Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What Research Can DO: Rethinking Qualitative Research Designs to Promote Change Towards Equity and Inclusion Cover

What Research Can DO: Rethinking Qualitative Research Designs to Promote Change Towards Equity and Inclusion

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Alajami, A. (2020). Beyond originality in scientific research: Considering relations among originality, novelty, and ecological thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100723
  2. Alperin, J. P., Muños Nieves, C., Schimanski, L. A., Fischman, G. E., Niles, M. T., & McKiernan, E. C. (2019). How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion, and tenure documents? eLife, 8(44524). DOI: 10.7554/eLife.42254
  3. ASEE. (2020). Engineering and engineering technology by the numbers 2019. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Engineering-by-the-Numbers-FINAL-2021.pdf
  4. Benson, L., Bates, R. A., Jensen, K., Lichtenstein, G., Watts, K., Ko, E., & Albayati, B. (2021). Building research skills through being a peer reviewer. Paper presented at the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual conference. https://peer.asee.org/36769. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--36769
  5. Bix, A. S. (2002). Equipped for life: Gendered technical training and consumerism in home economics, 1920–1980. Technology and Culture, 43(4), 728754. DOI: 10.1353/tech.2002.0152
  6. Blackmon, D. A. (2009). Slavery by another name: The re-enslavement of black Americans from the Civil War to World War II. Anchor.
  7. Blosser, E. (2019). An examination of Black women’s experiences in undergraduate engineering on a primarily white campus: Considering institutional strategies for change. Journal of Engineering Education, March 2018, 5271. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20304
  8. Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 369375. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00367.x
  9. Beddoes, K. (2014). Using peer review to examine micropolitics and disciplinary development of engineering education: A case study. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(2), 266277. DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2012.745735
  10. Berhane, B., Secules, S., & Onuma, F. (2020). Learning while Black: Identity formation and experience for five Black men who transferred into engineering undergraduate programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 26(2), 93124. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020024994
  11. Catalano, G. D. (2006). Engineering in a morally deep world. In Engineering ethics: Race, justice, and the earth (pp. 3367). Morgan & Claypool. DOI: 10.2200/S00039ED1V01Y200606ETS001
  12. Catalano, G. D., Wray, P., & Cornelio, S. (2000). Compassion practicum: A capstone design experience at the United States Military Academy. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(4), 471474. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2000.tb00553.x
  13. Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 124. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2010.545065
  14. Chan Hilton, A. B., Morelock, J. R., Ingram, E. L., & Utschig, T. (2019). Connecting theory to practice: Four change projects in faculty development for engineering. Paper presented in the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL. https://peer.asee.org/32538. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32538
  15. Cohen, B. A. (2017). Point of View: How should novelty be valued in science? eLife, 6, e28699. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.28699
  16. Cross, J. E., Pickering, K., & Hickey, M. (2015). Community-based participatory research, ethics, and Institutional Review Boards: Untying a Gordian Knot. Critical Sociology, 41(7–8), 10071026. DOI: 10.1177/0896920513512696
  17. Dickerson, D. (2021). Personal communication.
  18. Dougherty, D. S., & Kramer, M. W. (2005). A rationale for scholarly examination of Institutional Review Boards: A case study. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33(3), 183188. DOI: 10.1080/00909880500149270
  19. Douglas, E. P. (2017). Beyond the interpretive: Finding meaning in qualitative data. Paper presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://strategy.asee.org/27658. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--27658
  20. Douglas, E. P., & Bumbaco, A. (2012). The stagnant pools of manuscript review. Paper presented at the International Congress for Qualitative Inquiry, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
  21. Eisenhart, M. A. (2009). Generalization from qualitative inquiry. In K. Erickan & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), Generalizing from educational research: Beyond qualitative and quantitative polarization (pp. 5166). Routledge.
