Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The usefulness of spatial assessment of proximal femoral morphology in preoperative planning of cementless hip arthroplasty Cover

The usefulness of spatial assessment of proximal femoral morphology in preoperative planning of cementless hip arthroplasty

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Chaganti RK, Lane NE. Risk factors for incident osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2011;4(3):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s12178-011-9088-5.
  2. Lane NE, Lin P, Christiansen L, Gore LR, Williams EN, Hochberg MC, et al. Association of mild acetabular dysplasia with an increased risk of incident hip osteoarthritis in elderly white women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43(2):400-4. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200002)43:2<;400::AID-ANR21>3.0.CO;2-D.
  3. Reijman M, Hazes JM, Pols HA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Acetabular dysplasia predicts incident osteoarthritis of the hip: the Rotterdam study. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52(3):787-93. doi: 10.1002/art.20886.
  4. Gregory JS, Waarsing JH, Day J, Pols HA, Reijman M, Weinans H, et al. Early identification of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip using an active shape model to quantify changes in bone morphometric features: can hip shape tell us anything about the progression of osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 2007;56(11):3634-43. doi: 10.1002/art.22982.
  5. Lynch JA, Parimi N, Chaganti RK, Nevitt MC, Lane NE. The association of proximal femoral shape and incident radiographic hip OA in elderly women. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17(10):1313-8. doi: 10.1016/j. joca.2009.04.011.
  6. Kim YH, Kim JS, Park JW, Joo JH. Comparison of total hip replacement with and without cement in patients younger than 50 years of age: the results at 18 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93(4):449-55. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.26149.
  7. Busch V, Klarenbeek R, Slooff T, Schreurs BW, Gardeniers J. Cemented hip designs are a reasonable option in young patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(12):3214-20. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1355-z.
  8. Colombi A, Schena D, Castelli CC. Total hip arthroplasty planning. EFORT Open Rev 2019;4(11):626-32. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180075.
  9. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, Dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86(1):40-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200401000-00007.
  10. Zweymüller KA, Lintner FK, Semlitsch MF. Biologic fixation of a press-fit titanium hip joint endoprosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;(235):195-206.
  11. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;(235):148-65.
  12. Noble PC, Box GG, Kamaric E, Fink MJ, Alexander JW, Tullos HS. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;(316):31-44.
  13. Ferràs-Tarragó J, Sanchis-Alfonso V, Ramírez-Fuentes C, Roselló-Añón A, Baixauli-García F. A 3D-CT Analysis of femoral symmetry – surgical implications. J Clin Med 2020;9(11):3546. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113546.
  14. Dorr LD, Glousman R, Hoy AL, Vanis R, Chandler R. Treatment of femoral neck fractures with total hip replacement versus cemented and nonce-mented hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1986;1(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(86)80006-7.
  15. Mahaisavariya B, Sitthiseripratip K, Tongdee T, Bohez EL, Vander Sloten J, Oris P. Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering. Med Eng Phys 2002;24(9):617-22. doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(02)00113-3.
  16. Husmann O, Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, de Roguin B, Argenson JN. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 1997;12(4):444-50. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90201-1.
  17. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 1993;14(3):231-42. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2.
  18. Yeung Y, Chiu KY, Yau WP, Tang WM, Cheung WY, Ng TP. Assessment of the proximal femoral morphology using plain radiograph – can it predict the bone quality? J Arthroplasty 2006;21(4):508-13. doi: 10.1016/j. arth.2005.04.037.
  19. Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(5):500-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00774.
  20. Sariali E, Catonne Y, Pascal-Moussellard H. Three-dimensional planning-guided total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive direct anterior approach. Clinical outcomes at five years’ follow-up. Int Orthop 2017;41(4):699-705. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3242-z.
  21. Mainard D, Barbier O, Knafo Y, Belleville R, Mainard-Simard L, Gross JB. Accuracy and reproducibility of preoperative three-dimensional planning for total hip arthroplasty using biplanar low-dose radiographs: A pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017;103(4):531-6. doi: 10.1016/j. otsr.2017.03.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21164/pomjlifesci.1198 | Journal eISSN: 2719-6313 | Journal ISSN: 2450-4637
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 16
Published on: Mar 3, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Katarzyna Chamier-Ciemińska, Łukasz Kołodziej, Zbigniew Celewicz, Wojciech Poncyljusz, published by Pomeranian Medical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.