Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
When Critical Ethnography Leaves the Field and Enters the Engineering Classroom: A Scoping Review Cover

When Critical Ethnography Leaves the Field and Enters the Engineering Classroom: A Scoping Review

Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. American Society for Engineering Education. (2014). Year of action on diversity. http://diversity.asee.org/
  2. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 1932. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
  3. Badger, D., Nursten, J., Williams, P., & Woodward, M. (2000). Should all literature reviews be systematic? Evaluation and Research in Education, 14, 220230. DOI: 10.1080/09500790008666974
  4. Banerjee, D., & Pawley, A. (2013). Gender and promotion: How do science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) faculty members survive and foggy climate? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 19(4), 329347. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2013004654
  5. Beddoes, K. D. (2012). Feminist scholarship in engineering education: Challenges and tensions. Engineering Studies, 4(3), 205232. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2012.693932
  6. Berhane, B., & Onuma, F. (2020). Learning while Black: Identity formation and experience for five Black men who transferred into engineering undergraduate programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 26(2), 93124. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020024994
  7. Bernhard, J., Carstensen, A., Davidsen, J., & Ryberg, T. (2019). Practical epistemic cognition in a design project—engineering students developing epistemic fluency. Transactions on Education, 62(3), 216225. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2019.2912348
  8. Bornasal, F., Brown, S., Perova-Mello, N., & Beddoes, K. (2018). Conceptual growth in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(2), 318349. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20196
  9. Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 4576. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20038
  10. Buch, A. (2016). Ideas of holistic engineering meet engineering work practices. Engineering Studies, 8(2), 140161. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2016.1197227
  11. Burt, B. (2019). Toward a theory of engineering professional intentions: The role of research group experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 289332. DOI: 10.3102/0002831218791467
  12. Campbell, C., Roth, W., & Jornet, A. (2019). Collaborative design decision-making as social process. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(3), 294311. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1465028
  13. Carroll, M. P. (2014). Shoot for the moon! The mentors and the middle schoolers explore the intersection of design thinking and STEM. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 1430. DOI: 10.7771/2157-9288.1072
  14. Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
  15. Carspecken, P. (2005). The social relevance of critical ethnography. In F. Bodone (Eds.), Counterpoints: What difference does research make and for whom (pp. 1128). Peter Lang.
  16. Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging research methodologies in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186210. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x
  17. Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 124. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2010.545065
  18. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). (2001). Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews, CRD Report 4 (2nd ed.). York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York.
  19. Chorev, S., & Anderson, A. R. (2006). Engineers learning to become entrepreneurs, simulations and barriers in Israel. International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, 16(5), 321338. DOI: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2006.010956
  20. Cicek, J. S., Ingram, S., Friesen, M., & Ruth, D. (2019). Action research: A methodology for transformative learning for a professor and his students in an engineering classroom. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(1–2), 4970. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1405242
  21. Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 12911294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
  22. Convertino, C. (2018). “La Migra” in the classroom: Transfronterizx students exploring mobility in transnational higher education on the US-Mexico border. Educational Studies, 54(5), 569582. DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2018.1492923
  23. Convertino, C., & Mein, E. (2017). Bridgework: Diversity and collaboration in an undergraduate preengineering course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24(4), 285296. DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2017.1362001
  24. Crede, E., & Borrego, M. (2013). From ethnography to items: A mixed methods approach to developing a survey to examine graduate engineering student retention. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 6280. DOI: 10.1177/1558689812451792
  25. Danielsson, A. T., Gonsalves, A. J., Silfver, E., & Berge, M. (2019). The pride and joy of engineering? The identity work of male working-class engineering students. Engineering Studies, 11(3), 172195. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2019.1663859
  26. Daudt, H., van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large intre-professional team’s experience with Arskey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 4856. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
  27. Eastman, M. G., Christman, J., Zion, G. H., & Yerrick, R. (2017). To educate engineers or to engineer educators? Exploring access to engineering careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(7), 884913. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21389
  28. Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christophers, L., & Rooney, B. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 2127. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.004
  29. Foley, D. (2002). Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. International Journal for Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(4), 469490. DOI: 10.1080/09518390210145534
  30. Foor, C. E., & Walden, S. E. (2009). “Imaginary engineering” or “re-imagined engineering”: Negotiating gendered identities in the borderland of a college of engineering. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 21(2), 4164.