  22. Faulkner, W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox. Engineering Studies, 1(3), 169189. DOI: 10.1080/19378620903225059
  23. Faulkner, W. (2014). Can women engineers be “real engineers” and “real women”? Gender in/authenticity in engineering. In W. Ernst & I. Horwath (Eds.), Gender in science and technology: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 187203). Transcript Verlag. DOI: 10.14361/transcript.9783839424346.187
  24. Froyd, J. E., Henderson, C., Cole, R. S., Friedrichsen, D., Khatri, R., & Stanford, C. (2017). From Dissemination to Propagation: A New Paradigm for Education Developers. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(4), 3542. DOI: 10.1080/00091383.2017.1357098
  25. Gendron, Y. (2008). Constituting the academic performer: The spectre of superficiality and stagnation in academia. European Accounting Review, 17(1), 97217. DOI: 10.1080/09638180701705973
  26. Génova, G., & de la Vara, J. L. (2018). The problem is not professional publishing, but the publish-or-perish culture. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 617619. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-0015-z
  27. Groen, C., McNair, L. D., Paretti, M. C., Simmons, D. R., & Shew, A. (2018, June). Exploring professional identity development in undergraduate civil engineering students who experience disabilities. Paper presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://peer.asee.org/30052
  28. Hammer, D., & Berland, L. (2013). Confusing claims for data: A critique of common practices for presenting qualitative research on learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 3746. DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2013.802652
  29. Hatmaker, D. M. (2013). Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(4), 382396. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x
  30. Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating Change in Undergraduate STEM Instructional Practices: An Analytic Review of the Literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952984. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20439
  31. Hug, S., Convertino, C., & Thiry, H. (2021, July). Continuous improvement for equity in engineering: Addressing departmental change with theory-informed case study research. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--36847
  32. Inclusive STEM Teaching Project (ISTP). (2022). Retrieved from https://www.inclusivestemteaching.org/
  33. Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2018). Thinking with theory: New analytic for qualitative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 717737). Sage.
  34. Jackson, J. K., Latimer, M., & Soiko, R. (2017). The dynamic between knowledge production and faculty evaluation: Perceptions of the promotion and tenure process across disciplines. Innovative Higher Education, 42, 193205. DOI: 10.1007/s10755-016-9378-3
  35. Jorgenson, J. (2002). Engineering selves: Negotiating gender and identity in technical work. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 350380. DOI: 10.1177/0893318902153002
  36. Kali, M. B., Secules, S., & McCall, C. J. (2021). Including Alice: Uncovering the narrative of one student’s experience at the intersection of international student status and mental health. Paper presented at the 2021 CoNECD Conference. https://peer.asee.org/36097
  37. Karlin, J. (2009). Sub-cultures as leverage for organisational learning and lean thinking. International Journal of Collaborative Enterprise, 1(2), 147159. DOI: 10.1504/IJCENT.2009.029286
  38. Kellam, N., & Jennings, M. (2022). Qualitative engineering education researchers and our relationships with data: Exploring our epistemologies and values as a community. Paper presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41088
  39. Koretsky, M., Magaña, A. J., & Shuman, L. J. (2016). Innovation through propagation: Using technology to enhance learning and propagation. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA. DOI: 10.18260/p.25711
  40. Kristensen, G. K., & Ravn, M. N. (2015). The voices heard and the voices silenced: Recruitment processes in qualitative interview studies. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 722737. DOI: 10.1177/1468794114567496
  41. Kukreti, A. R., & Wondimu Aure, T. (2015). Enhancing retention and academic success of undergraduate engineering students. Paper presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA. DOI: 10.18260/p.24000
  42. Laursen, S. L., & De Welde, K. (2019). The changer and the changed: Evolving theories and practices of change in ADVANCE calls for institutional transformation. Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion, 38(2), 140159. DOI: 10.1108/EDI-09-2017-0192
  43. London, J. S., & Borrego, M. (2017). Toward a shared meaning of the “impact” of engineering education research: Initial findings of a mixed methods study. Paper presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH. https://peer.asee.org/27953. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--27953
  44. Margherio, C., Doten-Snitker, K., Williams, J. M., Litzler, E., & Ingram, E. L. (2018). Forming strategic partnerships: New results from the revolutionizing engineering and computer science departments participatory action research. Paper presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--30532
  45. Marshall, P. A. (2003). Human subjects protections, Institutional Review Boards, and cultural anthropological research. Anthropological Quarterly, 76(2), 269285. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3318401. DOI: 10.1353/anq.2003.0028
  46. Martin, J. (2020). Time for a culture change: Moving academia from destructive to constructive feedback. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 26(1), vvii. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020033945
  47. Martin, J. P., Stefl, S. K., & Slaton, A. E. (2022). Learning in public and a path towards methodological activism: A conversation on equity research. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 28(1), 7587. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2021036574
  48. McCall, C., McNair, L. D., & Simmons, D. R. (2021). Advancing from outsider to insider: A grounded theory of professional identity negotiation in undergraduate engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(2), 393413. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20383
  49. McCall, C., Paretti, M. C., & Simmons, D. R. (2019, Oct). Designing inclusive research studies in engineering education. Presentation at the NSF Engineering Education and Centers Grantees Conference, Arlington, VA.
