Exploring Agency in Capstone Design Problem Framing
References
- Altshuller, G. (1996). And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving (2nd ed.). Technical Innovation Center, Inc.
- Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994).
Ethnography and participant observation . In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 1, 248–261. Sage Publications. - Atman, C. J., Yasuhara, K., Adams, R. S., Barker, T. J., Turns, J., & Rhone, E. (2008). Breadth in problem scoping: A comparison of freshman and senior engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 234–245.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robin_Adams/publication/233552110_Breadth_in_Problem_Scoping_a_Comparison_of_Freshman_and_Senior_Engineering_Students/links/53eab52b0cf2fb1b9b6ac998/Breadth-in-Problem-Scoping-a-Comparison-of-Freshman-and-Senior-Engineering-Students.pdf . - Barlow, A. J., & Brown, S. (2020). Discovering upper-division students’ cognitive engagement across engineering courses—An interpretive phenomenological analysis approach. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(1), 58–73. DOI: 10.21061/see.5
- Barr, R., Pandy, M. G., Petrosino, A. J., & Svihla, V. (2005, October 19–22). Challenge-based instruction in an engineering technical elective course. Proceedings of ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
http://aseegsw.com/past%20Proceedings/T4A3-Barr.pdf - Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426–432. DOI: 10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
- Bratman, M. E. (2013). Shared agency: A planning theory of acting together. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199897933.001.0001
- Bucciarelli, L. (1999). Delta design: Seeing/seeing as. Proceedings 4th Design Thinking Research Symposium on Design Representation, 1–7.
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/46334 - Christiaans, H., & Almendra, R. A. (2010). Accessing decision-making in software design. Design Studies, 31(6), 641–662. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005
- Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. The Free Press. DOI: 10.2307/2090685
- Coyne, R. (2005). Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies, 26(1), 5–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005
- Del Gaudio, C., Franzato, C., & de Oliveira, A. J. (2016). Sharing design agency with local partners in participatory design. International Journal of Design, 10(1).
http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2403/727 - DeWalt, K. M., & DeWalt, B. R. (2010). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Rowman Altamira.
- Dixon, J. A., & Foster, D. H. (1997). Gender and hedging: From sex differences to situated practice. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(1), 89–107. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025064205478
- Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
- Dorst, K. (2019). Co-evolution and emergence in design. Design Studies, 65, 60–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.005
- Edwards, A. (2007). Relational agency in professional practice: A CHAT analysis. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1, 1–17.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228665665.pdf - Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. DOI: 10.1086/231294
- Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511619847
- Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781529716641
- Fraser, M. W. (1996). Aggressive behavior in childhood and early adolescence: An ecological-developmental perspective on youth violence. Social Work, 41(4), 347–361. DOI: 10.1093/sw/41.4.347
- Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315819679
- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
- Ginwright, S., Cammarota, J., & Noguera, P. (2006).
Sociopolitical development: The missing link in research and policy on adolescents . In S. Ginwright, P. Noguera, & J. Cammarota (Eds.), Beyond resistance!: Youth activism and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. - Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5
- Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1993). The voice of the customer. Marketing Science, 12(1), 1–27. DOI: 10.1287/mksc.12.1.1
- Harfield, S. (2007). On design ‘problematization’: Theorising differences in designed outcomes. Design Studies, 28(2), 159–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.005
- Hauser, J., & Clausing, D. (1988). The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, 66(3), 63–73.
- Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. DOI: 10.1007/BF02300500
- Kim, E., Purzer, S., Vivas-Valencia, C., & Payne, L. B. (2020). Problem reframing and empathy manifestation in the innovation process. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--35084
- Kirn, A., & Benson, L. (2018). Engineering students’ perceptions of problem solving and their future. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 87–112. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20190
- Konopasky, A. W., & Sheridan, K. M. (2016). Towards a diagnostic toolkit for the language of agency. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(2), 108–123. DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2015.1128952
- Magnifico, C., & Defrancq, B. (2017). Hedges in conference interpreting: The role of gender. Interpreting, 19(1), 21–46. DOI: 10.1075/intp.19.1.02mag
- Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R., & Kennedy, M. S. (2016). Measuring undergraduate students’ engineering self-efficacy: A validation study. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 366–395. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20121
- Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997).
Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis . In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3–18). de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110807332 - McDonnell, J. (2018). Design roulette: A close examination of collaborative decision-making in design from the perspective of framing. Design Studies, 57, 75–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.001
- Merriam, S. B. (2007). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
- Mirzapour, F. (2016). Gender differences in the use of hedges and first person pronouns in research articles of applied linguistics and chemistry. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(6), 166–173. DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.6p.166
- Mohanani, R., Turhan, B., & Ralph, P. (2019). Requirements framing affects design creativity. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2019.2909033
- Mohedas, I., Daly, S. R., & Sienko, K. H. (2015). Requirements development: Approaches and behaviors of novice designers. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(7),
071407 . DOI: 10.1115/1.4030058 - Moje, E. B. (2000). “To be part of the story”: The literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102(3), 651–690.
https://www.tcrecord.org/books/PrintContent.asp?ContentID=10517 . DOI: 10.1111/0161-4681.00071 - Morozov, A., Kilgore, D., & Atman, C. (2007). Breadth in design problem scoping: Using insights from experts to investigate student processes. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--2318
- Murray, J. K., Studer, J. A., Daly, S. R., McKilligan, S., & Seifert, C. M. (2019). Design by taking perspectives: How engineers explore problems. Journal of Engineering Education, 108, 248–275. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20263
- Narayan, D., & Petesch, P. (2007).
