Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Uncovering Epistemologies and Values of Our Qualitative Engineering Education Research Community: Listening for Voices Cover

Uncovering Epistemologies and Values of Our Qualitative Engineering Education Research Community: Listening for Voices

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Alasuutari, P. (2010). The rise and relevance of qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 139155. DOI: 10.1080/13645570902966056
  2. American Psychological Association (Washington, District of Columbia) (Ed.). (2019). Publication manual of the American psychological association (Seventh edition). American Psychological Association.
  3. Beddoes, K. (2014a). Using peer reviews to examine micropolitics and disciplinary development of engineering education: A case study. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(2), 266277. DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2012.745735
  4. Beddoes, K. (2014b). Methodology discourses as boundary work in the construction of engineering education. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 293312. DOI: 10.1177/0306312713510431
  5. Benson, L. (2019). Editor’s page. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(2), 143144. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20257
  6. Boklage, A., Coley, B., & Kellam, N. (2019). Understanding engineering educators’ pedagogical transformations through the Hero’s Journey. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(6), 923938. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1500999
  7. Borrego, M. (2007). Development of Engineering Education as a Rigorous Discipline: A Study of the Publication Patterns of Four Coalitions. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 518. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00911.x
  8. Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220252. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20040
  9. Brown, B. A., Henderson, J. B., Gray, S., Donovan, B., Sullivan, S., Patterson, A., & Waggstaff, W. (2016). From description to explanation: An empirical exploration of the African-American pipeline problem in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 146177. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21249
  10. Burt, B. A. (2020). Broadening participation in the engineering professoriate: Influences on Allen’s journey in developing professorial intentions. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 821842. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20353
  11. Carstensen, A. K., & Bernhard, J. (2019). Design science research – a powerful tool for improving methods in engineering education research. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(1–2), 85102. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1498459
  12. Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging Methodologies in Engineering Education Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186210. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x
  13. Coley, B. C., Simmons, D. R., & Lord, S. M. (2021). Dissolving the margins: LEANING INto an antiracist review process. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 814. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20375
  14. Council of National Psychological Associations for the Advancement of Ethnic Minority Interests. (2016). Testing and Assessment with Persons and Communities of Color. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pi/oema
  15. Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (1995). Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. The New Press.
  16. Curran, A. S. (2011). The Anatomy of Blackness: Science and Slavery in an Age of Enlightenment. JHU Press.
  17. Delgado, R., Stefancic, J., & Harris, A. (2012). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York University Press.
  18. Eastman, M. G., Miles, M. L., & Yerrick, R. (2019). Exploring the White and male culture: Investigating individual perspectives of equity and privilege in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 459480. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20290
  19. Edstrom, K., Benson, L., Mitchell, J., Bernhard, J., van den Bogaard, M., Finelli, C., Kellam, N., Lee, M., Lord, S., Rover, D., Saliah-Hassane, H., & Zappe, S. (2020). Review unto others as you would have others review unto you. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 12. DOI: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274132
  20. Farrall, L. A. (1979). The history of eugenics: A bibliographical review. Annals of Science, 36(2), 111123. DOI: 10.1080/00033797900200431
  21. Foor, C. E., Walden, S. E., & Trytten, D. A. (2007). “I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group”: Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 103115. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x
  22. Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language. In The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. DOI: 10.1002/9780470776407.ch20
  23. Fourati-Jamoussi, F., Dubois, M. J. F., Agnès, M., Leroux, V., & Sauvée, L. (2019). Sustainable development as a driver for educational innovation in engineering school: The case of UniLaSalle. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(4), 570588. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1501348
  24. Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishers.
  25. Gee, J. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315819662
  26. Gilligan, C., Spencer, R., Weinberg, M. K., & Bertsch, T. (2003). On the listening guide: A voice-centered relational method. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 157172). American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/10595-009
  27. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine.
  28. Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction (5th ed.). Pearson.
  29. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191216). Sage.
  30. Hampton, C., Reeping, D., & Ozkan, D. S. (2021). Positionality statements in engineering education research: A look at the hand that guides the methodological tools. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(2), 126. DOI: 10.21061/see.13
  31. Holland, D. P., Walsh, C. J., & Bennett, G. J. (2019). A qualitative investigation of design knowledge reuse in project-based mechanical design courses. European Journal of Engineering Education (UK), 44(1–2), 137152. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1463196
  32. Howe, K., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 29. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X019004002
  33. Jamieson, L. H., & Lohman, J. R. (2009). Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education: Ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society. American Society for Engineering Education Report.
