Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Structural Health Monitoring System of a Concrete Cable-Stayed Bridge Cover

Structural Health Monitoring System of a Concrete Cable-Stayed Bridge

Open Access
|Mar 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

View of the Rędziński Bridge [www.golowersilesia.pl]
View of the Rędziński Bridge [www.golowersilesia.pl]

Figure 2.

General view of the Rędziński Bridge
General view of the Rędziński Bridge

Figure 3.

View of the Rędziński Bridge model in the SHM application. It shows a virtual location of each sensor [1]
View of the Rędziński Bridge model in the SHM application. It shows a virtual location of each sensor [1]

Figure 4.

Measuring scheme of the Rędziński Bridge [4]
Measuring scheme of the Rędziński Bridge [4]

Figure 5.

The monthly average forces in case of the longest stay-cables W40-PZ/F and W40-PW/F
The monthly average forces in case of the longest stay-cables W40-PZ/F and W40-PW/F

Figure 6.

The monthly average forces in case of the shortest stay-cables W1-LW/F and W1-LZ/F
The monthly average forces in case of the shortest stay-cables W1-LW/F and W1-LZ/F

Figure 7.

Change of the monthly average force in cables, in each row
Change of the monthly average force in cables, in each row

Figure 8.

Forces change between 3/04/2016 and 16/4/2016 in four random cable-stays – a diagram generated using the SHM application
Forces change between 3/04/2016 and 16/4/2016 in four random cable-stays – a diagram generated using the SHM application

Figure 9.

Sensors in the pylon’s cross-beam
Sensors in the pylon’s cross-beam

Figure 10.

Monthly average values of stress in concrete for the northern outside cross-beam surface
Monthly average values of stress in concrete for the northern outside cross-beam surface

Figure 11.

Monthly average values of stress in steel for the northern outside cross-beam surface
Monthly average values of stress in steel for the northern outside cross-beam surface

Figure 12.

The monthly average temperature in cables, deck and pylon
The monthly average temperature in cables, deck and pylon

Figure 13.

Two weeks temperature changes in the concrete deck sensors
Two weeks temperature changes in the concrete deck sensors

Figure 14.

Two weeks temperature changes in the pylon’s cross-beam (in concrete and in steel elements)
Two weeks temperature changes in the pylon’s cross-beam (in concrete and in steel elements)

Measured and allowed angular displacements

Sensor Minimum displacement Maximum displacement Maximum designed displacement
P0-L/Tt/Y-0.01°0.10°1.09°
P0-P/Tt/Y-0.01°0.05°1.09°
P17-L/Tt/Y-0.06°0.08°2.74°
P17-P/Tt/Y-0.06°0.08°2.74°
P30-L/Tt/X-0.09°0.09°0.85°
P30-L/Tt/Y-0.06°0.04°1.47°
P30-P/Tt/X-0.11°0.08°0.85°
P30-P/Tt/Y-0.12°0.12°1.47°

Extreme temperatures in each element

ElementMinimum temperature [°C] (February 2015)Maximum temperature [°C] (August 2015)
Cables-20.8944.37
Pylon-9.0536.03
Deck-12.7233.97

Comparison of average monthly forces

SensorAverage force, August 2011Average force, December 2015DifferencePercent change
[kN][kN][kN]
W1-LZ/F17841658-126-7.0%
W1-LW/F14331237-196-13.7%
W4-LZ/F31213007-114-3.6%
W4-LW/F30012921-80-2.7%
W6-LZ/F32902756-533-16.2%
W6-LW/F32293254240.8%
W8-LZ/F36693590-79-2.2%
W8-LW/F37713758-13-0.4%
W10-LZ/F457246751032.3%
W10-LW/F44824419-62-1.4%
W12-LZ/F4898490790.2%
W12-LW/F44414384-57-1.3%
W14-LZ/F57815580-200-3.5%
W14-LW/F54935362-131-2.4%
W16-LZ/F52624972-290-5.5%
W16-LW/F54285220-208-3.8%
W18-LZ/F52534932-322-6.1%
W18-LW/F50184681-337-6.7%
W20-LZ/F31352934-202-6.4%
W20-LW/F29662716-250-8.4%
SensorAverage force, August 2011Average force, December 2015DifferencePercent change
[kN][kN][kN]
W21-LZ/F17401528-212-12.2%
W21-LW/F13801185-196-14.2%
W24-LZ/F31113033-78-2.5%
W24-LW/F30252930-95-3.1%
W26-LZ/F33053206-99-3.0%
W26-LW/F32293006-223-6.9%
W28-LZ/F37143572-142-3.8%
W28-LW/F36703614-56-1.5%
W30-LZ/F47444658-86-1.8%
W30-LW/F45704438-132-2.9%
W32-LZ/F49184697-221-4.5%
W32-LW/F----
W34-LZ/F----
W34-LW/F57595448-310-5.4%
W36-LZ/F52635005-258-4.9%
W36-LW/F56145233-381-6.8%
W38-LZ/F52544832-421-8.0%
W38-LW/F52814928-353-6.7%
W40-LZ/F32022825-376-11.8%
W40-LW/F34483041-408-11.8%
SensorAverage force, August 2011Average force, December 2015DifferencePercent change
[kN][kN][kN]
W1-PZ/F-1524--
W1-PW/F-1304--
W4-PZ/F3051.33001-50.1-1.6%
W4-PW/F3069.32993-76.5-2.5%
W6-PZ/F3591.8362533.70.9%
W6-PW/F3253.13116-136.7-4.2%
W8-PZ/F3596.8364346.41.3%
W8-PW/F3550.4359544.81.3%
W10-PZ/F4794.7482327.80.6%
W10-PW/F4448.64368-81.1-1.8%
W12-PZ/F4869.14764-104.6-2.1%
W12-PW/F4722.23696-1026.7-21.7%
W14-PZ/F5579.0559920.20.4%
W14-PW/F5598.25455-143.5-2.6%
W16-PZ/F5183.54987-196.8-3.8%
W16-PW/F5374.65241-133.9-2.5%
W18-PZ/F5285.35022-263.5-5.0%
W18-PW/F5323.75072-251.5-4.7%
W20-PZ/F3199.62959-240.4-7.5%
W20-PW/F2952.42701-251.6-8.5%
SensorAverage force, August 2011Average force, December 2015DifferencePercent change
[kN][kN][kN]
W21-PZ/F12791064-215-16.8%
W21-PW/F14551266-189-13.0%
W24-PZ/F3088603-2485-80.5%
W24-PW/F30282954-74-2.4%
W26-PZ/F34583316-141-4.1%
W26-PW/F34263443170.5%
W28-PZ/F3610361990.2%
W28-PW/F36143679651.8%
W30-PZ/F453246411082.4%
W30-PW/F47454650-96-2.0%
W32-PZ/F90448933988441.0%
W32-PW/F49424849-93-1.9%
W34-PZ/F56645497-167-2.9%
W34-PW/F56685460-208-3.7%
W36-PZ/F54375172-265-4.9%
W36-PW/F53524726-626-11.7%
W38-PZ/F52204981-239-4.6%
W38-PW/F51344979-155-3.0%
W40-PZ/F30292718-312-10.3%
W40-PW/F33033010-293-8.9%
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2018-055 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 69 - 77
Submitted on: Jun 25, 2017
Accepted on: Oct 4, 2018
Published on: Mar 2, 2022
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Jan BILISZCZUK, Paweł HAWRYSZKÓW, Marco TEICHGRAEBER, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.