304-0.1846
ψiwall [W/m·K]0.1652-0.0923
ψe [W/m·K]* -0.50480.0465
ψewall [W/m·K]-0.27400.0233
fRsi [-]0.540.81
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2018-059 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 123 - 134
Submitted on: Jun 5, 2018
|
Accepted on: Oct 23, 2018
|
Published on: Mar 2, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Bożena ORLIK-KOŻDOŃ, Agnieszka SZYMANOWSKA-GWIŻDŻ, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.