  34. Jordan, S. S., Foster, C. H., Anderson, I. K., Betoney, C. A., & Pangan, T. J. D. (2019). Learning from the experiences of Navajo engineers: Looking toward the development of a culturally responsive engineering curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(3), 355376. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20287
  35. Kellam, N., & Cirell, A. (2018). Quality considerations in qualitative inquiry: Expanding our understanding for the broader dissemination of qualitative research. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 355361. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20227
  36. Koro-Ljungberg (Koro), M., & Douglas, E. P. (2008). State of qualitative research in engineering education: Meta-analysis of JEE articles, 2005–2006. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 163175. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00965.x
  37. Lima, R. G. de, Lins, H. N., Pfitscher, E. D., Garcia, J., Suni, A., Guerra, J. B. S. O. de A., & Delle, F. C. R. (2016). A sustainability evaluation framework for Science and Technology Institutes: An international comparative analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125, 145158. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.028
  38. Liu, Q. (2019). A snapshot methodological review of journal articles in engineering education research. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). DOI: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.13795
  39. Lombardo, P. A. (1987). Miscegenation, eugenics, and racism: Historical footnotes to Loving v. Virginia. U.C. Davis Law Review, 21, 421.
  40. Main, J. B., Camacho, M. M., Mobley, C., Brawner, C. E., Lord, S. M., & Kesim, H. (2019). Technically and tactically proficient: How military leadership training and experiences are enacted in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(2), 446457.
  41. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography—A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 2849. JSTOR.
  42. McCord, R. E., & Matusovich, H. M. (2019). Naturalistic observations of metacognition in engineering: Using observational methods to study metacognitive engagement in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 481502. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20291
  43. Meyer, M., & Fang, N. (2019). A qualitative case study of persistence of engineering undergraduates. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(1), 99108.
  44. Minichiello, A., Marx, S., McNeill, L., & Hailey, C. (2019). Exploring student study behaviours in engineering: How undergraduates prepared textbook problems for online submission. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(1–2), 253270. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1474342
  45. Mishler, E. (1991). Representing discourse: The rhetoric of transcription. Journal of Narrative and Life History/Narrative Inquiry, 1(4), 255280. DOI: 10.1075/jnlh.1.4.01rep
  46. Mobley, C., Main, J. B., Brawner, C. B., Lord, S. M., & Camacho, M. M. (2019). Pride and promise: The enactment and salience of identity among first-generation student veterans in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(1(A)), 3549.
  47. Mukhtar, N., Saud, M. S., Kamin, Y., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Mohd Kosnin, A., Yahaya, N., Abd Hamid, M. Z., Abd Latib, A., & Nordin, M. S. (2019). Environmental sustainability competency framework for polytechnics engineering programmes. IEEE Access (USA), 7, 125991126004. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936632
  48. Neejer, C. (2015). The American eugenics movement. In A Companion to the History of American Science (pp. 345360). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781119072218.ch27
  49. Pawley, A. L. (2013). “Learning from small numbers” of underrepresented students’ stories: Discussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrative. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--19030
  50. Pawley, A. L. (2017). Shifting the “default”: The case for making diversity the expected condition for engineering education and making whiteness and maleness visible. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 531533. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20181
  51. Pawley, A. L. (2019). Learning from small numbers: Studying ruling relations that gender and race the structure of U.S. engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(1), 1331. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20247
  52. Pawley, A. L., & Phillips, C. M. (2014). From the mouths of students: Two illustrations of narrative analysis to under-stand engineering education’s ruling relations as gendered and raced. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition DOI: 10.18260/1-2--20524
  53. Pawley, A. L., Schimpf, C., & Nelson, L. (2016). Gender in engineering education research: A content analysis of research in JEE, 1998–2012. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(3), 508528. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20128
  54. Pembridge, J. J., & Paretti, M. C. (2019). Characterizing capstone design teaching: A functional taxonomy. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(2), 197219. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20259
  55. Riley, D. (2017). Rigor/Us: Building boundaries and disciplining diversity with standards of merit. Engineering Studies, 9(3), 249265. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631
  56. Riley, D., Slaton, A. E., & Pawley, A. L. (2014). Social justice and inclusion women and minorities in engineering. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 335356). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.022
  57. Rulifson, G., & Bielefeldt, A. R. (2019). Learning social responsibility: Evolutions of undergraduate students’ predicted engineering futures. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(2), 572584.
