Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Formal Assessment in STEM Higher Education: A General Analysis and Recommendations for Improvement Cover

Formal Assessment in STEM Higher Education: A General Analysis and Recommendations for Improvement

By:   
Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Alonso-Yanez, G., Brown, B., Preciado-Babb, A., & Sengupta, P. (2016). Exploring STEM professional learning: A social network analysis. 4th International STEM in Education Conference, Beijing, China.
  2. Amalina, I. K., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment in STEM problem-solving: A systematic review. The International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 29(2), 6380. 10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v29i02/63-80
  3. Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2005). Reframing the evaluation of education: Assessing whether learning transfers beyond the classroom. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 295312). Information Age Publishing. https://web-b-ebscohost-com.proxy.lib.strath.ac.uk/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzQ3MDM4Ml9fQU41?sid=e40e3b58-d0ea-4ca1–8800–36e30084fba6@pdc-v-sessmgr01&vid=0&format=EB&rid=1
  4. Baroody, A. J., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2024). Assessment for Learning. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  5. Beggrow, E., & Sbeglia, G. (2019). Do disciplinary contexts impact learning of evolution? Assessing knowledge and misconceptions in anthropology and biology students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 12(1). 10.1186/s12052-018-0094-6
  6. Black, P., & William, D. (2010). Inside the black box raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2). 10.1177/003172171009200119
  7. Chen, Y. M. (2006). EFL instruction and assessment with portfolios: A case study in Taiwan. Asian EFL Journal, 8(1), 6996.
  8. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational psychology review, 24, 205249. 10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
  9. Drake, S., & Reid, J. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 3150. 10.30777/APJER.2018.1.1.03
  10. Dunn, K., & Mulvenon, S. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14(7). 10.7275/jg4h-rb87
  11. El Sayary, A. (2021). Transdisciplinary STEAM curriculum design and authentic assessment in online learning: A model of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 493511. 10.36681/tused.2021.86
  12. Ercikan, K., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2017). Validation of score meaning for the next generation of assessments: The use of response processes. 10.4324/9781315708591
  13. Furtak, E. M., Heredia, S. C., & Morrison, D. (2019). Formative assessment in science education: Mapping a shifting terrain. In Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 97125). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315166933-5
  14. Gao, X., Peishan, L., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(24). 10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4
  15. Gaylor, K. L. (2017). High school science teachers’ attitudes toward, beliefs about, and implementation of inquiry-based science methods. Mississippi College.
  16. Grangeat, M., Harrison, C., & Dilot, J. (2021). Developing formative assessment in STEM classrooms. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
  17. Harris, C. J., Wiebe, E., Grover, S., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.) (2023). Classroom-Based STEM assessment: Contemporary issues and perspectives. Community for Advancing Discovery Research in Education (CADRE). Education Development Center, Inc.
  18. Herrington, J., & Parker, J. (2013). Emerging technologies as cognitive tools for authentic learning. British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET), 44(4), 607615. 10.1111/bjet.12048
  19. Herro, D., Quigley, C., Andrews, J., & Delacruz, G. (2017). Co-measure: Developing an assessment for student collaboration in STEAM activities. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(26). 10.1186/s40594-017-0094-z
  20. Karakaya, F., & Yilmaz, M. (2022). Teacher’s views on assessment and evaluation methods in STEM education: A science course example. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1339685.pdf
  21. Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 120. 10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
  22. Kubsch, M., Czinczel, B., Lossjew, J., Wyrwich, T., Bednorz, D., Bernholt, S., Fiedler, D., Strauß, S., Cress, U., Drachsler, H., Neumann, K., & Rummel, N. (2022). Towards learning progressive analytics – developing learning environments for the automated analysis of learning using evidence centered design. Front. Educ., Sec. STEM Education, 7. 10.3389/feduc.2022.981910
  23. Kwietniewski, K. (2017). Literature review of project based learning. [Career & technical education theses, Buffalo State]. https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/careereducation_theses/1
  24. Maki, P. L. (2023). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003443056
  25. Manduca, C. A., Iverson, E. R., Luxenberg, M., Macdonald, R. H., McConnell, D. A., Mogk, D. W., & Tewksbury, B. J. (2017). Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development. Science Advances, 3(2), e1600193. 10.1126/sciadv.1600193
  26. McNair, S., Bhargava, A., Adams, L., & Edgerton, S. (2003). Teachers speak out on assessment practices. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31(1). 2331. 10.1023/A:1025180617689
  27. Miller, R. (1981). Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences: A 1981 overview. Issues in Integrative Studies: An Occasional Publication of the Association for Integrative Studies, (1982), 137.
  28. Mohd Al Hamad, N., Adewusi, O., Unachukwu, C., Osawaru, B., & Chisom, O. (2024). A review on the innovative approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11(1), 244252. 10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.1.0026
  29. Moreno, K. A. (2018). Stem educators’ integration of formative assessment in teaching and lesson design. College of Saint Elizabeth.
  30. Mueller, J. (2005). The authentic assessment toolbox: Enhancing student learning through online faculty development. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1(1). http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/whatisit.htm
  31. Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. State University of New York Press.
  32. Peterson, B., & Hippie, B. (2020). Formative assessment in hands-on STEM education. Virginia Tech. 10.4018/978-1-7998-0323-2.ch009
  33. Rapoport, A. (1986). General system theory: Essential concepts & applications. CRC Press.
  34. Reynolds, et al. (2020). How can educators identify and address potential barriers when designing instruction? Page 5: Assessments. Iris Center. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/udl/cresource/q2/p05/
  35. Sanders, N. (2015). Forecasting fundamentals. Business Expert Press, ProQuest Ebook Central. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ncsu/detail.action?docID=4742536
  36. Saxton, E., Burns, R., Holveck, S., Kelley, S., Prince, D., Rigelman, N., & Skinner, E. (2014). A common measurement system for K-12 STEM education: adopting an educational evaluation methodology that elevates theoretical foundations and systems thinking. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 40, 1835. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.005
  37. Slavinec, M., Aberšek, B., Gačević, D., & Flogie, A. (2019). Monodisciplinary in science versus transdisciplinarity in STEM education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(3), 436. 10.33225/jbse/19.18.435
  38. Tan, H., & Kidman, G. (2021). Authentic assessment in STEM education: An integrative review of research. In T. Barkatsas & T. McLaughlin (Eds.), Authentic assessment and evaluation approaches and practices in a digital era. (pp. 2452). Brill. 10.1163/9789004501577_002
  39. Tom, M. (2015). Five Cs Framework: A Student-centered approach for teaching programming courses to students with diverse disciplinary backgrounds. Journal of Learning Design, 8(1). https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/4e1305f5-db0d-4b63–9f89–16717cda2705/content
  40. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  41. Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021. The International Journal of STEM Education, 9(59), 10. 10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5
  42. Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, S. C., Yung Jong, M. S., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J., Yuan, J., & Li Y. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. 10.1155/2021/8812542
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jts.429 | Journal eISSN: 1541-9258
Language: English
Page range: 42 - 52
Submitted on: Oct 24, 2024
Accepted on: May 20, 2025
Published on: Jul 21, 2025
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 William Mistler, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.