Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Military Separated Me; You Cannot Connect Me Cover

The Military Separated Me; You Cannot Connect Me

By:  and    
Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. Abulof, U. (2020). Taming self-determination: The trials of a political speech-act. International Political Science Review, 41(5), 622637. DOI: 10.1177/0192512119858360
  2. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109137. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
  3. Apostel, L. (1972). Illocutionary forces and the logic of change. Mind, 81(322), 208224. DOI: 10.1093/mind/LXXXI.322.208
  4. Ariel, M. (2010). Defining pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511777912
  5. Blakemore, E. (2021, October 19). From LGBT to LGBTQIA+: The evolving recognition of identity. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/from-lgbt-to-lgbtqia-the-evolving-recognition-of-identity
  6. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4), 585614. DOI: 10.1177/1461445605054407
  7. Carlson, M., Endlsey, M., Motley, D., Shawahin, L. N., & Williams, M. T. (2018). Addressing the impact of racism on veterans of color: A race-based stress and trauma intervention. Psychology of Violence, 8(6), 748762. DOI: 10.1037/vio0000221
  8. Cebrián, E., & Domenech, J. (2022). Is Google Trends a quality data source? Applied Economics Letters, 30(6), 811815. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2021.2023088
  9. Dallocchio, M. (2021). Women veterans: Examining identity through an intersectional lens. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health, 7(s1), 111121. DOI: 10.3138/jmvfh-2021-0028
  10. del Río-González, A. M. (2021). To Latinx or not to Latinx: A question of gender inclusivity versus gender neutrality. American Journal of Public Health, 111(6), 10181021. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306238
  11. Dolan, G., McCauley, M., & Murphy, D. (2022). Factors influencing the salience of military/veteran identity post discharge: A scoping review. Journal of Veterans Studies, 8(1), 231. DOI: 10.21061/jvs.v8i1.333
  12. Exec. Order No. 14100, 88 Fed. Reg. 115 (June 09, 2023).
  13. Ferguson, J. M. (2013). Queering methodologies: Challenging scientific constraint in the appreciation of queer and trans subjects. Qualitative Report, 18(25), 113. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1539
  14. Ford, J. D. (2009). Understanding psychological trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, 130. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374462-3.00001-0
  15. Foucault, M. (1984). The history of sexuality: An introduction. Penguin.
  16. Genoe, A., Rousseau, R., & Rousseau, S. (2021). Applying Google Trends’ search popularity indicator to professional cycling. Journal of Sports Economics, 22(4), 459485. DOI: 10.1177/1527002520988329
  17. George, R. C. Jr.. (2022). Utilizing educational supports: A case study of enlisted marine active-duty women student veterans pursuing higher education [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina Wilmington].
  18. Goldstein, A. N. (2018). Women are the most visible servicemembers, and the most invisible veterans. Center for New American Security. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/women-are-the-most-visible-soldiers-and-the-most-invisible-veterans
  19. Gu, M., Patkin, J., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2014). The dynamic identity construction in English as lingua franca intercultural communication: A positioning perspective. System, 46, 131142. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2014.07.010
  20. Hart, R., & Lancaster, S. L. (2017). Identity fusion in U.S. Military members. Armed Forces & Society, 45(1), 4558. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X17737021
  21. Hinojosa, M. S., Hinojosa, R., Condon, J., & DaSilva, S. (2023). Adverse Childhood Experiences in military, veteran, and civilian families. Armed Forces & Society. Advanced online publication. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X231161365
  22. Hinton, C. E. (2020). “I just don’t like to have my car marked”: Nuancing Identity attachments and belonging in student veterans. Journal of Veterans Studies, 6(3), 84100. DOI: 10.21061/jvs.v6i3.211
  23. Hunt, B., Lim, J. H., & Williams, J. A. (2022). Unsung heroes on campus: Minority veterans’ transition experiences by race. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(5), 769791. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2022.2031705
  24. Ishihara, N. (2019). Identity and agency in L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 161175). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351164085-11
  25. Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: An introduction. New York University Press.
  26. Jones, J. (2013). US Blacks, Hispanics have no preferences on group labels. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/163706/blacks-hispanics-no-preferences-group-labels.aspx
  27. Kellner, D. (1990). Critical theory and the crisis of social theory. Sociological Perspectives, 33(1), 1133. DOI: 10.2307/1388975
  28. Kross, J. (2014). Queer theory or queer choice of identification? [Doctoral dissertation, Florida International University].
