COLLABORATIVE HOUSING PERSPECTIVES IN POLAND. POTENTIAL, BARRIERS AND LEGAL POSSIBILITIES

TWARDOCH, Agata

doi:10.21307/acee-2017-051

Abstract

This paper is a continuation of the paper entitled “Collaborative Housing Perspectives in Poland. Definition, Historical Overview and Examples” and it describes the possibilities of implementation of collaborative housing in Polish conditions. In the paper, apart from legal constraints, the author also describes the benefits of collaborative housing, because as far as benefits of building homes in the construction group system, co-operative or co-housing seem to be quite well diagnosed for the inhabitants, the benefits for the city – which, based on the author’s studies, are huge – are not described well enough.

References

Bianchetti, C., Sampieri, A. (2014). Can shared practices build a new City? Journal of architecture and urbanism, 38(1), 73–79.10.3846/20297955.2014.895416
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] Coudroy de Lille, L., (2015). Housing cooperatives in Poland. The origins of a deadlock. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), bll, 17–31. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1753506 9.2015.1011424.
Back to article
Droste, C. (2015). German co-housing: an opportunity for municipalities to foster socially inclusive urban development? Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), bll, 79–92. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011428.10.1080/17535069.2015.1011428
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jarvis, H. (2015). Towards a deeper understanding of the social architecture of co-housing: evidence from the UK, USA and Australia. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), bll, 93–105.10.1080/17535069.2015.1011429
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaasa, A. (2016). Cohabitation: against the tabula rasa and towards a new ethic for cities Paper for the 2016 United Nations Habitat III conference on sustainable cities, this discussion paper commissioned by the “Charter of Quito” (https://www.academia.edu/28623660/Cohabitation_ Against_the_Tabula_Rasa_and_Towards_a_New_Et hic_for_Cities, acess 03.20117)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Labus, A. (2016). Senior cohousing in cross-cutting research. Architecture, Civil engineering, Environment, 9(4), 21–31.10.21307/acee-2016-049
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leviten-Reid C., Lake, A. (2016). Building Affordable Rental Housing for Seniors: Policy Insights From Canada. Journal of Housing For the Elderly, 30(3), bll,253–270. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02763893.2016.1198738 [Toegang verkry April 6, 2017].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ring, K. (2013). Selfmade City : Berlin : Stadtgestaltung und Wohnprojekte in Eigeninitiative, Berlin: Jovis.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ruiu, M. L. (2015). The Social Capital of Cohousing Communities. Sociology.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tornow, B., Skok H., Fedrowitz, M., (2015). Europe co-operative housing, Berlin: Jovis.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tummers, L. (2015). Understanding co-housing from a planning perspective: why and how? Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), bll, 64–78.10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sacała, S. (2014). Zwarte miasto Katowice. Typologia ubytków w tkance miejskiej na przykładzie śródmieś- cia Katowic wraz z modelowymi rozwiązaniami zabu- dowy uzupełniającej. MSc thesis under the supervision of dr inz. arch. Agata Twardoch, 2013/2014. The thesis was awarded a distinction by TUP [Polish Urban Planner Association] in the best graduation thesis competition.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

COLLABORATIVE HOUSING PERSPECTIVES IN POLAND. POTENTIAL, BARRIERS AND LEGAL POSSIBILITIES

Abstract

Paradigm

My account