  31. Foor, C. E., Walden, S. E., & Trytten, D. A. (2007). “I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group”: Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 103115. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x
  32. Gilbert, A. (2009). Disciplinary cultures in mechanical engineering and materials science: Gendered/gendering practices. Equal Opportunities International, 28(1), 2435. DOI: 10.1108/02610150910933613
  33. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  34. Hardcastle, M., Usher, K., & Holmes, C. (2006). Carspecken’s five-stage critical qualitative research method: An application to nursing research. Qualitative Health Research, 16(1), 151161. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305283998
  35. Hou, J., & McDowell, L. (2014). Learning together? Experiences on a China-U.K. articulation program in engineering. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(3), 223240. DOI: 10.1177/1028315313497591
  36. Khandekar, A. (2013). Education abroad: Engineering privatization, and the new middle class in neoliberalizing India. Engineering Studies, 5(3), 179198. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2013.859686
  37. Kincheloe, J., & McLaren, P. (2003). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 279314). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  38. Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 6977. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
  39. Madison, D. S. (2012). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  40. Malish, C. M., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2015). Higher education, reservation and scheduled castes: Exploring institutional habitus of professional engineering colleges in Kerala. Higher Education, 72, 603617. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-015-9966-7
  41. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  42. Martin, J. H., Hands, K. B., Lancaster, S. M., Tryteen, D. A., & Murphy, T. J. (2008). Hard but not too hard: Challenging courses and engineering students. College Teaching, 56(2), 107113. DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.56.2.107-113
  43. Martin, J. P., & Garza, C. (2020). Centering the marginalized student’s voice through autoethnography: Implications for engineering education research. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(1), 1. DOI: 10.21061/see.1
  44. Mays, N., Roberts, E., & Popay, J. (2001). Synthesising research evidence. In N. Furlop, P. Allen, A. Clarke, & N. Black (Eds.), Studying the organisation and delivery of health services: Research methods.> London: Routledge.
  45. McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (2006). Reconstructing culture in educational research. In L. A. Hammond & G. Spindler (Eds.), Innovations in educational ethnography: Theory, methods, and results. L. Erlbaum Associates. DOI: 10.4324/9780203837740
  46. McGee, E. O., White, D. T., Jenkins, A. T., Houston, S., Bentley, L. C., Smith, W. J., & Robinson, W. H. (2016). Blacking engineering students’ motivation for PhD attainment: Passion plus purpose. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10(2), 167193. DOI: 10.1108/JME-01-2016-0007
  47. McLoughlin, L. A. (2009). Success, recruitment, and retention of academically elite women students without STEM backgrounds in US undergraduate engineering education. Engineering Studies, 1(2), 151168. DOI: 10.1080/19378620902911592
  48. Mein, E., & Esquinca, A. (2014). Bilingualism as a resource in learning engineering on the U.S.—Mexico border. Action in Teacher Education, 36, 247260. DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2014.917366
  49. Mein, E., Esquinca, A., Monarrez, A., & Saldaña, C. (2020). Building a pathway to engineering: The influence of family and teachers among Mexican-origin undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(1), 3721. DOI: 10.1177/1538192718772082
  50. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2009). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132141. DOI: 10.1080/00405849209543534
  51. Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(143). DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
  52. National Science Board. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
  53. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  54. Pawley, A. L. (2009). Universalized narratives: Patterns in how faculty members define “engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 309319. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01029.x
  55. Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation, 8, 157181. DOI: 10.1177/1358902002008002512
  56. Ramey, K. E., & Uttal, D. H. (2017). Making sense of space: Distributed spatial sensemaking in a middle school summer engineering camp. Journal of Learning Sciences, 26(2), 277319. DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2016.1277226
  57. Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
  58. Shuman, L. J., Altman, C. J., Eschenbach, E. A., Felder, R. M., Imbrie, P. K., McGourty, J., Miller, R. L., Richards, L. G., Smith, K. A., Soulsby, E. P., Waller, A. A., & Yokomoto, C. F. (2002). The future of engineering education. 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, Boston, MA. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2002.1157986; DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2019.1663200; DOI: 10.1002/jee.20191
  59. Smith, J. M., & Lucena, J. (2016). “How do I show them I’m more than a person who can lift heavy things?” The funds of knowledge of low income, first generation engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 2(3), 199221. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2016015512
  60. Streveler, R., & Smith, K. A. (2006). Rigorous research in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 103105. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00882.x
  61. Tonso, K. L. (2006a). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 273307. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-005-9009-2
  62. Tonso, K. L. (2006b). Teams that work: Campus culture, engineering identity, and social interactions. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 2537. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00875.x
  63. Vickers, C. H. (2007). Second language socialization through team interaction among electrical and computer engineering students. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 621640. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00626.x
  64. Walden, S. E., & Foor, C. E. (2008). “What’s to keep you from dropping out?” Student Immigration into and within Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 191205. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00967.x
  65. Wilson-Lopez, A., Mejia, J. A., Hasbún, I. M., & Kasun, G. S. (2016). Latina/o adolescents’ funds of knowledge related to engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 278311. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20117
  66. Wolcott, H. F. (2008). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.26 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 52
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 17, 2021
Published on: May 19, 2021
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Stephanie Masta, Stephen Secules, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.