Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
New Perspectives for Implementing Grounded Theory Cover

New Perspectives for Implementing Grounded Theory

Open Access
|Feb 2021

References

  1. Anthony, L. J., Palius, M. F., Maher, C. A., & Moghe, P. V. (2007). Using discourse analysis to study a cross-disciplinary learning community: Insights from an IGERT training program. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 141156. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00924.x
  2. Baker, C., Wuest, J., & Stern, P. N. (1992). Method slurring: The grounded theory/phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(11), 13551360. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01859.x
  3. Baker, S., Tancred, P., & Whitesides, S. (2002). Gender and graduate school: Engineering students confront life after the B. Eng. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 4147. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00671.x
  4. Beddoes, K., Schimpf, C. M., & Pawley, A. L. (2014, June 15–18). New metaphors for new understandings: Ontological questions about developing grounded theories in engineering education [Paper presentation]. 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--22867
  5. Bello, A. U. (2015). Using the Classical Grounded Theory rather than the Strauss and Corbin approach in accounting and management Research. In V. Cassar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (pp. 4147). Academic Conferences and Publishing International, Ltd. http://library.palcomtech.com/pdf/5421.pdf
  6. Bilén, S. G., Kisenwether, E. C., Rzasa, S. E., & Wise, J. C. (2005). Developing and assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills and mind-set. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(2), 233243. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00844.x
  7. Birks, M. & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide (2nd ed.), Sage.
  8. Blosser, E. (2019). An examination of Black women’s experiences in undergraduate engineering on a primarily white campus: Considering institutional strategies for change. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 5271. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20304
  9. Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 310. DOI: 10.2307/2088165
  10. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
  11. Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36(4), 391409. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020909529486
  12. Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P., & Amelink, C. T. (2009). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 5366. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x
  13. Bowen, G. A. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 1223. DOI: 10.1177/160940690600500304
  14. Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Lord, S. M., Long, R. A., & Ohland, A. W. (2012). Women in industrial engineering: Stereotypes, persistence, and perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 288318. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00051.x
  15. Bryant, A. (2009). Grounded theory and pragmatism: The curious case of Anselm Strauss. Qualitative Social Research, 10(3), 131. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-10.3.1358
  16. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781848607941
  17. Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging methodologies in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186210. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x
  18. Charmaz, K. (1990). “Discovering” chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science and Medicine, 30(11), 11611172. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90256-R
  19. Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies for qualitative inquiry (pp. 249291). Sage.
  20. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
  21. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage. DOI: 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosg070.pub2
  22. Charmaz, K. (2017). The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 3445. DOI: 10.1177/1077800416657105
  23. Clarke, A. E. (2007). Grounded theory: Critiques, debates, and situational analysis. In W. Outhwaite & S. Turner (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social science methodology (pp. 423442). Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781848607958
  24. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 321. DOI: 10.1007/BF00988593
  25. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781452230153
  26. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
  27. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). Sage.
  28. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124130. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
  29. Diefes-Dux, H. A., Zawojewski, J. S., Hjalmarson, M. A., & Cardella, M. E. (2012). A framework for analyzing feedback in a formative assessment system for mathematical modeling problems. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 375406. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00054.x
  30. Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111124. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
  31. Dunsmore, K., Turns, J., & Yellin, J. M. (2011). Looking toward the real world: Student conceptions of engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 329348. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00016.x
  32. Faber, C. J., Benson, L., Kajfez, R. L., Kennedy, M. S., Lee, D. M., McAlister, A. M., Sobieraj, K. S., Porter, T., St. Germain, A., & Wu, G. (2019, June 15–19). Dynamics of researcher identity and epistemology: The development of a grounded theory model [Paper presentation]. 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32358
  33. Gainsburg, J. (2015). Engineering students’ epistemological views on mathematical methods in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(2), 139166. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20073
  34. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Sociology Press.
  35. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussion. Sociology Press.
  36. Glaser, B. G. (2002). Constructivist grounded theory? Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). DOI: 10.17169/fqs-3.3.825
  37. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
  38. Greckhamer, T., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2005). The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(6), 729750. DOI: 10.1080/09518390500298204
  39. Groen, C. (2017). Advancing from outsider to insider: A grounded theory of professional identity negotiation (Publication No.14662) [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech]. VTechWorks. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/77392
  40. Groen, C., McNair, L. D., Paretti, M. C., Simmons, D. R., & Shew, A. (2018, June 23–27). Exploring professional identity development in undergraduate civil engineering students who experience disabilities [Paper presentation]. 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--30052
  41. Groen, C., Simmons, D. R., & McNair, L. D. (2017, June 24–28). An introduction to grounded theory: Choosing and implementing an emergent method [Paper presentation]. 2017 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH. https://peer.asee.org/27582
  42. Groen-McCall, C., McNair, L. D., Paretti, M. C., Shew, A., & Simmons, D. R. (2019, June 15–19). Exploring professional identity formation in undergraduate civil engineering students who experience disabilities: Establishing definitions of self [Paper presentation]. 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL. https://peer.asee.org/32170
  43. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105117). Sage.
  44. Hachtmann, F. (2012). The process of general education reform from a faculty perspective: A grounded theory approach, The Journal of General Education, 61(1), 1638. DOI: 10.5325/jgeneeduc.61.1.0016
