The Paradox of Specialization: The Double-Edge Sword of Veterans Studies as a Distinct Academic Field

Daniel M. Peat

doi:10.21061/jvs.v10i1.553

The Paradox of Specialization: The Double-Edge Sword of Veterans Studies as a Distinct Academic Field

Journal of Veterans Studies

Volume 10 (2024): Issue 1

By: Daniel M. Peat

Open Access

|May 2024

Abstract

This essay critically evaluates the emergence of veterans studies as a distinct academic discipline, with a focus on its impact within the field of management research. It explores the dualistic nature of this development, highlighting both the potential benefits and inherent challenges. The discourse delves into how treating veterans studies as a separate field influences academic norms, research practices, and the perception of this area within broader scholarly communities. Recommendations are proposed for both individual researchers and academic institutions, aimed at effectively integrating veterans studies into mainstream academic discourse.

References

Carmine, S., & Smith, W. (2021). Organizational paradox. In Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199846740-0201
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ellemers, N., Sleebos, E., Stam, D., & de Gilder, D. (2013). Feeling included and valued: How perceived respect affects positive team identity and willingness to invest in the team. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 21–37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00784.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kirchner, M., & Akdere, M. (2019). An empirical investigation of the acquisition of leadership KSAs in the US Army: Implications for veterans’ career transitions. Journal of Veterans Studies, 4(1), 110–127. DOI: 10.21061/jvs.v4i1.85
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2000.3707712
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lievens, F., Van Hoye, G., & Anseel, F. (2007). Organizational identity and employer image: Towards a unifying framework. British Journal of Management, 18, S45–S59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00525.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2008.31767217
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Palmer, K. (2024). Veterans’ studies gains traction as emerging field. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/students/academics/2024/01/05/veterans-studies-gains-traction-emerging-field
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peat, D. M., & Perrmann-Graham, J. (2023). Where do I belong? Conflicted identities and theparadox of simultaneous stigma and social aggrandizement of military veterans in organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(17), 3401–3429. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2022.2122730
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Putnam, L. L. (1986). Contradictions and paradoxes in organizations. Organization Communications: Emerging Perspectives, Vol. I (pp. 151–167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2009.0223
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sober, E. (2020). Core questions in philosophy. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351043403
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wong, L., Bliese, P., & McGurk, D. (2003). Military leadership: A context specific review. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 657–692. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.08.001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article