  29. Krueger, J. S., & Pedraza, F. I. (2011). Missing voices: War attitudes among military service-connected civilians. Armed Forces & Society, 38(3), 391412. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X11428786
  30. Lippi, G., Mattiuzzi, C., Cervellin, G., & Favaloro, E. J. (2017). Direct oral anticoagulants: Analysis of worldwide use and popularity using Google Trends. Annals of Translational Medicine, 5(16), 322322. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.65
  31. McCarthy, J., & Dupreé, W. (2021, August 4). No preferred racial term among most Black, Hispanic adults. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/353000/no-preferred-racial-term-among-black-hispanic-adults.aspx
  32. Malagón-Selma, P., Debón, A., & Domenech, J. (2023). Measuring the popularity of football players with Google Trends. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0289213. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289213
  33. Miranda, A. R., Perez-Brumer, A., & Charlton, B. M. (2023). Latino? Latinx? Latine? A call for inclusive categories in epidemiologic research. American Journal of Epidemiology, 192(12), 19291932. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwad149
  34. Molina, D., & Morse, A. (2017). Differences between military-connected undergraduates: Implications for institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2016(171), 5973. DOI: 10.1002/ir.20194
  35. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Understanding the well-being of LGBTQI+ populations. National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/25877
  36. National Center for PTSD. (2024, March 19). Trauma reminders: Triggers. US Department of Veterans Affairs. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/understand/what/trauma_triggers.asp
  37. Õim, H. (1977). Towards a theory of linguistic pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 1(3), 251267. DOI: 10.1016/0378-2166(77)90037-6
  38. Phillips, G. A., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017) Introducing veteran critical theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(7), 656668. DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2017.1309586
  39. Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers. (2020, October 1). Veterans Affairs program of comprehensive assistance for family caregivers: Eligibility criteria fact sheet. US Department of Veterans Affairs. https://www.caregiver.va.gov/pdfs/MIssionAct/EligibilityCriteriaFactsheet_Chapter2_Launch_Approved_Final_100120.pdf
  40. Roberts, T., & Zheng, Y. (2022, May). Datafication, dehumanisation and participatory development. In Y. Zheng, P. Abbott, & J. A. Robles-Flores (Eds.), Freedom and social inclusion in a connected world (pp. 377396). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-19429-0_23
  41. Rubin, G. S. (2002). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In R. Parker & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Culture, society and sexuality (pp. 143178). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203966105-21
  42. Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781412986281
  43. Shi, Y., & Lei, L. (2020). The evolution of LGBT labelling words: Tracking 150 years of the interaction of semantics with social and cultural changes. English Today, 36(4), 3339. DOI: 10.1017/S0266078419000270
  44. Slemp, K. (2020). Latino, Latina, Latin@, Latine, and Latinx: Gender inclusive oral expression in Spanish. The University of Western Ontario.
  45. Smith, B. A., Murib, Z., Motta, M., Callaghan, T. H., & Theys, M. (2018). “Gay” or “homosexual”? The implications of social category labels for the structure of mass attitudes. American Politics Research, 46(2), 336372. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X17706560
  46. Thomas, K. H., & Hunter, K. (Eds.). (2019). Invisible veterans. ABC-CLIO. DOI: 10.5040/9798400672361
  47. Trujillo-Pagán, N. (2018). Crossed out by LatinX: Gender neutrality and genderblind sexism. Latino Studies, 16(3), 396406. DOI: 10.1057/s41276-018-0138-7
  48. US Department of Defense. (2022). Demographics profile of the military community. https://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2022-demographics-report.pdf
  49. US Department of Education. (2022). Veterans and military families. https://www.ed.gov/veterans-and-military-families
  50. Van Winkle, E. P., & Lipari, R. N. (2013). The impact of multiple deployments and social support on stress levels of women married to active duty servicemen. Armed Forces & Society, 41(3), 395412. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X13500651
Language: English
Page range: 203 - 213
Submitted on: Feb 6, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 4, 2024
Published on: May 21, 2024
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Abby K. Kinch, Jared S. Lyon, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.