  58. Sadikin, A. N., Mohd-Yusof, K., Aliah Phang, F., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2019). The introduction to engineering course: A case study from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Education for Chemical Engineers, 28, 4553. DOI: 10.1016/j.ece.2019.04.001
  59. Secules, S., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Turpen, C. (2018). Zooming out from the struggling individual student: An account of the cultural construction of engineering ability in an undergraduate programming class. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 5686. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20191
  60. Secules, S., McCall, C., Mejia, J. A., Beebe, C., Masters, A. S. L., Sánchez-Peña, M., & Svyantek, M. (2021). Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 1943. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20377
  61. Seiradakis, E., & Spantidakis, I. (2019). EFL engineering students’ research article genre knowledge development through concept mapping tasks: A qualitative interview-based study. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 7, 45. DOI: 10.5296/jsel.v7i1.14870
  62. Slaton, A., & Pawley, A. (2018). The power and politics of engineering education research design: Saving the ‘small N.’ Engineering Studies, 10(2–3), 133157. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2018.1550785
  63. Staller, K. M. (2013). Epistemological boot camp: The politics of science and what every qualitative researcher needs to know to survive in the academy. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 12(4), 395413. DOI: 10.1177/1473325012450483
  64. Steinmetz, G. (2005). The epistemological unconscious of U.S. sociology and the transition to post-Fordism: The case of historical sociology. In J. Adams, E. Clemens, & A. S. Orloff, Remaking Modernity. Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822385882-005
  65. Streveler, R. A., & Smith, K. A. (2006). Conducting rigorous research in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 103105. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00882.x
  66. ten Caten, C. S., Silva, D. S., Aguiar, R. B., Silva Filho, L. C. P., & Huerta, J. M. P. (2019). Reshaping engineering learning to promote innovative entrepreneurial behavior. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(1), 141148. DOI: 10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a13
  67. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837851. DOI: 10.1177/1077800410383121
  68. Tyson, T. N., & Oldroyd, D. (2019). Accounting for slavery during the Enlightenment: Contradictions and interpretations. Accounting History, 24(2), 212235. DOI: 10.1177/1032373218759971
  69. Valentine, A., Belski, I., Hamilton, M., & Adams, S. (2019). Creativity in electrical engineering degree programs: Where is the content? IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(4), 288296. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2019.2912834
  70. Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226849638.001.0001
  71. Waller, A. A. (2006). Special session—Fish is fish: Learning to see the sea we swim in: Theoretical Frameworks for Education Research. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 12. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2006.322605
  72. Walther, J., Pawley, A., & Sochacka, N. (2015). Exploring ethical validation as a key consideration in interpretive research quality. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/p.24063
  73. Walther, J., Sochacka, N., Benson, L., Bumbaco, A., Kellam, N., Pawley, A., & Phillips, C. (2017a). Qualitative research quality: A collaborative inquiry across multiple methodological perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 398430. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20170
  74. Walther, J., Sochacka, N., & Kellam, N. (2013). Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 626659. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20029
  75. Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., Benson, L., Bumbaco, A., Kellam, N. N., Pawley, A. L., & Phillips, C. M. (2017b). Qualitative research quality – A collaborative inquiry from multiple methodological perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 398430. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20170
  76. Wilder, C. S. (2013). Ebony and Ivy: Race, Slavery, and the Troubled History of America’s Universities. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  77. Winfield, A. G. (2007). Eugenics and Education in America: Institutionalized Racism and the Implications of History, Ideology, and Memory. Peter Lang.
  78. Yu, J. H., & Strobel, J. (2011). Instrument development: Engineering-specific epistemological, epistemic and ontological beliefs. Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 18.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.37 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 80 - 99
Submitted on: Jan 23, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 16, 2021
Published on: Dec 23, 2021
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Nadia Kellam, Madeleine Jennings, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.