  50. McCall, C., Shew, A., Simmons, D. R., Paretti, M. C., & McNair, L. D. (2020). Exploring student disability and professional identity: Navigating sociocultural expectations in U.S. undergraduate civil engineering programs. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 7989. DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1720434
  51. McKiernan, E. C., Schimanski, L. A., Muños Nieves, C., Matthias, L., Niles, M. T., & Alperin, J. P. (2019). Use of the journal impact factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluation. eLife, 8(47338). DOI: 10.7554/eLife.47338
  52. McNeal, D. M., Glasgow, R. E., Brownson, R. C., Matlock, D. D., Peterson, P. N., Daugherty, S. L., & Knoepke, C. E. (2021). Perspectives of scientists on disseminating research findings to non-research audiences. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 5(1), E61. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2020.563
  53. Mejia, K. Z., & Turns, J. A. (2020). A look into the lived experiences of incorporating inclusive teaching practices in engineering education. Paper presented at the 2020 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Virtual conference. https://peer.asee.org/35067
  54. Morganson, V. J., Jones, M. P., & Major, D. A. (2010). Understanding women’s underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: The role of social coping. The Career Development Quarterly, 59(2), 169179. DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2010.tb00060.x
  55. Moriña, A. (2020). Faculty members who engage in inclusive pedagogy: Methodological and affective strategies for teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(3), 116. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1724938
  56. Moriña, A., Perera, V. H., & Carballo, R. (2020). Training needs of academics on inclusive education and disability. SAGE Open, 10(3). DOI: 10.1177/2158244020962758
  57. Nario-Redmond, M. R., Gospodinov, D., & Cobb, A. (2017). Crip for a day: The unintended negative consequences of disability simulations. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(3), 324333. DOI: 10.1037/rep0000127
  58. National Science Foundation. (1997). NSF to adopt new merit review criteria. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=102789
  59. National Science Foundation. (2014). Perspectives on Broader Impacts. Retrieved from https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/2022-09/Broader_Impacts_0.pdf
  60. National Science Foundation. (2019). IUSE/Professional Formation of Engineers: Revolutionizing engineering departments (IUSE/PFE: RED). Solicitation NSF 19-614. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2022/nsf22587/nsf22587.htm
  61. National Science Foundation. (2020). ADVANCE: Organizational Change for Gender Equity in STEM Academic Professionals. Solicitation NSF 20-554. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2020/nsf20554/nsf20554.htm
  62. National Science Foundation. (2022). Broader impacts. Retrieved from https://beta.nsf.gov/funding/learn/broader-impacts#what
  63. Pawley, A. L. (2008). What counts as “engineering”: Toward a redefinition. In D. Riley, A. L. Pawley, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Engineering and Social Justice (pp. 5985). Purdue University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/13464. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt6wq5pf.7
  64. Pawley, A. L. (2017). Shifting the “default”: The case for making diversity the expected condition for engineering education and making Whiteness and maleness visible. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 13. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20181
  65. Pawley, A. L. (2019). Learning from small numbers: Studying ruling relations that gender and race the structure of U.S. engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(1), 1331. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20247
  66. Reinholz, D. L., & Andrews, T. (2020). Change theory and theory of change: What’s the difference anyway? International Journal of STEM Education, 7(2). DOI: 10.1186/s40594-020-0202-3
  67. Reinholz, D. L., Corbo, J. C., Dancy, M., & Finkelstein, N. (2017). Departmental action teams: Supporting faculty learning through departmental change. Learning Communities Journal, 9(1), 532. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10181422
  68. Reinholz, D. L., White, I., & Andrews, T. (2021). Change theory in STEM higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(37). DOI: 10.1186/s40594-021-00291-2
  69. Riley, D., Slaton, A., & Pawley, A. (2014). Social justice and inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (eds.) Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 335356). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.022
  70. Rooney, S. I., Enszer, J. A., Maresca, J. A., Ismat Shah, S., Allister Hewlett, S., & Buckley, J. M. (2020). Faculty development mini-modules on evidence-based inclusive teaching and mentoring practices in engineering. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Virtual Conference. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--34660
