Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Narrative Review of Design-Based Research in Engineering Education: Opportunities and Challenges Cover

A Narrative Review of Design-Based Research in Engineering Education: Opportunities and Challenges

Open Access
|Feb 2021

References

  1. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 1625. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
  2. Bakker, A. (2019). Design Research in Education: A Practical Guide for Early Career Researchers. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203701010
  3. *Bernhard, J. (2010). Insightful learning in the laboratory: Some experiences from 10 years of designing and using conceptual labs. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(3), 271287. DOI: 10.1080/03043791003739759
  4. *Blanchard, S., Judy, J., Muller, C., Crawford, R. H., Petrosino, A. J., White, C. K., Lin, F.-A., & Wood, K. L. (2015). Beyond blackboards: Engaging underserved middle school students in engineering. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1). DOI: 10.7771/2157-9288.1084
  5. Borrego, M. (2007). Conceptual difficulties experienced by trained engineers learning educational research methods. Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 91102. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00920.x
  6. Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 4576. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20038
  7. Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2015). What is the state of the art of systematic review in engineering education? Journal of Engineering Education, 104(2), 212242. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20069
  8. *Bower, M. (2011). Redesigning a web-conferencing environment to scaffold computing students’ creative design processes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 2742. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.14.1.27?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  9. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141178. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
  10. *Charlton, P., & Avramides, K. (2016). Knowledge construction in computer science and cngineering when learning through making. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), 379390. DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2016.2627567
  11. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 913. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032001009
  12. Cobb, P., Jackson, K., & Dunlap, C. (2017). Conducting design studies to investigate and support mathematics students’ and teachers’ learning. In J. Cai (Ed.), First compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 208233). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  13. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology, 96, 1522. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2
  14. Collins, J. A., & Fauser, C. J. M. (2005). Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Human Reproduction Update, 11(2), 103104. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmh058
  15. Creamer, E. G. (2017). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. SAGE. DOI: 10.4135/9781071802823
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  17. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meanings and perspective in the research process. London: SAGE Publishers. DOI: 10.4324/9781003115700
  18. *Dasgupta, C. (2019). Improvable models as scaffolds for promoting productive disciplinary engagement in an engineering design activity. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(3), 394417. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20282
  19. *Diefes-Dux, H. A., Zawojewski, J. S., & Hjalmarson, M. A. (2010). Using educational research in the design of evaluation tools for open-ended problems. International Journal Engineering Education, 26(4). https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c260410.html
  20. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105121. DOI: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_4
  21. *Fan, S.-C., & Yu, K.-C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 107129. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x
  22. Fan, S.-C., Yu, K.-C., & Lou, S.-J. (2018). Why do students present different design objectives in engineering design projects? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(4), 10391060. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-017-9420-5
  23. Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230235. DOI: 10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
  24. *Friedrichsen, D. M., Smith, C., & Koretsky, M. D. (2017). Propagation from the start: The spread of a concept-based instructional tool. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 177202. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9473-2
  25. Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design? Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2208538
  26. *Gomez, J. R., & Svihla, V. (2019). Building individual accountability through consensus. Chemical Engineering Education, 53(2). DOI: 10.18260/2-1-370.660-108007
  27. Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101117. DOI: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
  28. *Guisasola, J., Zuza, K., Ametller, J., & Gutierrez-Berraondo, J. (2017). Evaluating and redesigning teaching learning sequences at the introductory physics level. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020139. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020139
  29. *Guloy, S., Salimi, F., Cukierman, D., & McGee Thompson, D. (2017). Insights on supporting learning during computing science and engineering students’ transition to university: A design-oriented, mixed methods exploration of instructor and student perspectives. Higher Education, 73(3), 479497. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-016-0097-6
  30. *Hardré, P. L., Nanny, M., Refai, H., Ling, C., & Slater, J. (2010). Engineering a dynamic science learning environment for K–12 teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly (Spring), 37(2), 157178. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479594
  31. Hertzberg, J., Leppek, B., & Gray, K. (2012). Art for the sake of improving attitudes towards engineering. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--20966
  32. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2014). Feminist approaches to in-depth interviewing. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Feminist research practice: A primer (pp. 182232). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
  33. *Hira, A., & Hynes, M. M. (2019). Design-based research to broaden participation in pre-college engineering: Research and practice of an interest-based engineering challenges framework. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(1–2), 103122. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1405243
