Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative Research Cover

Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative Research

By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. #SayTheirNames. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://sayevery.name/
  2. Beddoes, K. (2014). Methodology discourses as boundary work in the construction of engineering education. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 293312. DOI: 10.1177/0306312713510431
  3. Bilge, S., & Collins, P. H. (2016). Intersectionality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  4. Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2012). Critical race theory: An introduction (2nd Edition). New York, NY: New York University Press.
  5. DiAngelo, R. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  6. Dorans, N. J., & Cook, L. L. (2016). Fairness in educational assessment and measurement. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315774527
  7. Douglas, K. A., & Purzer, Ş. (2015). Validity: Meaning and relevancy in assessment for engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(2), 108118. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20070
  8. Douglas, K. A., Rynearson, A., Purzer, Ş., & Strobel, J. (2016). Reliability, validity, and fairness: A content analysis of assessment development publications in major engineering education journals. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 19601971.
  9. Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, “Big Data” and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158179. DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417
  10. Godwin, A., Benedict, B., Thielmeyer, A., Rohde, J. A., Perkins, H. L., Major, J. C., … Chen, S. (2020). New epistemological perspectives on quantitative methods: An example using Topological Data Analysis. Studies in Engineering Education, in review.
  11. Godwin, A., & Boudouris, B. W. (2020). Fostering motivation for chemical engineering students’ academic success: An example from a sophomore materials and energy balances course. Chemical Engineering Education, 54(3), 121128.
  12. Godwin, A., Thielmeyer, A., Rohde, J. A., Verdin, D., Benedict, B. S., Baker, R. A., & Doyle, J. (2019). Using topological data analysis in social science research: Unpacking decisions and opportunities for a new method. In ASEE 2019: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Expositition (p. 13). Tampa, FL. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/33522
  13. Holland, P. W. (2008). Causation and race. In T. Zuberi & E. Bonilla-Savila (Eds.), White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology (pp. 93110). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  14. Holly, J., Jr. (2020). Disentangling engineering education research’s anti-Blackness. Journal of Engineering Education. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20364
  15. Hundleby, C. E. (2012). Feminist empiricism. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis (2nd Edition, pp. 2845). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. DOI: 10.4135/9781483384740.n2
  16. Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 3557. DOI: 10.1080/09518390500450144
  17. Long, L. L., III (2020). Toward an antiracist engineering classroom for 2020 and beyond: A starter kit. Journal of Engineering Education. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20363
  18. Martin, J. P., & Garza, C. (2020). Centering the marginalized student’s voice through autoethnography: Implications for engineering education research. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(1), 119. DOI: 10.21061/see.1
  19. McCall, L. (2001). Complex inequality: Gender, class, and race in the new economy. New York, NY: Psychology Press. DOI: 10.4324/9780203902455
  20. Miller, S. I. (1998). Response: Coloring within and outside the lines: Some comments on Scheurich and Young’s “Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased?” Educational Researcher, 27(9), 2326. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X027009023
  21. Oakley, A. (1998). Gender, methodology and people’s ways of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology, 32(4), 707731. DOI: 10.1177/0038038598032004005
  22. Okun, T. (2000). White supremacy culture. In T. Okun & K. Jones (Eds.), Dismantling racism: A workbook for social change groups. Durham, NC: Change Work. Retrieved from https://www.dismantlingracism.org/uploads/4/3/5/7/43579015/okun_-_white_sup_culture.pdf
  23. Reed, I. A. (2010). Epistemology contextualized: Social-scientific knowledge in a postpositivist era. Sociological Theory, 28(1), 2039. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01365.x
  24. Riley, D. (2017). Rigor/Us: Building boundaries and disciplining diversity with standards of merit. Engineering Studies, 9(3), 249265. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631
  25. Scheurich, J. J., & Young, M. D. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased? Educational Researcher, 26(4), 416. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X026004004
  26. Secules, S., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Turpen, C. (2018). Zooming out from the struggling individual student: An account of the cultural construction of engineering ability in an undergraduate programming class. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 5686. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20191
  27. Slaton, A. E., & Pawley, A. L. (2018). The power and politics of engineering education research design: Saving the “Small N.” Engineering Studies, 10(2–3), 133157. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2018.1550785
  28. Sprague, J. (2005). How feminists count: Critical strategies for quantitative methods in Howard, J, Risman, B and Sprague, J. In J. Sprague (Ed.), Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging differences (pp. 81117). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  29. Walther, J., Pawley, A. L., & Sochacka, N. W. (2015). Exploring ethical validation as a key consideration in interpretive research quality. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Seattle, WA. DOI: 10.18260/p.24063
  30. Zuberi, T., & Bonilla-Silva, E. (Eds.). (2008). White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.64 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 82
Submitted on: Nov 12, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 13, 2020
Published on: Dec 21, 2020
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Allison Godwin, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.