Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Continuity and Communication Across an Epistemologically Heterogenous Research Community: A Response to Kellam and Jennings (2021) Cover

Continuity and Communication Across an Epistemologically Heterogenous Research Community: A Response to Kellam and Jennings (2021)

By:   
Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  2. Becher, T. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education: Open University Press.
  3. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5.2, 121152. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
  4. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. In The foundations of social research (Vol. 802). SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7893-1_1
  5. Dewey, J. (1938). The relation of science and philosophy as the basis of education. In R. D. Archambault (Ed.), On education (pp. 1519). University of Chicago Press.
  6. Elby, A. (2009). Defining personal epistemology: A response to Hofer & Pintrich (1997) and Sandoval (2005). Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 138149. DOI: 10.1080/10508400802581684
  7. Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students’ epistemologies. In Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice, (pp. 409434). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511691904.013
  8. Fairlamb, H. (1986). Pragmatism and anti-theory: The consequences of theory. MLN, 101(5), 1216. DOI: 10.2307/2905716
  9. Foster, C. (2023). Methodological pragmatism in educational research: From qualitative-quantitative to exploratory-confirmatory distinctions. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 47(1), 419. DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2023.2210063
  10. Jawitz, J., & Case, J. (2009). Communicating your findings in engineering education: The value of making your theoretical perspective explicit. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 149154. DOI: 10.1080/03043790902833317
  11. Kellam, N., & Jennings, M. (2021). Uncovering epistemologies and values of our qualitative engineering education research community: Listening for voices. Studies in Engineering Education, 2(1), 80. DOI: 10.21061/see.37
  12. Kellam, N., & Jennings, M. (2022). Qualitative engineering education researchers and our relationships with data: Exploring our epistemologies and values as a community. [Paper presentation]. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--41088
  13. Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Douglas, E. P. (2008). State of qualitative research in engineering education: Meta-Analysis of JEE Articles, 2005–2006. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 163175. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00965.x
  14. Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 317377. DOI: 10.3102/00346543074003317
  15. Riley, D. (2017). Rigor/us: Building boundaries and disciplining diversity with standards of merit. Engineering Studies, 9(3), 249265. DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631
  16. Secules, S. (2023). On the importance of (white) humility: Epistemological decentering as a positional orientation toward research. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(2), 258261. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20508
  17. Secules, S., McCall, C., Mejia, J. A., Beebe, C., Masters, A. S., Sánchez-Peña, M. L., & Svyantek, M. (2021). Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 1943. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20377
  18. Smith, J. P., DiSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115163. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
  19. Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., Benson, L. C., Bumbaco, A. E., Kellam, N., Pawley, A. L., & Phillips, C. M. L. (2017). Qualitative Research Quality: A Collaborative Inquiry Across Multiple Methodological Perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 398430. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20170
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.162 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 157 - 166
Submitted on: Dec 9, 2023
Accepted on: Apr 8, 2024
Published on: May 9, 2024
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Stephen Secules, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.