  34. Hoadley, C. P. (2002). Creating context: Design based research in creating and understanding CSCL. Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundation for a CSCL Community. http://www.designbasedresearch.org/reppubs/hoadley-cscl02.pdf. DOI: 10.3115/1658616.1658679
  35. *Huang, K., Dong, Y., & Ge, X. (2006). From, by, and for the OSSD: Software engineering education using an open source software approach. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(1). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol3/iss1/7
  36. *Joo, K. P., Andrés, C., & Shearer, R. (2014). Promoting distance learners’ cognitive engagement and learning outcomes: Design-based research in the Costa Rican National University of Distance Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1908
  37. Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115128. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_6
  38. Kelly, A. E. (2014). Design-based research in engineering education: Current state and next steps. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.032
  39. Kolko, J. (2012). Wicked problems: Problems worth solving. Licenses under Creative Commone Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Retrieved from http://www.wickedproblems.com/ December 1, 2020.
  40. Kolmos, A. (2015). Design-based research: A strategy for change in engineering education. In S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, & B. Newberry (Eds.), International perspectives on engineering education (pp. 373392). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_18
  41. *Kong, S. C., Yeung, Y. Y., & Wu, X. Q. (2009). An experience of teaching for learning by observation: Remote-controlled experiments on electrical circuits. Computers & Education, 52(3), 702717. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.011
  42. *Langman, C., Zawojewski, J., McNicholas, P., Cinar, A., Brey, E., Bilgic, M., & Mehdizadeh, H. (2019). Disciplinary learning from an authentic engineering context. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(1). DOI: 10.7771/2157-9288.1178
  43. Levy, R. A., & Begeny, J. C. (2018). Understanding the realities of conducting school-based intervention research. DOI: 10.4135/9781526431837
  44. *Liu, Y.-H., & Yu, F.-Y. (2019). Supporting active learning and formative evaluation via teaching-by-questioning in classrooms: design, development, and preliminary evaluation of an online learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5–6), 841855. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1489858
  45. *Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K–12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1). DOI: 10.7771/2157-9288.1069
  46. *Newstetter, W. C. (2005). Designing cognitive apprenticeships for biomedical engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(2), 207213. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00841.x
  47. Oxman, A. D., Cook, D. J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1994). Users’ guides to the medical literature, VI. How to use an overview. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 13671371. DOI: 10.1001/jama.272.17.1367
  48. Pawley, A. L. (2017). Shifting the “default”: The case for making diversity the expected condition for engineering education and making whiteness and maleness visible. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 531533. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20181
  49. Phillips, D. C., & Dolle, J. R. (2006). From Plato to Brown and beyond: Theory, practice, and the promise of design experiments. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Bockaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends: Sixteen essays in honour of Erik DeCort (pp. 277293). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
  50. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences (155169). DOI: 10.1007/BF01405730
  51. Rossman, J. S., & Skvirsky, K. A. (2010). You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows: The art & science of flow visualization. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference Washington, DC. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673176
  52. Rothman, J., & Thomas, E. J. (Eds.). (1994). Intervention research: Design and development for human service. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc. DOI: 10.1093/sw/41.1.111-a
  53. Salkind, N. J. (Ed.) (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. SAGE Publications, Inc. DOI: 10.4135/9781412961288
  54. Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 1836. DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
  55. Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170183). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. DOI: 10.4135/9781446282243.n12
  56. Stappers, P. J., & Giaccardi, E. (2002). Chapter 43. Research through design. In The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (2nd ed.): Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed/research-through-design
  57. *Tang, K.-S. (2013). Out-of-school media representations of science and technology and their relevance for engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 5176. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20007
  58. The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 58. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032001005
  59. *Todd, A. M., Zydney, J. M., & Keller, J. M. (2011). Developing an online learning community for engineering, cooperative-education students: A design-based research study. Journal of Cooperative Education and Internships, 45(01), 6779.
  60. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 53(4), 523. DOI: 10.1007/BF02504682
  61. *Weber, N. R., Strobel, J., Dyehouse, M. A., Harris, C., David, R., Fang, J., & Hua, I. (2014). First-year students’ environmental awareness and understanding of environmental sustainability through a life cycle assessment module. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 154181. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20032
  62. *Yueh, H. P., Chen, T. L., Lin, W., & Sheen, H. J. (2014). Developing digital courseware for a virtual nano-biotechnology laboratory: A design-based research approach. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 158168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.2.158?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  63. Zheng, L. (2015). A systematic literature review of design-based research from 2004 to 2013. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(3), 399420. DOI: 10.1007/s40692-015-0036-z
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.15 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 54
Submitted on: Jan 12, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 17, 2020
Published on: Feb 9, 2021
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Angela Minichiello, Lori Caldwell, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.