Agency, opportunity structure, and poverty escapes . In D. Narayan & P. Petesch (Eds.), Moving Out of Poverty: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Mobility (pp. 1–44). The World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6991-3 - Neeley, W. L.,
Jr. , Lim, K., Zhu, A., & Yang, M. C. (2013). Building fast to think faster: exploiting rapid prototyping to accelerate ideation during early stage design. ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. DOI: 10.1115/DETC2013-12635 - Onarheim, B., & Biskjaer, M. M. (2017).
Balancing constraints and the sweet spot as coming topics for creativity research . In L. J. Ball (Ed.), Creativity in design: Understanding, capturing, supporting.https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/24848278.pdf - Pajares, F. (2005).
Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs . In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294–315). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614446.015 - Paton, B., & Dorst, K. (2011). Briefing and reframing: A situated practice. Design Studies, 32(6), 573–587. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.002
- Peele-Eady, T. B., & Moje, E. B. (2020).
Communities as contexts for learning . In Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 230–246). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203774977-16 - Peräkylä, A. (2011).
Validity in research on naturally occurring social interaction . In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 365–382). Sage. - Petrosino, A. J., Martin, T., & Svihla, V. (Eds.). (2007). Developing student expertise and community: Lessons from How People Learn (Vol. 108). Jossey-Bass.
- Pugh, S., & Clausing, D. (1996). Creating innovtive products using total design: The living legacy of Stuart Pugh. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
- Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies, 17(4), 363–383. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00023-3
- Reimlinger, B., Lohmeyer, Q., Moryson, R., & Meboldt, M. (2019). A comparison of how novice and experienced design engineers benefit from design guidelines. Design Studies, 63, 204–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.004
- Restrepo, J., & Christiaans, H. (2004). Problem structuring and information access in design. Journal of Design Research, 4(2), 218–236. DOI: 10.1504/JDR.2004.009842
- Russell, T. F., & Orbey, N. (1993). The technically feasible design. Chemical Engineering Education, 27(3), 166–169.
https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/download/123763/122796 - Schegloff, E. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(1), 99–128. DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
- Sewell, W. H.,
Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29. DOI: 10.1086/229967 - Shum, S. (1991).
Cognitive dimensions of design rationale . In D. Diaper & N. V. Hammond (Eds.), People and computers VI. Cambridge University Press. - Siwatu, K. O. (2007). Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1086–1101. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.011
- Sterman, J. D. (1992). Teaching takes off. OR/MS Today, 35(3), 40–44.
- Svihla, V. (2009). Collaboration and framing as dimensions of design innovation. In N. Bryan-Kinns, M. D. Gross, H. Johnson, J. Ox, & R. Wakkary (Eds.), Everyday Creativity Shared Languages and Collective Action: Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on creativity and cognition (pp. 285–294).
ACM . DOI: 10.1145/1640233.1640276 - Svihla, V. (2010a). Collaboration as a dimension of design innovation. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 6(4), 245–262. DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2010.533186
- Svihla, V. (2010b).
Contingent identification in a biomedical engineering classroom . In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the Disciplines, 1, 913–920. International Society of the Learning Sciences.https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/2773 - Svihla, V., Petrosino, A., Martin, T., Rayne, K., Rivale, S. R., & Diller, K. R. (2007). Distributed expertise and authenticity in the development of design expertise. In C. S. Furtado & M. d. G. Rasteiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education.
iNEER .http://icee2007.dei.uc.pt/proceedings/papers/387.pdf - Svihla, V., Petrosino, A. J., & Diller, K. R. (2012). Learning to design: Authenticity, negotiation, and innovation. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(4), 782–298.
http://sites.utexas.edu/texas-bmes/files/2015/07/2012-Learning-to-Design-Authenticity-Negotiation-and-Innovation.pdf - Svihla, V., Petrosino, A. J., Martin, T., & Diller, K. R. (2009).
Learning to design: Interactions that promote innovation . In W. Aung, K.-S. Kim, J. Mecsi, J. Moscinski, & I. Rouse (Eds.), Innovations 2009: World Innovations in Engineering Education and Research (pp. 375–391). International Network for Engineering Education and Research. - Tholander, J., Normark, M., & Rossitto, C. (2012). Understanding agency in interaction design materials. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2499–2508.
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2207676.2208417?casa_token=dOKmBEt9gPEAAAAA:EfJIM7Ab-ACMnH07z4N03VHbP5wHsS61y-Q17gg0-dAm5PolpcWzigXXUC18tye7N1m4uqm1WsQJ - Walton, J. (1992).
Making the theoretical case . In C. Ragin & H. Becker (Eds.), What is a case?: Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 121–138). Cambridge University Press. - Watkins, J., Spencer, K., & Hammer, D. (2014). Examining young students’ problem scoping in engineering design. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1),
5 . DOI: 10.7771/2157-9288.1082 - Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Sage.
- Young, D. S., & Casey, E. A. (2019). An examination of the sufficiency of small qualitative samples. Social Work Research, 43(1), 53–58. DOI: 10.1093/swr/svy026
- Zahedi, M., & Heaton, L. (2017). A model of framing in design teams. Design and Technology Education, 22(2).
https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/2264
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.69 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 96 - 119
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 11, 2021
Published on: Dec 21, 2021
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2021 Vanessa Svihla, Tryphenia Peele-Eady, Amber Gallup, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.