  71. Secules, S. (2019). Making the familiar strange: An ethnographic scholarship of integration contextualizing engineering educational culture as masculine and competitive. Engineering Studies, 11(3), 196216. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2019.1663200
  72. Secules, S., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Tanu, E. (2018). Supporting the narrative agency of a marginalized engineering student. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(2), 186218. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20201
  73. Secules, S., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Turpen, C. (2018). Zooming out from the struggling individual student: An account of the cultural construction of engineering ability in an undergraduate programming class. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 5686. DOI: 10.18260/p.26239
  74. Secules, S., Kali, M. B., & McCall, C. (2022). Audio Dissemination for Qualitative and Broadening Participation Research: Lessons Learned and Future Possibilities. Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41086
  75. Secules, S., & Masta, S. (2020, October). Towards a framework for equity in engineering classrooms. Paper presented at the 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. DOI: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273991
  76. Secules, S., McCall, C., Mejia, J. A., Beebe, C., Masters, A. S., Sánchez-Peña, M. L., & Svyantek, M. (2021). Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 1943. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20377
  77. SEE. (2022). Become a reviewer. Studies in Engineering Education Journal. Retrieved from https://www.seejournal.org/author/register/reviewer/
  78. Sigahi, T. F. A., & Sznelwar, L. I. (2022). Exploring applications of complexity theory in engineering education research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 232260. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20438
  79. Simmons, D. (2012). First Generation College Students in Engineering: A Grounded Theory Study of Family Influence on Academic Decision Making. (Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University). https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/932
  80. Singer, J. B. (2019). Podcasting as social scholarship: A tool to increase the public impact of scholarship and research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 10(4), 571590. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/706600. DOI: 10.1086/706600
  81. Slaton, A., & Pawley, A. (2018). The power and politics of STEM research design: Saving the “small n”. Engineering Studies, 10(2–3), 133157. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2018.1550785
  82. Slaton, A. E. (2010). Race, rigor, and selectivity in US engineering: The history of an occupational color line. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674036192
  83. Smith, K. A., Linse, A., Turns, J., & Atman, C. (2004). Engineering change. Paper presented at the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://peer.asee.org/14102
  84. Stanford, C., Cole, R., Froyd, J., Henderson, C., Friedrichsen, D., & Khatri, R. (2017). Analysis of propagation plans in NSF-funded education development projects. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(4), 418437. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-017-9689-x
  85. Tierney, W. G., & Corwin, Z. B. (2007). The tensions between academic freedom and Institutional Review Boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 388398. DOI: 10.1177/1077800406297655
  86. Tonso, K. (2014). Engineering identity. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, (pp. 267282). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.019
  87. Villanueva, I., Mejia, J. A., & Revelo, R. A. (2018, October). Uncovering the hidden factors that could compromise equitable and effective engineering education. Paper presented at the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Jose, CA. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659294
  88. Weaver, K., & Spiers, J. (2018). Uplifting voices and images of research participants: issues in video dissemination. Nursing and Health, 6(1), 111. DOI: 10.13189/nh.2018.060101
  89. Zussman, R. (1985). Mechanics of the middle class: work and politics among American engineers. University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520314818/mechanics-of-the-middle-class. DOI: 10.1525/9780520314825
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.96 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 26 - 45
Submitted on: May 7, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 20, 2022
Published on: Mar 10, 2023
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Stephen Secules, Cassandra McCall, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.