  45. Häggström, M., Asplund, K., & Kristiansen, L. (2012). How can nurses facilitate patients’ transitions from intensive care?: A grounded theory of nursing. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 28(4), 224233. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.01.002
  46. Hallberg, L. R. M. (2006). The “core category” of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 1(3), 141148. DOI: 10.1080/17482620600858399
  47. Heath, H., & Cowley, S. (2004). Developing a grounded theory approach: A comparison of Glaser and Strauss. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(2), 141150. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00113-5
  48. Hood, J. C. (2007). Orthodox vs. power: The defining traits of grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory research (pp. 151164). Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781848607941.n7
  49. Johnson-Glauch, N., & Herman, G. L. (2019). Engineering representations guide student problem-solving in statics. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(2), 220247. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20258
  50. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C., (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139151. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x
  51. Jones, M., & Alony, I. (2011). Guiding the use of grounded theory in doctoral studies: An example from the Australian film industry. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, vol. 6, 95114. DOI: 10.28945/1429
  52. Jones, R., & Noble, G. (2007). Grounded theory and management research: A lack of integrity? Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 2(2), 84103. DOI: 10.1108/17465640710778502
  53. Kolb, S. M. (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies. 3(1), 8386. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC135409
  54. Kong, Y., Douglas, K. A., Rodgers, K. J., Diefes-Dux, H., & Madhavan, K. (2017). A size and scale framework for guiding curriculum design and assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 431453. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20172
  55. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers.
  56. Ma, S., Herman, G. L., West, M., Tomkin, J., & Mestre, J. (2016, October 12–16). Studying faculty communities of practice through social network analysis [Paper presentation]. 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Erie, PA. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757561
  57. Marjoram, T. (2013). Transforming engineering education for innovation and development: A policy perspective. In K. Mohd-Yusof, M. Arsat, M. T. Borhan, E. de Graaff, A. Kolmos & F. A. Phang (Eds.), PBL across cultures (pp. 272278). Aalborg University Press. https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/80414830/samlet_1_.pdf
  58. Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 311. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X033002003
  59. McCall, C., Shew, A., Simmons, D. R., Paretti, M. C., & McNair, L. D. (2020). Exploring student disability and professional identity: Navigating sociocultural expectations in U.S. undergraduate civil engineering programs. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 7989. DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1720434
  60. McKenna, M. K., & Millen, J. (2013). Look! Listen! Learn! Parent narratives and grounded theory models of parent voice, presence, and engagement in K–12 education. School Community Journal, 23(1), 948. https://www.adi.org/journal/2013ss/McKennaMillenSpring2013.pdf
  61. McNeill, N. J., Douglas, E. P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Therriault, D. J., & Krause, I. (2016). Undergraduate students’ beliefs about engineering problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 560584. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20150
  62. Nelson, K. G., McKenna, A. F., Brem, S. K., Hilpert, J., Husman, J., & Pettinato, E. (2017). Students’ misconceptions about semiconductors and use of knowledge in simulations. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 218244. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20163
  63. Secules, S., McCall, C., Mejia, J. A., Beebe, C., Masters, A. S., Sanchez-Peña, M., & Svyantek, M. (2021). Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Journal of Engineering Education. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20377
  64. Simmons, D. R. (2012). First generation college students in engineering: A grounded theory study of family influence on academic decision making (Publication No. 932) [Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University]. TigerPrints. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/932
  65. Simmons, D. R., & Martin, J. P. (2014). Developing effective engineering fictive kin to support undergraduate first-generation college students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(3), 279292. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014010979
  66. Stern, P. N. (1994). Eroding grounded theory. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research (pp. 212223). Sage.
  67. Stern, P. N. (2007). On solid ground: Essential properties for growing grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 114126). Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781848607941
  68. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511557842
  69. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
  70. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273285). Sage.
  71. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
  72. Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633642. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2006.22083020
  73. Tang, K. S. (2013). Out-of-school media representations of science and technology and their relevance for engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 5176. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20007
  74. Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243259. DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2011.581686
  75. Tonso, K. L. (2006). Teams that work: Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 2537. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00875.x
  76. Tryggvason, G., & Apelian, D. (2012). Meeting new challenges: Transforming engineering education. In G. Tryggvason & D. Apelian (Eds.), Shaping our world: Engineering education for the 21st Century (pp. 318). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: 10.1002/9781118138267
  77. Tufford, L., & Newman, P. (2010). Bracketing in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 11(1), 8096. DOI: 10.1177/1473325010368316
  78. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Routledge.
  79. Walther, J., Kellam, N., Sochacka, N., & Radcliffe, D. (2011). Engineering competence? An interpretive investigation of engineering students’ professional formation. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 703740. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00033.x
  80. Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013). Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 626659. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20029
  81. Williams, A. M. (1998). The delivery of quality nursing care: A grounded theory study of the nurse’s perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(4), 808816. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00590.x
  82. Wilson-Lopez, A., Mejia, J. A., Hasbún, I. M., & Kasun, G. S. (2016). Latina/o adolescents’ funds of knowledge related to engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 278311. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20117
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.49 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 107
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2020
Accepted on: Jan 8, 2021
Published on: Feb 17, 2021
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Cassandra McCall, Cherie Edwards, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.